Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Verify GPG signatures when merging and extend %G? pretty string

2013-03-26 Thread Sebastian Götte
On 03/26/2013 05:26 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sebastian Götte writes: > >> On 03/26/2013 02:46 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:> Sebastian Götte >> writes: Rebased it onto the current 'master'. The second patch fixes that the GPG status parser ignores the first line of GPG status output (t

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Verify GPG signatures when merging and extend %G? pretty string

2013-03-26 Thread Junio C Hamano
Sebastian Götte writes: > On 03/26/2013 02:46 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:> Sebastian Götte > writes: >>> Rebased it onto the current 'master'. The second patch fixes that the GPG >>> status parser ignores the first line of GPG status output (that would be >>> caught >>> by the new merge signatur