Re: [PR] WIP: [Release] Verify release-21.0.0-rc5 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47077: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47077#issuecomment-3060885062 @github-actions crossbow submit --group verify-rc-source --param release=21.0.0 --param rc=5 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[PR] WIP: [Release] Verify release-21.0.0-rc5 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou opened a new pull request, #47077: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47077 PR to verify Release Candidate -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To uns

Re: [PR] WIP: [Release] Verify release-21.0.0-rc4 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47073: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47073#issuecomment-3060857547 The source archive isn't enough reproducible. Let's try RC5. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th

Re: [PR] WIP: [Release] Verify release-21.0.0-rc4 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou closed pull request #47073: WIP: [Release] Verify release-21.0.0-rc4 URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47073 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

Re: [PR] GH-47074: [Release] Use reproducible mtime for csharp/ in source archive [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou merged PR #47076: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47076 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.or

Re: [I] [Release] csharp/ mtime in source archive isn't reproducible [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on issue #47074: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/47074#issuecomment-3060850229 Issue resolved by pull request 47076 https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47076 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [PR] GH-47074: [Release] Use reproducible mtime for csharp/ in source archive [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47076: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47076#issuecomment-3060848727 +1 I'll try this for RC5. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific c

Re: [I] Add Flight JDBC Connection String example [arrow-flight-sql-postgresql]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on issue #190: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-flight-sql-postgresql/issues/190#issuecomment-3060748597 No. It seems that we can change it by the `POSTGRES_HOST_AUTH_METHOD` environment variable: https://hub.docker.com/_/postgres#postgres_host_auth_method Could yo

Re: [PR] GH-47074: [Release] Use reproducible mtime for csharp/ in source archive [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47076: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47076#issuecomment-3060732132 :warning: GitHub issue #47074 **has been automatically assigned in GitHub** to PR creator. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

[PR] GH-47074: [Release] Use reproducible mtime for csharp/ in source archive [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou opened a new pull request, #47076: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47076 ### Rationale for this change The current source archive creation is reproducible when we use the same Git working tree. But it's not reproducible when we use different Git working trees.

Re: [PR] perf: speed up StringViewArray gc 1.4 ~5.x faster [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #7873: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7873#issuecomment-3060692424 Interesting the Rustdocs check seems broken, not related to this PR. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

Re: [I] field_to_json() in arrow_integration_test/ field.rs does not serialize fields metadata [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
klion26 commented on issue #6700: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/6700#issuecomment-3060670367 @alamb, I have some questions after conducting an analysis; I'm not sure if we need to make this change. Could you please help to confirm this? I can submit a PR if this change is n

Re: [PR] Remove redundant is_err checks [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
viirya commented on PR #7897: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7897#issuecomment-3060657413 Seems the CI was broken. Proposed the fix https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7898 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

Re: [PR] add `garbage_collect_dictionary` to `arrow-select` [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
davidhewitt commented on PR #7716: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7716#issuecomment-3060657116 Wow CI has not been kind here! Merged main again. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL abo

[PR] Fix current CI failure [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
viirya opened a new pull request, #7898: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7898 # Which issue does this PR close? None # Rationale for this change Currently CI is failed: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/actions/runs/16210835231/job/45770459574?pr=789

Re: [PR] WIP: [Release] Verify release-21.0.0-rc4 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47073: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47073#issuecomment-3060520336 Revision: apache-arrow-21.0.0-rc4 Submitted crossbow builds: [ursacomputing/crossbow @ release-21.0.0-rc4-1](https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/branches/all?query=release-21.0.0-

Re: [I] Update doc to recommend to use PrimitiveBuilder or PrimitiveArray::from() [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
abacef commented on issue #7297: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/7297#issuecomment-3060513714 @jayzhan211 I am interested in working on this (if @ajita-asthana you are not) but can you explain more what types of things should be benchmarked here? Are you seeing that doing a f

Re: [PR] WIP: [Release] Verify release-21.0.0-rc4 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47073: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47073#issuecomment-3060506439 Revision: f2cf4007d42239d32969b19bd0e740b7d73682f3 Submitted crossbow builds: [ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-21fb12996a](https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/bra

