Closed #1876.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1876#event-2028968945
Closing as the Gist is gone and at least some of the relevant things are fixed
by #1878
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1876#issuecomment-447663824
See #1878
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1876#issuecomment-397743092
Note, individual pull requests fixing an individual fault or a very small
number (after showing it really is a fault, not just "because the analyser says
so") are likely to be welcome. Omnibus pull requests are likely to take a long
time to be accepted due to the issues @b4n notes above.
--
Y
It's partly interesting, but as every static analyzer it's at least half wrong,
so it has to be used carefully, and it takes time. For example, the first
issue is both irrelevant and mostly wrong (it probably comes from the fact
`Assert` is defined conditionally as a non-aborting check, which m
