On 12/01, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:35:24AM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > > I wouldn't expect anyone to ever set GIT_PROTOCOL_FROM_USER=1, but it
> > > does behave in a funny way here, overriding the "redirect" flag. I think
> > > we'd want something more like:
> > >
>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:35:24AM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
> > I wouldn't expect anyone to ever set GIT_PROTOCOL_FROM_USER=1, but it
> > does behave in a funny way here, overriding the "redirect" flag. I think
> > we'd want something more like:
> >
> > if (redirect < 0)
> > redirect
On 12/01, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:14:15AM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > > 1. The new policy config lets you say "only allow this protocol when
> > > the user specifies it". But when http.c calls is_transport_allowed(),
> > > the latter has no idea that we a
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:14:15AM -0800, Brandon Williams wrote:
> > 1. The new policy config lets you say "only allow this protocol when
> > the user specifies it". But when http.c calls is_transport_allowed(),
> > the latter has no idea that we are asking it about potential
> >
On 12/01, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:15:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > * bw/transport-protocol-policy (2016-11-09) 2 commits
> > (merged to 'next' on 2016-11-16 at 1391d3eeed)
> > + transport: add protocol policy config option
> > + lib-proto-disable: variable name
5 matches
Mail list logo