Re: [PR] WIP: [Release] Verify release-21.0.0-rc4 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47073: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47073#issuecomment-3060499544 @github-actions crossbow submit --group verify-rc-source --param release=21.0.0 --param rc=4 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[PR] WIP: [Release] Verify release-21.0.0-rc4 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou opened a new pull request, #47073: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47073 PR to verify Release Candidate -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To uns

Re: [PR] feat(rust/core): add function to load driver manifests [arrow-adbc]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
eitsupi commented on code in PR #3099: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/3099#discussion_r2199534491 ## rust/core/src/driver_manager.rs: ## @@ -1310,3 +1645,506 @@ impl Drop for ManagedStatement { unsafe { method(statement.deref_mut(), null_mut()) }; }

Re: [PR] perf: speed up StringViewArray gc 1.4 ~5.x faster [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #7873: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7873#issuecomment-3060291994 > Thank you @zhuqi-lucas -- I think this PR could be merged as is > > I think we could improve the safety of `process_views` / make it less dangerous, but e could also do it as

Re: [PR] perf: speed up StringViewArray gc 1.3x ~2.x faster [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #7873: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7873#issuecomment-3060288344 > > 🤖: Benchmark completed > > 😮 -- very nuce Amazing, 1.44 ~ 5.4 faster! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, pleas

Re: [PR] perf: speed up StringViewArray gc 1.3x ~2.x faster [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #7873: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7873#discussion_r2199447035 ## arrow-array/src/array/byte_view_array.rs: ## @@ -473,13 +473,78 @@ impl GenericByteViewArray { /// Note: this function does not attempt to canonicalize / d

Re: [I] [Release] Source archive include hard links [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on issue #47071: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/47071#issuecomment-3060257706 Issue resolved by pull request 47072 https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47072 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [PR] GH-47071: [Release] Dereference all hard links in source archive [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou merged PR #47072: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47072 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.or

Re: [PR] GH-47071: [Release] Dereference all hard links in source archive [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47072: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47072#issuecomment-3060257390 +1 RC3 is failed by this problem. I'll try this fix with RC4. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t

Re: [PR] GH-47045: [CI][C++] Use Fedora 42 instead of 39 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47046: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47046#issuecomment-3060253979 Revision: ca78771d9f3055d37fe3ac07d2bccd1a2785450f Submitted crossbow builds: [ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-66624d6f27](https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/bra

Re: [PR] GH-47045: [CI][C++] Use Fedora 42 instead of 39 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47046: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47046#issuecomment-3060247548 @github-actions crossbow submit *fedora* -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the sp

Re: [I] [Variant][Compute] `variant_get` kernel [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
Samyak2 commented on issue #7893: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/7893#issuecomment-3060246629 take -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubs

Re: [I] [Variant][Compute] `variant_get` kernel [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
Samyak2 commented on issue #7893: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/7893#issuecomment-3060247795 I know we're waiting for https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7884 to be merged. But I'll have some proof of concept on top of that branch for now. -- This is an automated mess

Re: [PR] GH-47071: [Release] Dereference all hard links in source archive [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47072: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47072#issuecomment-3060208037 :warning: GitHub issue #47071 **has been automatically assigned in GitHub** to PR creator. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

[PR] GH-47071: [Release] Dereference all hard links in source archive [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou opened a new pull request, #47072: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47072 ### Rationale for this change Apache Rat doesn't like hard links. ### What changes are included in this PR? Use `tar --hard-dereference`. ### Are these changes tested? Yes

Re: [PR] Add tests for invalid variant metadata and value [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
viirya commented on code in PR #7885: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7885#discussion_r2199385788 ## parquet-variant/src/variant/object.rs: ## @@ -474,4 +474,78 @@ mod tests { let fields: Vec<_> = variant_obj.iter().collect(); assert_eq!(fields.len

[PR] Remove redundant is_err checks [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
viirya opened a new pull request, #7897: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7897 # Which issue does this PR close? None # Rationale for this change Address the comment https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7885#discussion_r2195436015. # What changes ar

