Re: git-format-patch-script bug?

2005-08-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes: I was trying to help someone track down a bug that occurred between linux-2.6.12 and linux-2.6.13-rc1. Since it was very much an unknown where the problem was introduced I decided to run git format-patch so I could see what all of the differences

Re: git-format-patch-script bug?

2005-08-07 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes: I was trying to help someone track down a bug that occurred between linux-2.6.12 and linux-2.6.13-rc1. Since it was very much an unknown where the problem was introduced I decided to run git format-patch

Re: git-format-patch-script bug?

2005-08-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes: What format-patch does is currently is fine. If format-patch would simply notice the case and fail gracefully that would be sufficient to avoid giving false impressions. Hmph. Since it uses merge-order, We should be able to change it use the