xudong963 commented on issue #16383:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16383#issuecomment-2965317151
After this is fixed, we can publish sqllogictest, because it depends on
spark ♾
```
cd datafusion/sqllogictest && cargo publish --allow-dirty
Updating crates.io i
berkaysynnada commented on PR #15770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15770#issuecomment-2965256342
I couldn't find much time on upstream issues lately @adriangb, sorry for
that. But I'll certainly take a look at this asap
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
zhuqi-lucas commented on issue #16353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16353#issuecomment-2965191039
> Figured it out. File access is done via object store and object store uses
`std::fs::File`, not `tokio::fs::File`. Even if it would, from browsing the
code it doesn't look
alamb merged PR #16340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16340
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #1880:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1880#issuecomment-2965080828
woohoo
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
alamb commented on PR #16368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16368#issuecomment-2965079051
Sweet -- no updates requires
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
alamb commented on PR #16345:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16345#issuecomment-2965076495
It looks to me like this PR is ready to merge, though it does look like
there is some potential follow on ideas in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16345#discussion_r21393202
alamb commented on PR #16345:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16345#issuecomment-2965076627
Thanks again everyone!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
alamb commented on PR #16322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16322#issuecomment-2965063028
Thanks again @pepijnve @Dandandan @ozankabak and @zhuqi-lucas
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
alamb commented on PR #16322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16322#issuecomment-2965062758
> I just checked, and SortExec is also setting up RecordBatchReceiverStream.
The worst case scenario in terms of elapsed time in the poll_next call is that
all 10k streams are ready in
alamb commented on issue #16383:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16383#issuecomment-2965049836
I have a PR to fix it here (found while writing tests):
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16384
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
alamb commented on issue #15915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15915#issuecomment-2965058111
I made a PR for this issue -- it was a bit trickier than I expected
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16384
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
alamb opened a new issue, #16383:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16383
### Describe the bug
Filing a ticket for something @xudong963 hit today (I can't remember where
this was mentioned):
When trying to publish the `datafusion-spark` crate it generates the
f
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #15307: #5483
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15307
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mai
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #16367:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16367#issuecomment-2964856125
> * CPU / I/O tradeoff when `zstd` or `lz4_frame` compression is enabled
i.e. compression ratio, extra latency spent for compression
It's worth doing some micro-benches
2010YOUY01 commented on code in PR #16268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16268#discussion_r2141401180
##
datafusion/common/src/config.rs:
##
@@ -274,6 +276,60 @@ config_namespace! {
}
}
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
+pub enum SpillCompres
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #15306: Secure GitHub Actions by using
specific SHA hashes
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15306
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #15392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15392#issuecomment-2964785768
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or comment or
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #15324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15324#issuecomment-2964785938
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or comment or
andygrove merged PR #1860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1860
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@
andygrove closed issue #1843: Spark Test fails `vectorized reader: missing all
struct fields`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1843
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
jonathanc-n commented on issue #16364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16364#issuecomment-2964570048
Yeah this was much needed thanks for bringing this up @UBarney
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Git
alamb opened a new pull request, #16382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16382
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16378
## Rationale for this change
As described on https://github.com/apache/datafusion/is
alamb commented on issue #16378:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16378#issuecomment-2964559250
Here is a proposed fix:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16382
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
parthchandra commented on PR #1815:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1815#issuecomment-2964554260
Removed commented out code that is no longer needed. Thanks for the second
review @andygrove. Will merge after ci completes
--
This is an automated message from the Apach
alamb commented on code in PR #16381:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16381#discussion_r2141267569
##
.github/workflows/extended.yml:
##
@@ -100,7 +100,10 @@ jobs:
df -h
- name: Run tests (excluding doctests)
env:
- RUST_BACKTRA
alamb closed pull request #16381: Fix CI tests by disabling AWS metadata
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16381
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
alamb commented on code in PR #16381:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16381#discussion_r2141267569
##
.github/workflows/extended.yml:
##
@@ -100,7 +100,10 @@ jobs:
df -h
- name: Run tests (excluding doctests)
env:
- RUST_BACKTRA
alamb closed issue #15771: Release DataFusion `48.0.0` (June 2025)
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15771
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
alamb commented on issue #15771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15771#issuecomment-2964540689
We have released to crates.io so I think we are all good here now:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15915
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
alamb merged PR #16333:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16333
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb merged PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16356
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb merged PR #16376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16376
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #16375: datafusion-sqllogictest 48.0.0 can't be published
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16375
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
alamb opened a new pull request, #16381:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16381
