dharanad commented on PR #11487:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11487#issuecomment-2235730350
@jayzhan211 I apologize for any confusion caused by submitting multiple
reviews. I was mistaken in believing I had the latest changes from the `main`
branch. This revision incorpora
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682248395
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/spill.rs:
##
@@ -85,3 +85,104 @@ fn read_spill(sender: Sender>, path:
&Path) -> Result<()> {
}
Ok(())
}
+
+/// Spill the
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682246227
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -1544,6 +1646,7 @@ fn get_filtered_join_mask(
// we don't need to check any others for the
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682245542
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -1502,13 +1572,45 @@ fn get_buffered_columns(
buffered_data: &BufferedData,
buffered_batch
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682243474
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -1502,13 +1572,45 @@ fn get_buffered_columns(
buffered_data: &BufferedData,
buffered_batch
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682241988
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -941,6 +1020,7 @@ impl SMJStream {
self.buffered_state = BufferedSt
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682236590
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -858,6 +889,57 @@ impl SMJStream {
}
}
+fn free_reservation(&mut self, buffered_
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682230886
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -858,6 +889,57 @@ impl SMJStream {
}
}
+fn free_reservation(&mut self, buffered_
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682227159
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -858,6 +889,57 @@ impl SMJStream {
}
}
+fn free_reservation(&mut self, buffered_
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r168150
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -858,6 +889,57 @@ impl SMJStream {
}
}
+fn free_reservation(&mut self, buffered_
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682196532
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -858,6 +889,57 @@ impl SMJStream {
}
}
+fn free_reservation(&mut self, buffered_
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682192033
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/sort_merge_join.rs:
##
@@ -250,7 +250,12 @@ impl DisplayAs for SortMergeJoinExec {
write!(
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682189556
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/spill.rs:
##
@@ -85,3 +85,104 @@ fn read_spill(sender: Sender>, path:
&Path) -> Result<()> {
}
Ok(())
}
+
+/// Spill the
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682186911
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/spill.rs:
##
@@ -85,3 +85,104 @@ fn read_spill(sender: Sender>, path:
&Path) -> Result<()> {
}
Ok(())
}
+
+/// Spill the
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #11522:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11522#issuecomment-2235538061
Does that work for your use case? I vaguely remember `VariadicAny` is set to
>=1 argument for some reason 🤔
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/b0925c801e1c07bd78c7
viirya commented on code in PR #11218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11218#discussion_r1682183243
##
datafusion/core/tests/memory_limit/mod.rs:
##
@@ -180,6 +180,26 @@ async fn merge_join() {
])
.with_memory_limit(1_000)
.with_config(c
dharanad commented on code in PR #11487:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11487#discussion_r1682131864
##
datafusion/sql/examples/sql.rs:
##
@@ -54,7 +55,8 @@ fn main() {
let context_provider = MyContextProvider::new()
.with_udaf(sum_udaf())
andygrove merged PR #676:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/676
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@da
andygrove closed issue #617: Enable all ignored Spark SQL tests for Spark 3.5.1
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/617
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
dharanad commented on code in PR #11487:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11487#discussion_r1682102315
##
datafusion/optimizer/tests/optimizer_integration.rs:
##
@@ -344,7 +345,8 @@ fn test_sql(sql: &str) -> Result {
.with_udaf(sum_udaf())
.with_u
codecov-commenter commented on PR #678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/678#issuecomment-2235261640
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/678?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campai
andygrove commented on code in PR #676:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/676#discussion_r1682062114
##
dev/diffs/3.5.1.diff:
##
@@ -2120,29 +2120,17 @@ index 746f289c393..bc01ffd52ea 100644
checkAnswer(aggDF, df1.groupBy("j").agg(max("k")))
}
andygrove commented on code in PR #676:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/676#discussion_r1682052948
##
dev/diffs/3.5.1.diff:
##
@@ -2120,29 +2120,17 @@ index 746f289c393..bc01ffd52ea 100644
checkAnswer(aggDF, df1.groupBy("j").agg(max("k")))
}
andygrove commented on code in PR #676:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/676#discussion_r1682052523
##
dev/diffs/3.5.1.diff:
##
@@ -2120,29 +2120,17 @@ index 746f289c393..bc01ffd52ea 100644
checkAnswer(aggDF, df1.groupBy("j").agg(max("k")))
}
