Re: [GHC] #2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry)

2008-04-18 Thread GHC
#2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry) ---+ Reporter: MagnusTherning | Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.8.3

Re: [GHC] #2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry)

2008-04-07 Thread GHC
#2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry) ---+ Reporter: MagnusTherning | Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.8.3

Re: [GHC] #2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry)

2008-04-06 Thread GHC
#2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry) ---+ Reporter: MagnusTherning | Owner: igloo Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.8.3

Re: [GHC] #2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry)

2008-04-06 Thread GHC
#2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry) ---+ Reporter: MagnusTherning | Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.8.3

Re: [GHC] #2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled

2008-03-19 Thread GHC
#2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled -+-- Reporter: trevorm |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: Component

Re: [GHC] #2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled

2008-03-19 Thread GHC
#2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled --+- Reporter: trevorm | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal| Milestone: Component

[GHC] #2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled

2008-03-14 Thread GHC
#2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled +--- Reporter: trevorm | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: Compiler

Re: [GHC] #2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled

2008-03-14 Thread GHC
#2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled -+-- Reporter: trevorm |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: Component

Re: [GHC] #2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled

2008-03-14 Thread GHC
#2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled -+-- Reporter: trevorm |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: Component

Re: [GHC] #2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled

2008-03-14 Thread GHC
#2156: compilation math/truncate bug with optimization enabled -+-- Reporter: trevorm |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: Component

[GHC] #2134: Intermittent file locking bug in installPackage.hs

2008-03-03 Thread GHC
#2134: Intermittent file locking bug in installPackage.hs +--- Reporter: gw | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: Compiler Version

Re: [GHC] #2080: Bug in CmmOpt

2008-02-17 Thread GHC
#2080: Bug in CmmOpt --+- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: closed Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.8.3 Component: Compiler |Version: 6.8.2

Re: [GHC] #1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug?

2008-02-16 Thread GHC
#1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug? ---+ Reporter: dons | Owner: Type: feature request| Status: reopened Priority: normal | Milestone

Re: [GHC] #2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry)

2008-02-15 Thread GHC
#2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry) ---+ Reporter: MagnusTherning | Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.8.3

Re: [GHC] #1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug?

2008-02-14 Thread GHC
#1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug? ---+ Reporter: dons | Owner: Type: feature request| Status: reopened Priority: normal | Milestone

Re: [GHC] #1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug?

2008-02-14 Thread GHC
#1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug? ---+ Reporter: dons | Owner: Type: bug| Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone

Re: [GHC] #1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug?

2008-02-14 Thread GHC
#1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug? ---+ Reporter: dons | Owner: Type: feature request| Status: reopened Priority: normal | Milestone

[GHC] #2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry)

2008-02-14 Thread GHC
#2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry) ---+ Reporter: MagnusTherning | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry)

2008-02-14 Thread GHC
#2097: bug in regEnumKeys (System.Win32.Registry) --+- Reporter: MagnusTherning |Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal |Milestone

Re: [GHC] #2080: Bug in CmmOpt

2008-02-08 Thread GHC
#2080: Bug in CmmOpt --+- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.8.3 Component: Compiler |Version: 6.8.2

[GHC] #2080: Bug in CmmOpt

2008-02-07 Thread GHC
#2080: Bug in CmmOpt -+-- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.8.3 Component: Compiler | Version: 6.8.2

Re: [GHC] #482: 'Bug' when installing GHC 6.4.1

2008-01-24 Thread GHC
#482: 'Bug' when installing GHC 6.4.1 --+- Reporter: nobody| Owner: wolfgang Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal| Milestone: _|_ Component: Build

Re: [GHC] #1959: Recompilation bug

2007-12-07 Thread GHC
#1959: Recompilation bug -+-- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high | Milestone: 6.10 branch Component: Compiler

Re: [GHC] #1959: Recompilation bug

2007-12-06 Thread GHC
#1959: Recompilation bug -+-- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high | Milestone: 6.8.2 Component: Compiler

Re: [GHC] #1959: Recompilation bug

2007-12-05 Thread GHC
#1959: Recompilation bug -+-- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.8 branch Component: Compiler

[GHC] #1959: Recompilation bug

2007-12-05 Thread GHC
#1959: Recompilation bug -+-- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.8 branch Component: Compiler | Version

Re: -O2 bug in GHC 6.8.1?

