2010YOUY01 commented on PR #16463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16463#issuecomment-2990142949
Thank you! This is great. I got some minor suggestions:
1. The issue explained the motivation of the change clearly, I recommend to
add the same rationale to the code commen
rishvin commented on issue #1820:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1820#issuecomment-2990142584
> [@andygrove](https://github.com/andygrove) can I backport
[SHA2-fix](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16350) to branch-48 of
datafusion ? I tried updating with d
2010YOUY01 merged PR #16462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16462
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dat
xudong963 commented on PR #16268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16268#issuecomment-2990161090
> 'here is the API changes that might break your system during upgrades',
and this PR is like a new feature you might want to try in the new release --
do we have a separate place
hendrikmakait commented on issue #16244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16244#issuecomment-2990158610
> Now for datafusion, maybe the best thing to do is simply
sum(get_record_batch_memory_size()), this should work for common cases, and
open an github issue to explain the
ctsk commented on PR #16463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16463#issuecomment-2990163724
I will do both of these things later today. I am concerned about the
performance impact for smaller-scale tasks. I suspect many users of datafusion
are not doing such large joins
2010YOUY01 commented on PR #16462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16462#issuecomment-2990191348
> Isn't this fixed by #16465?
Ah yes, and thank you for the pointer.
#16465 suppressed the specific failing test case, so now we should be able
to let the fuzzer run
pepijnve commented on PR #16455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16455#issuecomment-2990187740
@AdamGS would a PR that splits queries.sql into a file per query be
acceptable? There's precedent for that in some of the other benchmarks, and
that seems to be a reasonable comprom
git-hulk commented on PR #1897:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1897#issuecomment-2990949535
@iffyio Could you please take a look at this fix? The root cause is that it
might have more field definitions after the trailing bracket, but it is now
always regarded a
git-hulk opened a new pull request, #1897:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1897
Before applying this patch, the following SQL cannot be parsed:
```SQL
CREATE TABLE my_table (
f0 STRING,
f1 STRUCT>,
f2 STRING,
)
```
But it's a v
kosiew opened a new pull request, #1161:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1161
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #1158
## Rationale for this change
Currently, the documentation includes redundant entries for "DataFrame" and
"API", which cau
pepijnve commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2991004224
@alamb @Dandandan Another update. The realization that Tokio is not P/E-core
aware out of the box and that you have very little to no explicit control over
thread affinity on macOS
LiaCastaneda commented on code in PR #16454:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16454#discussion_r2158698230
##
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/builder.rs:
##
@@ -1667,6 +1667,34 @@ pub fn build_join_schema(
dfschema.with_functional_dependencies(func_dependenci
hendrikmakait commented on issue #16460:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16460#issuecomment-2991018757
That's what it looks like, I couldn't reproduce the problem with a directory
that only contains `.parquet` files.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #16244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16244#issuecomment-2990112035
> > A quick reminder for someone who is willing to implement it: It's
possible that multiple `Array`s share the same underlying buffer -- those
`Array`s can be within the sam
2010YOUY01 closed issue #16130: Support compression in spill files
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16130
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
2010YOUY01 merged PR #16268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16268
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dat
pepijnve commented on PR #16455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16455#issuecomment-2990302693
Ok, thanks for your opinion. Little developer quality of life improvements
like this are worth it imo. I'll make a PR that contains the necessary code
changes and a little bash scri
crepererum opened a new pull request, #16473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16473
## Which issue does this PR close?
\-
## Rationale for this change
The macro -- while being public and actually helpful -- is currently broken
& undocumented.
## What change
solontsev opened a new pull request, #1895:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1895
https://clickhouse.com/docs/operations/settings/settings#additional_table_filters
Current implementation only parses simple settings with key = value format
--
This is an au
solontsev closed pull request #1895: Clickhouse map settings support
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1895
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
zhangx opened a new issue, #1917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1917
### Describe the bug
I got this error when run`docker build -t apache/datafusion-comet -f
kube/Dockerfile .` to build a docker image.