xinlifoobar commented on PR #11491:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11491#issuecomment-2235157160
> Thanks -- sorry for the back and forth @xinlifoobar - I think we could
make this simpler, But if you are sick of changing things, that is fine too and
I can make a follow on PR
xinlifoobar commented on code in PR #11491:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11491#discussion_r1681999516
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/analyzer/type_coercion.rs:
##
@@ -103,6 +104,20 @@ fn analyze_internal(
// select t2.c2 from t1 where t1.c1 in (select t2.c1 f
xinlifoobar commented on code in PR #11330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11330#discussion_r1681972108
##
datafusion/sql/src/statement.rs:
##
@@ -1080,6 +1017,33 @@ impl<'a, S: ContextProvider> SqlToRel<'a, S> {
)))
}
+fn parse_options_map(
+
goldmedal commented on code in PR #11452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11452#discussion_r1681967883
##
datafusion/functions-array/src/make_array.rs:
##
@@ -131,6 +138,77 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for MakeArray {
}
}
+#[derive(Debug)]
+pub struct MakeArraySt
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #11526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11526#discussion_r1681965049
##
datafusion/functions/src/core/map.rs:
##
@@ -75,33 +75,31 @@ fn make_map(args: &[ColumnarValue]) ->
Result {
make_map_batch_internal(key, value, can_ev
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #11526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11526#discussion_r1681964481
##
datafusion/sql/src/expr/function.rs:
##
@@ -229,8 +229,23 @@ impl<'a, S: ContextProvider> SqlToRel<'a, S> {
// user-defined function (UDF) should
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #11526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11526#discussion_r1681964078
##
datafusion/functions/src/core/map.rs:
##
@@ -75,33 +75,31 @@ fn make_map(args: &[ColumnarValue]) ->
Result {
make_map_batch_internal(key, value, can_ev
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #11452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11452#discussion_r1681963551
##
datafusion/functions-array/src/make_array.rs:
##
@@ -131,6 +138,77 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for MakeArray {
}
}
+#[derive(Debug)]
+pub struct MakeArrayS
jayzhan211 opened a new pull request, #11526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11526
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes tested
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #11452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11452#discussion_r1681932892
##
datafusion/functions-array/src/make_array.rs:
##
@@ -131,6 +138,77 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for MakeArray {
}
}
+#[derive(Debug)]
+pub struct MakeArrayS
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #676:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/676#discussion_r1681941216
##
dev/diffs/3.5.1.diff:
##
@@ -2120,29 +2120,17 @@ index 746f289c393..bc01ffd52ea 100644
checkAnswer(aggDF, df1.groupBy("j").agg(max("k")))
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #11452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11452#discussion_r1681932892
##
datafusion/functions-array/src/make_array.rs:
##
@@ -131,6 +138,77 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for MakeArray {
}
}
+#[derive(Debug)]
+pub struct MakeArrayS
andygrove merged PR #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/671
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@da
jayzhan211 commented on PR #11516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11516#issuecomment-2234919555
I think `CatalogSession` is not the minimum dependency, what is the reason
to replace all the SessionState with CatalogSession
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Gi
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #11452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11452#discussion_r1681920330
##
datafusion/functions-array/src/make_array.rs:
##
@@ -131,6 +138,77 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for MakeArray {
}
}
+#[derive(Debug)]
+pub struct MakeArrayS
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #11487:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11487#discussion_r1681912874
##
datafusion/optimizer/tests/optimizer_integration.rs:
##
@@ -344,7 +345,8 @@ fn test_sql(sql: &str) -> Result {
.with_udaf(sum_udaf())
.with
andygrove commented on code in PR #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/671#discussion_r1681869984
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/benchmark/CometTPCDSMicroBenchmark.scala:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
kazuyukitanimura commented on issue #663:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/663#issuecomment-2234546414
We should fix in the upstream
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11108
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
kazuyukitanimura commented on issue #665:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/665#issuecomment-2234527628
Will be addressed with https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/585
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/671#discussion_r1681836876
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/benchmark/CometTPCDSMicroBenchmark.scala:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