Re: [PR] [Variant] Reduce variant-related struct sizes [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
scovich commented on PR #7888: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7888#issuecomment-3060158047 Looks like [docs job is broken](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/actions/runs/16210712671/job/45770109006?pr=7888) upstream? ``` error: unnecessary parentheses around closure bod

Re: [PR] [Variant] Speedup validation [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #7878: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7878#issuecomment-3060156882 > For example, the latest CI run displays errors like: > > > Documenting arrow-ord v55.2.0 (/__w/arrow-rs/arrow-rs/arrow-ord) > > error: unnecessary parentheses around closure body

Re: [I] [Variant] API to construct Shredded Variant Arrays [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
friendlymatthew commented on issue #7895: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/7895#issuecomment-3060154117 take -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. T

Re: [PR] [Variant] Speedup validation [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
friendlymatthew commented on PR #7878: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7878#issuecomment-3060147909 For example, the latest CI run displays errors like: > Documenting arrow-ord v55.2.0 (/__w/arrow-rs/arrow-rs/arrow-ord) error: unnecessary parentheses around closure bod

Re: [PR] memory tracking with memory pool [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #7303: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7303#issuecomment-3060147580 Thanks @waynexia and @Dandandan -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specifi

Re: [PR] memory tracking with memory pool [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #7303: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7303#issuecomment-3060147455 🚀 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-

Re: [PR] Add tests for invalid variant metadata and value [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on code in PR #7885: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7885#discussion_r2199376309 ## parquet-variant/src/variant/object.rs: ## @@ -474,4 +474,78 @@ mod tests { let fields: Vec<_> = variant_obj.iter().collect(); assert_eq!(fields.len(

Re: [PR] [Variant] Reduce variant-related struct sizes [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #7888: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7888#issuecomment-3060145386 I merged up from main to resolve a logical conflcit -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above t

Re: [I] [Variant] API to construct Shredded Variant Arrays [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
friendlymatthew commented on issue #7895: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/7895#issuecomment-3060145062 Hi, I think this relates a lot to my current work. I didn't think about a builder pattern, but that does seem like a very clever and safe way to build up shredded variants.

[PR] [Variant] test: add variant object tests with different sizes [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
odysa opened a new pull request, #7896: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7896 # Which issue does this PR close? We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can link an issu

Re: [PR] GH-37876: [Format] Add list-view specification to arrow format [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
klion26 commented on code in PR #37877: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/37877#discussion_r2199372594 ## docs/source/format/Columnar.rst: ## @@ -487,6 +499,103 @@ will be represented as follows: :: |---|---|

Re: [PR] [Variant] Reduce variant-related struct sizes [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #7888: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7888#issuecomment-3060139668 Looks like this PR has some clippy failures too -- once that is clean I'll plan to merge -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please lo

Re: [PR] [Variant] Speedup validation [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
friendlymatthew commented on PR #7878: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7878#issuecomment-3060140164 > Looks like there is one final CI check to fix and then I can merge this PR in https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/actions/runs/16209770665/job/45767524794?pr=7878 > > I c

Re: [PR] [Variant] Speedup validation [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #7878: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7878#issuecomment-3060134025 Looks like there is one final CI check to fix and then I can merge this PR in https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/actions/runs/16209770665/job/45767524794?pr=7878 I can't push to you

Re: [I] [Release] verify_rc.yml misses "needs: target" [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on issue #47069: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/47069#issuecomment-3060117570 Issue resolved by pull request 47070 https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47070 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [PR] GH-47069: [Release] Add missing "needs: target" [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou merged PR #47070: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47070 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.or

Re: [PR] GH-47069: [Release] Add missing "needs: target" [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47070: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47070#issuecomment-3060116506 +1 I confirmed that all jobs have correct `VERSION` and `RC`. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t

Re: [I] [Variant] Add low level support for shredding and unshredding [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on issue #7715: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/7715#issuecomment-3060102336 > What if the the writer just passes a shredding schema? For example, if they want to shred `v:c::INT`, they could provide: This is an excellent idea and it seems consistent wit

Re: [I] [Variant] Add low level support for shredding and unshredding [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on issue #7715: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/7715#issuecomment-3060099405 I wrote up an idea of how we might implement variant shredding here in a ticket. The idea would be to create a builder that did the shredding on creation - https://github.com/apache

Re: [I] [Variant] API o construct Shredded Variant Arrays [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on issue #7895: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/7895#issuecomment-3060098095 Note one important property of this design is that we could incrementally build up shredded variant output from JSON directly, rather than having to parse the json into a variant and

Re: [PR] GH-47069: [Release] Add missing "needs: target" [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47070: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47070#issuecomment-3060095399 :warning: GitHub issue #47069 **has been automatically assigned in GitHub** to PR creator. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

[PR] GH-47069: [Release] Add missing "needs: target" [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou opened a new pull request, #47070: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47070 ### Rationale for this change We need `needs: target` for jobs that use the `target` job outputs. ### What changes are included in this PR? Add missing `needs: target`s. ### Are

[I] [Variant] API o construct Shredded Variant Arrays [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
alamb opened a new issue, #7895: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/7895 **Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.** - part of https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/6736 - This is a follow up to https://githu

Re: [PR] GH-47067: [Release] Fix wrong GitHub Actions context in verify_rc.yml [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47068: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47068#issuecomment-3060085072 +1 I'm trying verifying RC by workflow dispatch before we cut a RC3. I found another problem: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/47069 -- This is an automated message from

Re: [I] [Release] Wrong GitHub Actions context for workflow dispatch inputs [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on issue #47067: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/47067#issuecomment-3060085594 Issue resolved by pull request 47068 https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47068 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [PR] GH-47067: [Release] Fix wrong GitHub Actions context in verify_rc.yml [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou merged PR #47068: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47068 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.or

Re: [PR] Upgrade tonic dependencies to 0.13.0 version (try 2) [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
MichaelScofield commented on code in PR #7839: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7839#discussion_r2199335122 ## arrow-flight/examples/flight_sql_server.rs: ## @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ mod tests { async fn bind_tcp() -> (TcpIncoming, SocketAddr) { let listener

Re: [PR] GH-47067: [Release] Fix wrong GitHub Actions context in verify_rc.yml [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47068: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47068#issuecomment-3060007328 :warning: GitHub issue #47067 **has been automatically assigned in GitHub** to PR creator. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

[PR] GH-47067: [Release] Fix wrong GitHub Actions context in verify_rc.yml [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou opened a new pull request, #47068: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47068 ### Rationale for this change We must use `inputs` not `input` for inputs for workflow dispatch: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/contexts-reference#inputs-context ### What change

Re: [I] [Release] verify_rc.yml has a wrong timeout configuration [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on issue #47065: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/47065#issuecomment-3059985899 Issue resolved by pull request 47066 https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47066 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [PR] GH-47065: [Release] Fix timeout key in verify_rc.yml [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou merged PR #47066: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47066 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.or

Re: [PR] GH-47065: [Release] Fix timeout key in verify_rc.yml [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47066: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47066#issuecomment-3059985422 +1 RC2 is failed by this problem. I'll try this fix for RC3. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th

Re: [PR] GH-47065: [Release] Fix timeout key in verify_rc.yml [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47066: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47066#issuecomment-3059971798 :warning: GitHub issue #47065 **has been automatically assigned in GitHub** to PR creator. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

[PR] GH-47065: [Release] Fix timeout key in verify_rc.yml [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou opened a new pull request, #47066: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47066 ### Rationale for this change We must use `timeout-minutes` not `timeout` for timeout. ### What changes are included in this PR? Fix key. ### Are these changes tested? No.

