github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #8386:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8386#issuecomment-714988857
Revision: d26b20cb64debc6f022fdce1cde3ea3f812981ad
Submitted crossbow builds: [ursa-labs/crossbow @
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #8513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8513#issuecomment-715255711
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-10368
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
terencehonles commented on pull request #8386:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8386#issuecomment-714984695
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
rdettai opened a new pull request #8513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8513
Replace all specific XxxScan nodes with a generic SourceScan that
dynamically dispatches to any source implementation.
The main goal is to make implementations of custom data sources possible
raphaelauv opened a new issue #8514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/8514
Hello , the pypi version of pyarraw is 2.0.0 since Oct 19, 2020 ( previous
was 1.0.1 )
I could not find any release note explaining the changes and breaking
changes.
Do you know where I can
rdettai commented on pull request #8513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8513#issuecomment-715257359
@jorgecarleitao I have implemented the basic structure, with a
`SourceScanner` trait proposal. I have shown how the `SourceScan` logical plan
is mapped to an execution by just
jorgecarleitao closed pull request #8512:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8512
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
rdettai commented on pull request #8513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8513#issuecomment-715378341
I just found out something! It seems that datafusion is full of interesting
mysteries ! You actually already have the abstractions required to do what I
want, but they are a
terencehonles edited a comment on pull request #8386:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8386#issuecomment-715425280
> Revision:
[d26b20c](https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/d26b20cb64debc6f022fdce1cde3ea3f812981ad)
>
> Submitted crossbow builds: [ursa-labs/crossbow @
terencehonles commented on pull request #8386:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8386#issuecomment-715425280
> Revision:
[d26b20c](https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/d26b20cb64debc6f022fdce1cde3ea3f812981ad)
>
> Submitted crossbow builds: [ursa-labs/crossbow @
rok commented on a change in pull request #8510:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8510#discussion_r510879292
##
File path: python/pyarrow/tests/test_extension_type.py
##
@@ -76,6 +76,95 @@ def __reduce__(self):
return MyListType, (self.storage_type,)
+def
naman1996 commented on pull request #8497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8497#issuecomment-715391963
Sure closing this . The attempt was to fix the gandiva build issue. If that
is taken care of in that PR
This
naman1996 closed pull request #8497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8497
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
chrish42 commented on pull request #7110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7110#issuecomment-715368877
@emkornfield Ping, as requested. Thanks! It's really not a lot of code.
too. (Since Flatbuffers is doing the JSON <-> Flatbuffer part.)
wesm commented on issue #8514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/8514#issuecomment-715400893
Keep in mind that the major version bump does not indicate that there *are*
breaking API changes but that there *may be*
carols10cents commented on pull request #8402:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8402#issuecomment-715412380
> @carols10cents -- one idea I had which might be less efficient at runtime
but possibly be less complicated to implement, would be to use the arrow `cast`
kernels here:
alamb commented on pull request #8402:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8402#issuecomment-715419232
> Not really, because I am using the `cast` kernels in the `Converter`:
[`4b59fc9`
alamb commented on a change in pull request #8503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8503#discussion_r510851478
##
File path: rust/datafusion/src/physical_plan/merge.rs
##
@@ -103,37 +105,56 @@ impl ExecutionPlan for MergeExec {
alamb commented on pull request #8402:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8402#issuecomment-715396915
> @vertexclique @nevi-me I'm feeling stuck on converting primitive
dictionaries...
>
> I have [a solution that works for one key/value
wesm commented on issue #8514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/8514#issuecomment-715400236
We'll publish a blog post today probably about the release. You can look at
the changelog in the root of the git repository int he meantime.
wesm closed issue #8514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/8514
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
emkornfield commented on pull request #7110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7110#issuecomment-715450006
thanks for the reminder I should be able to look tonight/over the weekend.
This is an automated message from
nealrichardson commented on pull request #8371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8371#issuecomment-715463399
@xhochy what's the status of this? Can we get this merged soon?
This is an automated message from the
emkornfield opened a new pull request #8516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8516
The arrow code path doesn't call this method of not-null columns with no
null parents, so this wasn't caught in arrow tests.
The only time we can pass through counts is if definition level
nevi-me commented on a change in pull request #8401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8401#discussion_r511263089
##
File path: rust/arrow-c-integration/Cargo.toml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #8516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8516#issuecomment-715666118
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1935
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
carols10cents commented on pull request #8405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8405#issuecomment-715588688
@nevi-me So @shepmaster and I wrote some more tests, but they're failing and
we're not sure if our setup is wrong or if they're expected to fail? What do
you think?
carols10cents opened a new pull request #8515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8515
Hey @nevi-me, I was looking into helping out with the `def_levels` and
`rep_levels` handling in `get_levels` in arrow_writer.rs, and the logic is...
quite complex! I honestly have no idea how
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #8515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8515#issuecomment-715598067
Thanks for opening a pull request!
Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW
Then
jorgecarleitao opened a new pull request #8512:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8512
A simplification to the Arrow crate, since it is no longer needed, now that
we no longer have specialization.
This is an
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #8512:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8512#issuecomment-714935953
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-10375
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
31 matches
Mail list logo