parthchandra commented on issue #679:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/679#issuecomment-2234431447
It might be that the assignment to `Decimal.longVal` (or `Decimal.intVal`)
in `Decimal.createUnsafe` is copying data from native to Jvm memory and that
has a performance
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/678#discussion_r1681803041
##
dev/diffs/4.0.0-preview1.diff:
##
@@ -938,16 +938,42 @@ index 68f14f13bbd..4b8e967102f 100644
}
assert(exchanges.size === 1)
}
alamb commented on code in PR #11491:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11491#discussion_r1681816119
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/analyzer/type_coercion.rs:
##
@@ -103,6 +104,20 @@ fn analyze_internal(
// select t2.c2 from t1 where t1.c1 in (select t2.c1 from t2
andygrove commented on code in PR #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/671#discussion_r1681816431
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/benchmark/CometTPCDSMicroBenchmark.scala:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
andygrove commented on issue #679:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/679#issuecomment-2234380204
This is the flamegraph where Comet is performing scan + exec. Because the
hash aggregate is operating on Arrow data, we no longer see lots of decimals
being accessed from J
findepi commented on PR #11516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11516#issuecomment-2234372485
Eventually all green.
@jayzhan211 @alamb @comphead you may want to take a look
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
andygrove commented on issue #679:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/679#issuecomment-2234367885
Here is the full flamegraph. The hash aggregate is running in Spark, so
maybe it is not surprising that so much time is in calls to getDecimal

--
This is an automated message from the Apach
parthchandra commented on code in PR #604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/604#discussion_r1681728168
##
native/core/src/parquet/read/levels.rs:
##
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ impl LevelDecoder {
match self.mode {
Mode::RLE => {
wiedld commented on issue #11042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11042#issuecomment-2234271367
> I also found https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5828 which might be
related and/or relevant.
@hveiga is correct that this is one suspected place with extra memory
alamb commented on issue #11042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11042#issuecomment-2234270402
Also spoiler alert is that @wiedld is in the process of harmonizing the
default configuration for the parquet writer and the arrow settings as part of
https://github.com/apache/d
comphead commented on issue #11496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11496#issuecomment-2234269846
nw, folks, I shoulda added the PR dependency manually, nw, I already
resolved it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
wiedld commented on PR #11524:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11524#issuecomment-2234260902
Coincidentally, the treatment of these defaults [just came up in
discussion](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11042#issuecomment-2234244223)
regarding memory debugging. Wha
wiedld commented on issue #11042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11042#issuecomment-2234244223
> I wonder if this could be related to DataFusion overriding the
data_page_row_limit setting in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11367 (that @wiedld is working on)
parthchandra commented on PR #678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/678#issuecomment-2234238920
@kazuyukitanimura Ready for your review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
andygrove commented on PR #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/671#issuecomment-2234226194
> However, this path would be hit only for precision > 18 or if
`spark.comet.use.decimal128` was set to `true` (it is `false` by default).
The fields have precision 7 and I
andygrove commented on PR #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/671#issuecomment-2234221966
> Just looking at this one case, with decimal fields and only scan enabled,
we are much slower. This is consistent with something I saw when working on the
parallel reader.
>
comphead opened a new pull request, #11525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11525
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
If the `test_enabled_backtrace` launched without `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` the test
will fail with the
parthchandra commented on PR #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/671#issuecomment-2234180553
> TPCDS Micro Benchmarks: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms)
Stdev(ms)Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
>
---
alamb commented on PR #9015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/9015#issuecomment-2234162615
My concern with this PR was that I could not quite convince myself / find
the time to ensure the complexity was necessary... I feel bad we didn't find
time to get it over the line. Maybe
tinfoil-knight commented on PR #11330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11330#issuecomment-2234156327
@xinlifoobar Could you cleanup the commit history? Avoid using rebase. Just
create a merge commit (if really necessary) w/ the `main` branch.
