Re: sys/param.h

2012-12-19 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: sys/param.h

2012-12-19 Thread Mark Levedahl
On 12/19/2012 02:59 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Johannes Sixt writes: Junio C Hamano wrote: It could turn out that we may be able to get rid of sys/param.h altogether, but one step at a time. Inputs from people on minority platforms are

Re: sys/param.h

2012-12-19 Thread Erik Faye-Lund
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Sixt writes: > >>> Junio C Hamano wrote: >>>> It could turn out that we may be able to get rid of sys/param.h >>>> altogether, but one step at a time. Inputs from people on minority >>

Re: sys/param.h

2012-12-18 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
On 18.12.12 18:01, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Sixt writes: > >>> Junio C Hamano wrote: >>>> It could turn out that we may be able to get rid of sys/param.h >>>> altogether, but one step at a time. Inputs from people on minority >>>> platf

sys/param.h

2012-12-18 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Sixt writes: >> Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> It could turn out that we may be able to get rid of sys/param.h >>> altogether, but one step at a time. Inputs from people on minority >>> platforms are very much appreciated---does your platform build fine >

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Support builds when sys/param.h is missing

2012-12-15 Thread Junio C Hamano
David Michael writes: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I have this suspicion that nobody would notice if we simply stopped >> including the header. > > While I'm not aware of any subtleties it could be causing on other > platforms,

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Support builds when sys/param.h is missing

2012-12-14 Thread David Michael
Hi, On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I have this suspicion that nobody would notice if we simply stopped > including the header. While I'm not aware of any subtleties it could be causing on other platforms, it does seem fine to drop sys/param.h on my tes

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Support builds when sys/param.h is missing

2012-12-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
David Michael writes: > An option is added to the Makefile to skip the inclusion of sys/param.h. > The only known platform with this condition thus far is the z/OS UNIX System > Services environment. > > Signed-off-by: David Michael > --- Hmm, makes me wonder if we can rem

[PATCH 1/4] Support builds when sys/param.h is missing

2012-12-14 Thread David Michael
An option is added to the Makefile to skip the inclusion of sys/param.h. The only known platform with this condition thus far is the z/OS UNIX System Services environment. Signed-off-by: David Michael --- Makefile | 5 + configure.ac | 6 ++ git-compat-util.h | 2 ++ 3