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16378
## Rationale for this change
The way credentials are resolved on AWS builders ha
alamb commented on issue #16378:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16378#issuecomment-2964510793
I think the problem is that prior to
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16300 we wouldn't actually fetch the
credential provider until it was needed, which it is not for th
andygrove commented on code in PR #1815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1815#discussion_r2141233325
##
common/src/main/java/org/apache/comet/parquet/NativeBatchReader.java:
##
@@ -424,6 +425,187 @@ public void init() throws Throwable {
isInitialized =
andygrove commented on code in PR #1815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1815#discussion_r2141233094
##
common/src/main/java/org/apache/comet/parquet/NativeBatchReader.java:
##
@@ -424,6 +425,187 @@ public void init() throws Throwable {
isInitialized =
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16083:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16083#discussion_r2141219041
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/optimize_projections/mod.rs:
##
@@ -704,7 +704,8 @@ fn split_join_requirements(
| JoinType::Left
| JoinType::Righ
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16380#discussion_r2141169183
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/hash_join.rs:
##
@@ -1372,15 +1407,16 @@ pub fn equal_rows_arr(
// The results are then folded (combined) using the
pepijnve commented on issue #16353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16353#issuecomment-2964427447
Figured it out. File access is done via object store and object store uses
`std::fs::File`, not `tokio::fs::File`. Even if it would, from browsing the
code it doesn't look to m
jonathanc-n commented on PR #16380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16380#issuecomment-2964423579
I've noticed that it is possible for `interleave` to perform worse than
`take` despite the `Arc` clones from `take`. This happens twice as well for
`equal_row_arr` and `build_bat
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16210#discussion_r2141190301
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/nested_loop_join.rs:
##
@@ -178,6 +187,18 @@ pub struct NestedLoopJoinExec {
metrics: ExecutionPlanMetricsSet,
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16210#discussion_r2141190301
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/nested_loop_join.rs:
##
@@ -178,6 +187,18 @@ pub struct NestedLoopJoinExec {
metrics: ExecutionPlanMetricsSet,
andygrove closed pull request #1872: docs: Update Iceberg docs [wip]
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1872
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
andygrove closed issue #1871: Tests are failing in Miri CI workflow
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1871
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
andygrove merged PR #1873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1873
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@
alamb commented on issue #15914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15914#issuecomment-2964398777
> We add a CI workflow that is triggered when Spark functions SLT files are
changed, to make sure they are generated without unintended manual modification.
I am not quite s
alamb commented on issue #15914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15914#issuecomment-2964396824
I just had a chat with @shehabgamin
The current status is that we have not smoothed out the process to the point
where contributors with minimal context can pick up a port
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16380#discussion_r2141169183
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/hash_join.rs:
##
@@ -1372,15 +1407,16 @@ pub fn equal_rows_arr(
// The results are then folded (combined) using the
andygrove commented on PR #1860:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1860#issuecomment-2964357089
miri failure due to https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1871
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
andygrove commented on PR #1873:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1873#issuecomment-2964350953
@kazuyukitanimura @parthchandra @huaxingao could I get a committer review?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16380#discussion_r2141135830
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/hash_join.rs:
##
@@ -95,9 +96,11 @@ struct JoinLeftData {
/// The hash table with indices into `batch`
hash_map
jonathanc-n opened a new pull request, #16380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16380
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes tes
alamb commented on issue #16378:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16378#issuecomment-2964249245
After adding more information in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16379 , we get:
```
exec::tests::copy_to_external_object_store_test stdout
Err
alamb commented on PR #16350:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16350#issuecomment-2964195828
FYI @shehabgamin
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
mbutrovich commented on PR #1862:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1862#issuecomment-2964065141
Last thing I am waiting on is to do a new set of Spark diffs to turn off
native RangePartitioning in the 3 bucketing-related tests. Because of the
different random number gen
alamb commented on PR #16379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16379#issuecomment-2964036306
Let's get some data
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
blaginin commented on code in PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16324#discussion_r2141000796
##
datafusion/core/tests/sql/explain_analyze.rs:
##
@@ -52,43 +54,45 @@ async fn explain_analyze_baseline_metrics() {
let formatted = arrow::util::pretty::pr
pepijnve commented on issue #16353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16353#issuecomment-2964042212
Some more information to share and time to eat some humble pie for me.
Google led me to a [withoutboats
post](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/runtime-agnostic-cooperative-tas
alamb commented on PR #16379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16379#issuecomment-2964037509
Let's get some data
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
alamb merged PR #16379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16379
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1872:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1872#issuecomment-2964016404
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1872?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
pepijnve commented on PR #16319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16319#issuecomment-2963849416
I did a second identical run because those result seemed just too good to be
true to me. This is much closer to what I was expecting: more or less status
quo. That does mean I'm bac
krishvishal commented on PR #16203:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16203#issuecomment-2963817531
@comphead, can you please tell if there is something I can do to move this
forward? Are there any relevant benches I could either run or adapt for this
case?
--
This is an aut
alamb closed issue #15182: June 2025 ASF Board Report
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15182
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-m
alamb commented on issue #16353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16353#issuecomment-2963580078
> Sorry, I usually do this around a white board.