```shell
#11 16.43Compiling untrusted v0.9.
pepijnve commented on PR #16455:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16455#issuecomment-2991261702
Take 2 in #16476
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
pepijnve commented on issue #16459:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16459#issuecomment-2991278170
Stepping through this with the debugger, it seems like a string view vector
containing a `null` array is treated as a vector of length `0` (or at least
`is_empty() == true`) wh
ozankabak commented on PR #16462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16462#issuecomment-2990175453
Isn't this fixed by #16465?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
2010YOUY01 opened a new pull request, #16470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16470
This reverts commit aa1e6dac7c5dfdfb2c0f52282638886bff194a5d.
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
See https://gith
xudong963 commented on issue #16188:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16188#issuecomment-2990200877
@kosiew 's suggestions look good to me, I have one another question:
**FilterPushdownPhase::Pre**
IMO, `FilterPushdownPhase::Pre` runs before most other physical
opti
crepererum opened a new pull request, #16471:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16471
## Which issue does this PR close?
\-
## Rationale for this change
Better DX.
## What changes are included in this PR?
Auto-derives.
## Are these changes tested?
geoffreyclaude opened a new pull request, #16469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16469
## Which issue does this PR close?
This PR addresses the extensibility limitation that causes recursive queries
to fail when used with the `datafusion-tracing` crate, as reported in
bert-beyondloops opened a new issue, #16474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16474
### Describe the bug
When using the array_has function with an empty list, the result is
Currently :
array_has([], 1) => **null**.
array_has(null, 1) => null.
timsaucer opened a new issue, #1162:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1162
**Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe
what you are trying to do.**
This is a follow on to https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1123
alamb commented on PR #75:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/75#issuecomment-2991145431
> One other thing I'm curious about. This write-up discusses the change in
terms of enabling long-running tasks to be cancelled, but would making
CPU-intensive exec blocks more cooperat
alamb commented on PR #75:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/75#issuecomment-2991169813
@pepijnve I pushed an Acknowedgement and "About DataFusion" sections
 under one
+// or more contributor license agree
pepijnve commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2991894796
@alamb thanks for taking the time to verify a bit further on your end. Just
FYI (and some shameless PR promotion), #16476 and #16477 will help a bit in
making investigation of indiv
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2991901283
@alamb I agree with merging this PR, the change should not affect the
performance since we already use MPSC for SPM, etc, thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the Apach
crepererum merged PR #16471:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16471
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dat
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1919:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1919#issuecomment-2991924758
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1919?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
alamb opened a new pull request, #16484:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16484
- draft as it builds on https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Follow on to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398 from
@pepijnve
alamb commented on code in PR #16395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16395#discussion_r2159067305
##
datafusion-examples/examples/embedding_parquet_indexes.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contrib
hendrikmakait opened a new pull request, #16481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16481
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #16244.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these chan
alamb commented on PR #16395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16395#issuecomment-2991749429
> The example print logs, it's good, thanks!
this is so cool!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
timsaucer commented on issue #1144:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1144#issuecomment-2991776198
Sorry it took so long to respond. I went to reproduce the error and took a
few minutes to dig into this. I found the bug and will be putting up a PR in
the upstream repo
timsaucer opened a new pull request, #16480:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16480
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1144
-
## Rationale for this change
There is a bug in how we compute the indice
andygrove commented on PR #16430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16430#issuecomment-2991855995
>
[apache/datafusion-comet#1913](https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1913)
@andygrove CI seems to have passed.🎉
Yes, I confirmed that the test passes now:
andygrove closed pull request #1913: [ignore] test DataFusion PR: Fix constant
window for evaluate stateful
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1913
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
adriangb closed issue #16438: 404 for indexed docs page
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16438
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #16395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16395#discussion_r2159136194
##
datafusion-examples/examples/embedding_parquet_indexes.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more c
alamb commented on issue #15771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15771#issuecomment-2991723331
> Do you think we need to do `48.0.1` to include fix for
[#16444](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16444)?
