On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 08:44:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >
> > Damn cool? No problem. :)
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=403fe5ae57c831968c3dbbaba291ae825a1c5aaa
>
> Goodie. Although
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:20:16AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Looks good also. I assume the mouse can't change when it hovers?
In gitk? This is be possible. My patch[1] does it. The way it's done stinks a
little bit, though. and are bound on a tag common to all the
"hyperlinks", and cha
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Linus Torvalds writes:
> >
> > - "clickable" SHA1's in commit messages would be really really cool if
> >something like that is even possible with tcl/tk.
>
> Done, and it was even pretty easy. It took only about a dozen lines.
Looks good also
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
> Damn cool? No problem. :)
>
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=403fe5ae57c831968c3dbbaba291ae825a1c5aaa
Goodie. Although when I looked at it first, it wasn't obvious - the link
is same font, same color
Linus Torvalds writes:
> - "clickable" SHA1's in commit messages would be really really cool if
>something like that is even possible with tcl/tk.
Done, and it was even pretty easy. It took only about a dozen lines.
> - I'd like to have a "back button". Not just for the above kind of thi
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 07:37:41AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> [ Also Kay Sievers, because the clickability thing sounds like a
> potentially good thing for webgit too.. ]
...
> For 2.6.13 we've been reverting some stuff lately, to make sure we get a
> stable release. That's fine, and whe
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 07:37:41AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> For 2.6.13 we've been reverting some stuff lately, to make sure we get a
> stable release. That's fine, and when I revert something I try to mention
> the commit ID of the thing I revert in the message. Apparently others do
> too,
[ Also Kay Sievers, because the clickability thing sounds like a
potentially good thing for webgit too.. ]
For 2.6.13 we've been reverting some stuff lately, to make sure we get a
stable release. That's fine, and when I revert something I try to mention
the commit ID of the thing I revert in
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> I have reworked the way gitk displays merges.
Ok, goodie. It works fine in my environment, with most merges showing up
as not interesting. But a merge like
3e0777b8fa96f7073ed5d13d3bc1d573b766bef9
shows an example of where there was actua
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:51:40 -0500 Paul Mackerras wrote:
> I have reworked the way gitk displays merges.
I have found a reproducible bug in gitk which seems to be in that new
code for merges. Run
gitk f4b3a4c30b5ea3a5de2a2597a3c53266017d02ba
on the git or cogito repository (that commit
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Linus, could you do a pull from the usual place to pick this up?
> (rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/gitk/gitk.git). I also included a
> patch from Junio.
In case you did not notice, /pub/scm/git/git.git/ repository is
under the care of yours truly st
11 matches
Mail list logo