Yeah I agree doing this kind of thing with a whiteboard is easier. I am
happy to set up a video call with the relevant part
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1873:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1873#issuecomment-2963656751
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1873?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
alamb opened a new issue, #16378:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16378
### Describe the bug
CI is failing on main after merging
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16300
Example failure:
```text
failures:
exec::tests::copy_to_extern
Chen-Yuan-Lai commented on code in PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16324#discussion_r2140683717
##
datafusion/core/tests/sql/explain_analyze.rs:
##
@@ -52,43 +54,45 @@ async fn explain_analyze_baseline_metrics() {
let formatted = arrow::util::prett
xudong963 opened a new pull request, #16376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16376
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16375
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in thi
andygrove commented on issue #1871:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1871#issuecomment-2963580260
Possibly relevent info: https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/4208
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
alamb commented on issue #15182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15182#issuecomment-2963675796
REport was submitted. Here is the final copy:
```
## Description:
The mission of Apache DataFusion is the creation and maintenance of software
related to an extensi
Blizzara commented on code in PR #16345:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16345#discussion_r2140656890
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer/utils.rs:
##
@@ -81,98 +81,167 @@ pub(super) fn next_struct_field_name(
}
}
-pub(super) fn rename_field(
pepijnve commented on PR #16319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16319#issuecomment-2963861479
🤦♂️ that's not very useful now is it. I need a better machine to test on
min/avg/max
```
1887.14 / 2104.13 ±982.87 / 8971.27 ms │ 1893.19 / 1949.39 ±31.69 /
2057.5
blaginin commented on PR #16379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16379#issuecomment-2963679090
So strange! Passing for me locally as well, maybe some env variables..
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
andygrove opened a new pull request, #1873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1873
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## How are these changes
alamb commented on PR #16300:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16300#issuecomment-2963654832
There appears to be some problem with this code in PR:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16378
I have another PR up to add some better error messages to debug:
- ht
alamb commented on issue #16323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16323#issuecomment-2963432937
FYI @xudong963 -- perhaps you can send invites to @andygrove and myself when
that is published
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
xudong963 commented on issue #16323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16323#issuecomment-2963445724
Some errors:
```
Packaging datafusion-spark v48.0.0
(/Users/xudong/opensource/datafusion/datafusion/spark)
Updating crates.io index
Packaged 38 files, 14
alamb commented on code in PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16324#discussion_r2140697002
##
datafusion/core/tests/sql/explain_analyze.rs:
##
@@ -52,43 +54,45 @@ async fn explain_analyze_baseline_metrics() {
let formatted = arrow::util::pretty::prett
xudong963 commented on issue #16323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16323#issuecomment-2963519484
Okay, I'll do it tomorrow, with sqllogictest crate, (a bit late now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
alamb commented on issue #16323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16323#issuecomment-2963482791
> Some errors when I tried to pulish the spark crate:
It looks like the datafusion-spark crate is missing some features of the
`datafusion_functions` crate (`crypto`
alamb merged PR #16377:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16377
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on issue #16353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16353#issuecomment-2963478363
> I see this as a Stream implementation problem.
I see the wisdom of this view.
In my mind I think the DataFusion philosophy is "keep the barrier to entry
as low as
xudong963 opened a new pull request, #16377:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16377
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
The command is missing some crates and the order of it is wrong.
## What ch
alamb opened a new pull request, #16379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16379
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Follow on to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16300
- Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16378
## Rationale for this ch
alamb commented on PR #16377:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16377#issuecomment-2963613954
Thank you @xudong963 and @andygrove
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
alamb opened a new issue, #16374:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16374
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
One of the common criticisms of parquet based query systems is that they
don't have some particular type of index (e.g. HyperLogLog a
xudong963 opened a new issue, #16375:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16375
```
cd datafusion/sqllogictest && cargo publish
Updating crates.io index
error: all dependencies must have a version specified when publishing.
dependency `datafusion-substrait` does n
pepijnve commented on issue #16353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16353#issuecomment-2963507764
@alamb our messages crossed paths in the ether.
> I have somewhat lost track of what exactly you are proposing.
Sorry, I usually do this around a white board. First
alamb commented on issue #16353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16353#issuecomment-2963459115
> At the risk of making myself unpopular, I feel it's relevant to share my
findings with you guys.
Not at all --- this is great stuff -- thank you @pepijnve for continuing t
pepijnve commented on issue #16353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16353#issuecomment-2963459881
@zhuqi-lucas it would be useful to have some additional voices in this
discussion. I can share my opinion, but it's only one opinion. I feel like I'm
just going to keep repeati
iffyio merged PR #1880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1880
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
iffyio merged PR #1881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1881
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
andygrove commented on issue #16323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16323#issuecomment-2963353039
The `datafusion-spark` crate will be new in this release, so we'll need to
update permissions on that once it is created.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
alamb commented on PR #74:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/74#issuecomment-2963320742
Thank you @akurmustafa and @timsaucer
I hope to publish these posts in a few days if there are no more comments
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
zhuqi-lucas commented on issue #16370:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16370#issuecomment-2963309637
Submitted a PR for review:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16373
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pl
alamb commented on code in PR #74:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/74#discussion_r2140516503
##
content/blog/2025-06-15-optimizing-sql-dataframes-part-one.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Optimizing SQL (and DataFrames) in DataFusion, Part
zhuqi-lucas opened a new pull request, #16373:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16373
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes [#16370](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16370)
## Rationale for this change
1. tpch data generate for csv forma
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
