On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody is checking for specific error codes; it's the errno that's
important.
Have you just disregarded the in-code comment you just removed
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody is checking for specific error codes; it's the errno
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Nobody is checking for specific error codes; it's the errno that's
important.
[...]
- /*
- * This return value is chosen so that code 0xff
- * mimics the exit code that a POSIX shell would report for
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Felipe Contreras
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Nobody is checking for specific error codes; it's the errno that's
important.
[...]
- /*
- * This return value is chosen so that code 0xff
-
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody is checking for specific error codes; it's the errno that's
important.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, and last year we returned a different code. The world
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Felipe Contreras
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 09:30:50AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
The original commit that introduces this says
run_command: encode deadly signal number in the return value
We now write the signal number in the error message if the program
terminated by a signal. The
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 09:30:50AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
commit 709ca730f8e093005cc882bfb86c0ca9c83d345b
Author: Jeff King p...@peff.net
Date: Sat Jan 5 09:49:49 2013 -0500
run-command: encode signal death as a
10 matches
Mail list logo