I think we can argue if that was a regression or not (i
hendrikmakait commented on issue #16244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16244#issuecomment-2991828951
It looks like there are other sets of metrics that would benefit from adding
`output_bytes` for improved data in `EXPLAIN ANALYZE`, namely `UnnestMetrics`,
`SortMergeJoinM
mbutrovich opened a new pull request, #1919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1919
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
fix compilation on main
## What changes are included in this PR?
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #16395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16395#discussion_r2159119104
##
datafusion-examples/examples/embedding_parquet_indexes.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more c
solontsev opened a new pull request, #1896:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1896
https://clickhouse.com/docs/operations/settings/settings#additional_table_filters
Current implementation only parses simple settings with key = value format
--
This is an au
alamb commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2991881151
Thank you also @zhuqi-lucas for all your help and attention to this PR
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
alamb commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2991878307
> Zooming in on query 4 (it would be super convenient if these had 1-based
indices BTW to match line numbers in the file).
Yes i also find the ClickHouse numbering schemes confu
iffyio commented on code in PR #1897:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1897#discussion_r2158909944
##
tests/sqlparser_bigquery.rs:
##
@@ -2472,3 +2472,52 @@ fn test_struct_field_options() {
")",
));
}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_struct_trailing
adriangb commented on issue #16188:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16188#issuecomment-2991542430
> Is there a duplication with push_down_filter in the logical optimizer?
I don't think so. The logical optimizer pushes things down into the table
scan phase, the physica
rutvik-max commented on issue #14515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14515#issuecomment-2991372461
Great to connect—excited to see what we can build together!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a
adriangb commented on code in PR #16371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16371#discussion_r2158922999
##
datafusion/core/src/datasource/listing/table.rs:
##
@@ -83,17 +85,16 @@ pub struct ListingTableConfig {
pub options: Option,
/// Tracks the source of
iffyio commented on PR #1893:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1893#issuecomment-2991529806
Thanks @eliaperantoni! Could you add some test cases to demonstrate the
behavior being fixed? (Also there's some CI failures on the branch that need
adressing it seems)
Dimchikkk opened a new pull request, #1899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1899
Fixes https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1898.
The bug was introduced in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1793 I think.
--
This i
Dimchikkk commented on PR #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16456#issuecomment-2991498323
(one of the test failures is related to
[#1898](https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1898) and
would be fixed if that patch is backported to 0.56)
--
This is
git-hulk commented on code in PR #1897:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1897#discussion_r2158957718
##
tests/sqlparser_bigquery.rs:
##
@@ -2472,3 +2472,52 @@ fn test_struct_field_options() {
")",
));
}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_struct_traili
adriangb merged PR #16475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16475
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
alamb merged PR #16470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16470
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #16470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16470#issuecomment-2991746450
Thank you everyone
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
mbutrovich merged PR #1892:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1892
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...
LiaCastaneda commented on code in PR #16454:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16454#discussion_r2158853002
##
datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs:
##
@@ -969,8 +972,24 @@ impl DefaultPhysicalPlanner {
// Remove temporary projected columns
adriangb commented on code in PR #16371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16371#discussion_r2158922999
##
datafusion/core/src/datasource/listing/table.rs:
##
@@ -83,17 +85,16 @@ pub struct ListingTableConfig {
pub options: Option,
/// Tracks the source of
alamb commented on issue #16438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16438#issuecomment-2991716663
I just tried accessing
- https://datafusion.apache.org/library-user-guide/adding-udfs.html
And it correctly goes to the new page now
- https://datafusion.apache.org/lib
suibianwanwank commented on PR #16430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16430#issuecomment-2991732448
> Thank you very much @suibianwanwank -- this looks great to me
>
> I took the liberty of merging up from main and adding a link to the github
issue in the test but I th
alamb commented on PR #16465:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16465#issuecomment-2991746831
Thanks @adriangb and @blaginin for sorting this out
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1918:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1918#issuecomment-2991761756
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1918?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
mbutrovich merged PR #1919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1919
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...
alamb commented on code in PR #16430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16430#discussion_r2158877685
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/window_optimize.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contri
adriangb commented on PR #16445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16445#issuecomment-2991563630
> It's hard to say generally, but a hashtable lookup which fits into cache
on a `u64` key can be really fast.
I guess only benchmarks can tell. But I still think the scalar bo
jonathanc-n opened a new pull request, #16488:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16488
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #13138 + #16385.
## Rationale for this change
We need to support Sort Merge Join, Symmetric Hash Join and swapping join
si
huaxingao opened a new pull request, #1920:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1920
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
Iceberg shades Parquet. We can't pass Parquet objects from Iceberg to Comet.
In order to ge
alamb opened a new issue, #16490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16490
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Modern Macs / Apple Silicon (and Intel 12th gen processors) make a
distinction between Performance (`P`) and Efficiency (`E`) cores.
adriangb commented on code in PR #16331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16331#discussion_r2159381725
##
datafusion-examples/examples/thread_pools.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,349 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor licen
Dandandan commented on PR #16483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16483#issuecomment-2992269293
I think this is probably faster! Do we have any benchmarks for this to show
it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
leung-ming commented on PR #1914:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1914#issuecomment-2992275004
> Would you like to add a unit test to cover this case?
Ok, do it later.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
alamb commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2992232572
🚀
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe
pepijnve commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2992237210
Oh my, it landed 🎉. Thanks @alamb, great start of my weekend!
Still working on the Tokio PR. I'll create a follow-up issue to referring to
the todo I left in the code.
--
T
pepijnve opened a new issue, #16489:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16489
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
PR #16398 revised the cooperative scheduling support in DataFusion to make
use of Tokio's task budget system. This was implemented
alamb commented on issue #16188:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16188#issuecomment-2992278637
> Is there a duplication with push_down_filter in the logical optimizer?
In my opinion there is duplication in the sense that they both do similar
things (push filters down
alamb commented on issue #12393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/12393#issuecomment-2992238567
I am still looking for a committer to help review the next round of this
example (which uses the object_store APIs)
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16331
--
This
alamb commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2992260580
> 🤔 now that I write '10-core MacBook', I'm wondering if the 10 core part is
where my variability is coming from. That's 6 performance and 4 efficiency
cores. Ideally DataFusion keeps
bert-beyondloops commented on issue #16459:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16459#issuecomment-2992321190
As I understood, this issue is triggered when the whole ListVector has no
item entries at all.
So every "row" has a null or empty list.(empty offsets buffer)
--
Th
parthchandra merged PR #1912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1912
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
alamb commented on issue #16490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16490#issuecomment-2992289216
A good quite quite https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=vk3m204o
> Statically pre-assigning pieces of a parallel workload to worker threads
will leave threads idle before th
timsaucer commented on PR #1161:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1161#issuecomment-2992538234
This is good, but I still see a couple of issues when I build it locally.
In the screen shot I am getting two different "API Reference" sections.
https://github.c
hendrikmakait commented on issue #16460:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16460#issuecomment-2992553343
As a side note, the docs at
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/a91e0421ebadf3a155508e28e272f5fb8356bca1/docs/source/user-guide/cli/datasources.md#parquet
don't matc
alamb commented on PR #16398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16398#issuecomment-2991892466
Actually, @zhuqi-lucas it wasn't 100% clear to me from your comments -- are
you ok with this PR being merged?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
drexler-sky commented on PR #1892:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1892#issuecomment-2992460842
Thanks @mbutrovich @andygrove @parthchandra
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
pepijnve opened a new pull request, #16476:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16476
## Which issue does this PR close?
None
## Rationale for this change
Clickbench query IDs are zero-based while most editors are one-based wrt
line numbers. This causes a litt
timsaucer commented on issue #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16486#issuecomment-2992456109
If we do a patch release I would like to get in this bugfix that I found
today: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16480
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
