Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Yes, the patch had some context conflicts with some other patch
>> so the patch application was done by hand, and I did a quick and
>> dirty cut & paste of the commit message from "cat mbox" output.
>>
>>
Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Apparently, my mail was encoded as QP, which is not very popular
>> around here. But it seems that the diff part was decoded properly
>> before applying. Was that done manually?
>
> Yes, the patch had some context conflicts with some other patch
> so
Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, the patch had some context conflicts with some other patch
> so the patch application was done by hand, and I did a quick and
> dirty cut & paste of the commit message from "cat mbox" output.
>
> I will probably drop future patches encoded in QP.
> Apparently, my mail was encoded as QP, which is not very popular
> around here. But it seems that the diff part was decoded properly
> before applying. Was that done manually?
Yes, the patch had some context conflicts with some other patch
so the patch application was done by hand, and I did a
David Kågedal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The git-cvsimport-script had a copule of small bugs that prevented me
> from importing a big CVS repository.
>
> The first was that it didn't handle removed files with a multi-digit
> primary revision number.
I noticed that this patch was accepted, whic
5 matches
Mail list logo