--
This is an automated message
alamb commented on code in PR #11483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11483#discussion_r1679347111
##
datafusion/core/src/physical_optimizer/pruning.rs:
##
@@ -736,12 +738,22 @@ impl RequiredColumns {
Self::default()
}
-/// Returns number of un
alamb commented on code in PR #11483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11483#discussion_r1681651905
##
datafusion/core/src/physical_optimizer/pruning.rs:
##
@@ -736,12 +738,22 @@ impl RequiredColumns {
Self::default()
}
-/// Returns number of un
kavirajk commented on issue #11445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11445#issuecomment-2234147415
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To u
parthchandra commented on PR #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/671#issuecomment-2234142009
> Can we also commit the benchmark results (as we do for the other
microbenchmarks)? That way we can keep an eye open for any performance
regressions.
I was under the i
wiedld opened a new pull request, #11524:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11524
## Which issue does this PR close?
Part of #11367
This PR defines the current state.
## Rationale for this change
When we switched from using the parquet's ArrowWriter (with
andygrove commented on code in PR #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/671#discussion_r1681640222
##
spark/src/test/resources/tpcds-micro-benchmarks/add_many_decimals.sql:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+-
wiedld commented on issue #11523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11523#issuecomment-2234117616
> The message is quite confusing and we can probably make it better,
mentioning requested, used, allocated and remaining mem. But I'm not sure if
there is an easy way to what tak
wiedld commented on PR #9015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/9015#issuecomment-2234109663
Note that the need for some tracking of memory consumers has been [raised
again](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11523). Not sure if we plan
on reviving/reusing some of the
comphead commented on issue #11523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11523#issuecomment-2234109473
The message is quite confusing and we can probably make it better,
mentioning requested, used, allocated and remaining mem. But I'm not sure if
there is an easy way to what tak
andygrove commented on PR #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/671#issuecomment-2234106564
For reference, here are the results from running with sf=100gb data on my
Linux workstation.
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.23+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu122.04.1 on Linux
andygrove commented on issue #670:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/670#issuecomment-2234100899
Benchmark runs @ sf=100 suggest that reading decimal from parquet could
potentially be a performance issue.
```
TPCDS Micro Benchmarks: Best Time
findepi commented on issue #11496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11496#issuecomment-2234098647
i think you did alright (otherwise, how would you keep track of the
follow-up issues without creating them).
maybe i created the PR too early. apologies @comphead
--
This
alamb commented on issue #11496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11496#issuecomment-2234097093
Sorry!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
comphead commented on issue #11457:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11457#issuecomment-2234094573
Depends on #11218
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
kazuyukitanimura commented on PR #604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/604#issuecomment-2234069067
@parthchandra @andygrove
I have added a relevant change to fix one more test after your approvals
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/604/commits/3659f0ad0e
kazuyukitanimura commented on PR #604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/604#issuecomment-2234064490
> Thanks @kazuyukitanimura I'm wondering should be have tests to read those
types?
Thanks @comphead
Spark's `ParquetTypeWideningSuite` has a good coverage
--
T
comphead commented on issue #11496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11496#issuecomment-2234063802
I created this issue too early as it will create conflicts in #11218 😁
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
alamb commented on issue #11523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11523#issuecomment-2234060771
I agree this message is quite confusing
There is a related idea here I think
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/6934
I think @westonpace mentioned something
kazuyukitanimura commented on PR #604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/604#issuecomment-2234060800
> btw, this is really a `feat` not a `fix` :)
updated
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/604#discussion_r1681603572
##
native/core/src/parquet/read/values.rs:
##
@@ -506,6 +610,21 @@ macro_rules! generate_cast_to_signed {
generate_cast_to_signed!(copy_i32_to_i8, i32,
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/604#discussion_r1681602065
##
native/core/src/parquet/read/values.rs:
##
@@ -285,6 +261,59 @@ impl PlainDecoding for Int32DateType {
}
}
+impl PlainDecoding for Int32Times
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo