romainfrancois commented on pull request #8650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8650#issuecomment-756833600
Now pulled in the commit from #8886 so that this uses `Converter::Extend()`
instead of the R specific previous `AppendRange()`.
I believe that for the chunker class
romainfrancois commented on pull request #8650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8650#issuecomment-756833600
Now pulled in the commit from #8886 so that this uses `Converter::Extend()`
instead of the R specific previous `AppendRange()`.
I believe that for the chunker class
romainfrancois commented on pull request #8650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8650#issuecomment-755350170
At the point now where I dropped the artificial `Rscalar` class and all goes
through `AppendRange()` which is only slightly different from @kszucs take on
#8886.
romainfrancois commented on pull request #8650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8650#issuecomment-740504045
I believe `AppendMultiple()` is what I would be looking for. It would e.g.
solve my dilemma about converting data frames to struct types ...
I had missed the more
romainfrancois commented on pull request #8650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8650#issuecomment-734843309
ping @kszucs @bkietz I don't necessarily need a full review at this point,
as this is far from done and will need further changes, but perhaps you can
have a look and let
romainfrancois commented on pull request #8650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8650#issuecomment-734746906
This is still quite wip, as I navigate how the various `Converter` work
together.
It all feels a bit weird to operate in terms of single values, i.e. via the
romainfrancois commented on pull request #8650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8650#issuecomment-726789546
``` r
library(arrow, warn.conflicts = FALSE)
arrow:::vec_to_arrow(1:2, int32())
#> Array
#>
#> [
#> 1,
#> 2
#> ]
romainfrancois commented on pull request #8650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8650#issuecomment-726775206
Thanks @kszucs for the direct help. This is very far from done, but it's a
start, and perhaps we can resume the conversation here.
AFAIK, There is no R equivalent
