On zo, 2013-06-23 at 15:33 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dennis Kaarsemaker den...@kaarsemaker.net writes:
On zo, 2013-06-23 at 14:22 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dennis Kaarsemaker den...@kaarsemaker.net writes:
Equality for
wildcards is allowed and tested for, so do we really want
Dennis Kaarsemaker den...@kaarsemaker.net writes:
Apart from the exactly matching refspecs, does git in any other way
treat this as a special case?
Sorry, I do not quite understand, especially the exactly matching
part, which as far as I know is not special (in other words, I am
not sure what
On vr, 2013-06-21 at 11:42 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
+(!fnmatch(refspec, remote-fetch[i].dst, 0) ||
+ !fnmatch(remote-fetch[i].dst, refspec, 0))) {
Does .dst always exist and is never a NULL? My quick scan of
remote.c::parse_refspec_internal() tells me
Dennis Kaarsemaker den...@kaarsemaker.net writes:
Equality for
wildcards is allowed and tested for, so do we really want to 'outlaw'
equality of non-wildcard refspecs?
I am not sure what you mean by equality for wildcards is allowed.
Do you mean this pair of remote definition is sane and not
On zo, 2013-06-23 at 14:22 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dennis Kaarsemaker den...@kaarsemaker.net writes:
Equality for
wildcards is allowed and tested for, so do we really want to 'outlaw'
equality of non-wildcard refspecs?
I am not sure what you mean by equality for wildcards is
Dennis Kaarsemaker den...@kaarsemaker.net writes:
On zo, 2013-06-23 at 14:22 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dennis Kaarsemaker den...@kaarsemaker.net writes:
Equality for
wildcards is allowed and tested for, so do we really want to 'outlaw'
equality of non-wildcard refspecs?
I am not
Dennis Kaarsemaker den...@kaarsemaker.net writes:
When cloning a repo with --mirror, and adding more remotes later,
Even though --mirror is not the only way to trigger this, I think it
is good to mention it because it is the most common way to do so.
get_stale_heads for origin will mark all
7 matches
Mail list logo