Re: [I] [CI][C++] Use Google Cloud Storage Testbench v0.55.0 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on issue #47047: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/47047#issuecomment-3059955664 Issue resolved by pull request 47048 https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47048 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [PR] GH-47047: [CI][C++] Use Google Cloud Storage Testbench v0.55.0 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou merged PR #47048: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47048 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.or

Re: [PR] GH-47047: [CI][C++] Use Google Cloud Storage Testbench v0.55.0 [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47048: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47048#issuecomment-3059952074 +1 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: [I] [Release] release_candidate.yml refers nonexistent variables [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on issue #47063: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/47063#issuecomment-3059932962 Issue resolved by pull request 47064 https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47064 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [PR] GH-47063: [Release] Define missing RELEASE_TARBALL [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou merged PR #47064: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47064 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.or

Re: [PR] GH-38211: [MATLAB] Add support for creating an empty `arrow.tabular.RecordBatch` by calling `arrow.recordBatch` with no input arguments [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #47060: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47060#issuecomment-3059933148 After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit a23c2c7f5268c516a48b30940ae77c4137b4b495. There were no

Re: [PR] GH-47063: [Release] Define missing RELEASE_TARBALL [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47064: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47064#issuecomment-3059927098 :warning: GitHub issue #47063 **has been automatically assigned in GitHub** to PR creator. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

Re: [PR] GH-47063: [Release] Define missing RELEASE_TARBALL [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47064: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47064#issuecomment-3059926922 +1 RC1 is failed by this problem. I'll try this fix with RC2. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t

Re: [PR] GH-470613 [Release] Define missing RELEASE_TARBALL [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47064: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47064#issuecomment-3059925443 :x: GitHub issue #470613 could not be retrieved. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the U

[PR] GH-470613 [Release] Define missing RELEASE_TARBALL [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou opened a new pull request, #47064: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47064 ### Rationale for this change `RELEASE_TARBALL` is registered to `GITHUB_ENV` but isn't defined in this context. ### What changes are included in this PR? Define `RELEASE_TARBARLL`.

Re: [PR] [Variant] Speedup validation [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
friendlymatthew commented on code in PR #7878: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7878#discussion_r2199265078 ## parquet-variant/src/variant/list.rs: ## @@ -209,9 +208,35 @@ impl<'m, 'v> VariantList<'m, 'v> { // by value to all the children (who would othe

Re: [PR] [Variant] Speedup validation [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
friendlymatthew commented on code in PR #7878: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7878#discussion_r2199265078 ## parquet-variant/src/variant/list.rs: ## @@ -209,9 +208,35 @@ impl<'m, 'v> VariantList<'m, 'v> { // by value to all the children (who would othe

Re: [PR] [Variant] Speedup validation [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
friendlymatthew commented on code in PR #7878: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7878#discussion_r2199251737 ## parquet-variant/src/decoder.rs: ## @@ -200,6 +200,24 @@ impl OffsetSizeBytes { } } +pub(crate) fn map_bytes_to_offsets( Review Comment: Sounds g

Re: [I] [Release] Automated release signing CI uses wrong variable name [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on issue #47061: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/47061#issuecomment-3059876319 Issue resolved by pull request 47062 https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47062 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [PR] GH-47061: [Release] Fix wrong variable name for signing [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou merged PR #47062: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47062 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.or

Re: [PR] GH-47061: [Release] Fix wrong variable name for signing [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou commented on PR #47062: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47062#issuecomment-3059857411 +1 RC0 failed by this problem. I'll try this fix as RC1. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the UR

Re: [PR] Support multi-threaded writing of Parquet files with modular encryption [arrow-rs]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
adamreeve commented on code in PR #7818: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7818#discussion_r2199233416 ## parquet/src/file/properties.rs: ## @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ pub struct WriterPropertiesBuilder { impl WriterPropertiesBuilder { /// Returns default state of th

Re: [PR] GH-47061: [Release] Fix wrong variable name for signing [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #47062: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47062#issuecomment-3059856832 :warning: GitHub issue #47061 **has been automatically assigned in GitHub** to PR creator. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

[PR] GH-47061: [Release] Fix wrong variable name for signing [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
kou opened a new pull request, #47062: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/47062 ### Rationale for this change We must use GPG key ID not GPG key itself for `gpg --local-user`. ### What changes are included in this PR? Use `ARROW_GPG_KEY_UID`. ### Are these c

Re: [PR] GH-46728: [Python] Skip test_gdb.py tests if PyArrow wasn't built debug [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
dinse commented on code in PR #46755: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46755#discussion_r2199073574 ## python/pyarrow/includes/libarrow_python_config.pxd: ## @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one Review Comment: I am new to C

Re: [PR] chore: fix typo [arrow-adbc]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
lidavidm merged PR #3129: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/3129 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.a

Re: [PR] Fix for URI generation issue #434 [arrow-rs-object-store]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
tustvold commented on code in PR #435: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store/pull/435#discussion_r2199018452 ## src/client/builder.rs: ## @@ -181,9 +181,28 @@ impl HttpRequestBuilder { pub(crate) fn query(mut self, query: &T) -> Self { let mut erro

Re: [PR] fix(go/adbc/pkg): add PowerShell option to run when executing in a Windows-based ADO pipeline [arrow-adbc]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
lidavidm merged PR #3124: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/3124 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.a

Re: [PR] fix(go/adbc/pkg): add PowerShell option to run when executing in a Windows-based ADO pipeline [arrow-adbc]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
zeroshade commented on PR #3124: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/3124#issuecomment-3059554892 Looks good! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [PR] fix(go/adbc/pkg): add PowerShell option to run when executing in a Windows-based ADO pipeline [arrow-adbc]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
davidhcoe commented on PR #3124: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/3124#issuecomment-3059550152 ok, all set. The PowerShell output looks like: ``` PS C:\[...]\pkg> make libadbc_driver_snowflake.dll go build -buildvcs=true -tags driverlib -o libadbc_driver_snowflake.d

Re: [PR] GH-46860: [C++] Making HalfFloatBuilder accept Float16 as well as uint16_t [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
dinse commented on code in PR #46981: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46981#discussion_r2198997136 ## cpp/src/arrow/array/array_test.cc: ## @@ -4075,4 +4078,72 @@ TYPED_TEST(TestPrimitiveArray, IndexOperator) { } } +class TestHalfFloatBuilder : public ::testing::

Re: [PR] GH-46860: [C++] Making HalfFloatBuilder accept Float16 as well as uint16_t [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
dinse commented on code in PR #46981: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46981#discussion_r2198994780 ## docs/source/cpp/api/builder.rst: ## @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ Primitive .. doxygenclass:: arrow::BooleanBuilder :members: +.. doxygenclass:: arrow::HalfFloatBuilder Re

Re: [PR] GH-46860: [C++] Making HalfFloatBuilder accept Float16 as well as uint16_t [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
dinse commented on code in PR #46981: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46981#discussion_r2198994601 ## cpp/src/arrow/array/builder_primitive.h: ## @@ -384,6 +384,101 @@ using DurationBuilder = NumericBuilder; /// @} +class ARROW_EXPORT HalfFloatBuilder : public Num

Re: [PR] GH-46860: [C++] Making HalfFloatBuilder accept Float16 as well as uint16_t [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
dinse commented on code in PR #46981: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46981#discussion_r2198992783 ## cpp/src/arrow/array/array_test.cc: ## @@ -4075,4 +4078,72 @@ TYPED_TEST(TestPrimitiveArray, IndexOperator) { } } +class TestHalfFloatBuilder : public ::testing::

Re: [PR] GH-46860: [C++] Making HalfFloatBuilder accept Float16 as well as uint16_t [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
dinse commented on code in PR #46981: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46981#discussion_r2198992326 ## cpp/src/arrow/array/array_test.cc: ## @@ -4075,4 +4078,72 @@ TYPED_TEST(TestPrimitiveArray, IndexOperator) { } } +class TestHalfFloatBuilder : public ::testing::

Re: [PR] GH-46860: [C++] Making HalfFloatBuilder accept Float16 as well as uint16_t [arrow]

2025-07-10 Thread via GitHub
dinse commented on code in PR #46981: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46981#discussion_r2198990771 ## cpp/src/arrow/array/array_test.cc: ## @@ -4075,4 +4078,72 @@ TYPED_TEST(TestPrimitiveArray, IndexOperator) { } } +class TestHalfFloatBuilder : public ::testing::

  1   2   3   4   >