2007-11-20 Thread apfelmus
Christian Maeder wrote: good bug! -O or -O2 is irrelevant but it works if compiled with -fvia-C You (or someone else) should add it to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc I guess that this is related to http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/31675 Regards, apfelmus

Re: [GHC] #1123: Impredicativity bug: forall not hoisted properly

2007-11-12 Thread GHC
#1123: Impredicativity bug: forall not hoisted properly --+- Reporter: Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: simonpj Type: bug | Status: new

Re: [GHC] #1813: Strange type representation bug with phantom type synonyms in interactive mode

2007-11-10 Thread GHC
#1813: Strange type representation bug with phantom type synonyms in interactive mode ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: closed Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1813: Strange type representation bug with phantom type synonyms in interactive mode

2007-11-06 Thread GHC
#1813: Strange type representation bug with phantom type synonyms in interactive mode -+-- Reporter: guest| Owner: simonpj Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1612: GHC_PACKAGE_PATH and $topdir bug

2007-11-05 Thread GHC
#1612: GHC_PACKAGE_PATH and $topdir bug --+- Reporter: eivuokko | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.10 branch Component: Compiler

Re: [GHC] #1813: Strange type representation bug with phantom type synonyms in interactive mode

2007-11-05 Thread GHC
#1813: Strange type representation bug with phantom type synonyms in interactive mode -+-- Reporter: guest| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

[GHC] #1813: Strange type representation bug with phantom type synonyms in interactive mode

2007-10-29 Thread GHC
#1813: Strange type representation bug with phantom type synonyms in interactive mode --+- Reporter: guest| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1813: Strange type representation bug with phantom type synonyms in interactive mode

2007-10-29 Thread GHC
#1813: Strange type representation bug with phantom type synonyms in interactive mode +--- Reporter: guest|Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

-O bug?

2007-10-18 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
Dear GHC developers, The point (1) below looks like a bug (in all GHC versions!). (1) -O for demo-test. Take (the public) docon-2.10 build it under -O, install, and build also under -O its test program by cd demotest ghc $doconCpOpt -O --make Main Either the latter compilation

Re: bug 1711 revisited

2007-10-18 Thread Hal Perkins
Hi Ian - Here's what I've found: - libraries/haskell-src/Language/Haskell/Parser.hs still exists at the point the build stopped, with the original Oct.15 timestamp. - the suggested make.rebuild... command fails with the same problem. Console output: make rebuild.library.haskell-src rm

Re: bug in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-17 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:35:08PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: Serge I've just compiled docon-2.10 with the current 6.8 branch. It compiles fine. Log is below [..] Thank you. I looked into the log that you have enclosed. 1. Instance import. You see that GHC warns about a couple

Re: bug 1711 revisited

2007-10-17 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi Hal, On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:54:32PM -0700, Hal Perkins wrote: Sorry to revive a dead horse, but there's still a bit of a problem with building ghc on os x because of missing files that need to be created by happy. I downloaded the current stable sources yesterday

bug 1711 revisited

2007-10-16 Thread Hal Perkins
Sorry to revive a dead horse, but there's still a bit of a problem with building ghc on os x because of missing files that need to be created by happy. I downloaded the current stable sources yesterday (ghc-6.8.0.20071015-src.tar.bz2 and ghc-6.8.0.20071015-src- extralibs.tar.bz2) and tried

Re: bug in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-15 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:39:51PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: Serge Thank you so much for reporting your problems with DoCon 2.11. I believe I have fixed them. Would you like to try again? As of now, the fixes are in the HEAD, so you'll have to pull from there. In a day or two

Re: bug in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-15 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:47:37PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | But it'd be better still to check with the 6.8 branch, but I can see you can't do that. IAN, are we | dumping snapshots of the 6.8 branch for people to try? Can you help Serge (and perhaps others) have a | snapshot they

RE: bug in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-15 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
I'd go for 20070914 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.8.0.20070914-src.tar.bz2 S | -Original Message- | From: Serge D. Mechveliani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: 15 October 2007 15:41 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: bug

Re: bug in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-15 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
PROTECTED] | Sent: 15 October 2007 15:41 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: bug in 6.8.1-candidate | | On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:47:37PM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | | But it'd be better still to check with the 6.8 branch, but I can see you

Re: [GHC] #1746: GADT bug with -O2

2007-10-12 Thread GHC
#1746: GADT bug with -O2 -+-- Reporter: igloo |Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: closed Priority: normal|Milestone: 6.8.1 Component: Compiler | Version

Re: [GHC] #1755: Template Haskell quoting bug

2007-10-12 Thread GHC
#1755: Template Haskell quoting bug -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: closed Priority: low |Milestone

Re: [GHC] #1620: Bug in debugger 6.7.20070817

2007-10-10 Thread GHC
#1620: Bug in debugger 6.7.20070817 +--- Reporter: guest|Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal |Milestone: Component: GHCi | Version

Re: [GHC] #1746: GADT bug with -O2

2007-10-10 Thread GHC
#1746: GADT bug with -O2 -+-- Reporter: igloo |Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: 6.8.1 Component: Compiler | Version

Re: [GHC] #1755: Template Haskell quoting bug

2007-10-10 Thread GHC
#1755: Template Haskell quoting bug -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: igloo Type: merge | Status: new Priority: low |Milestone

[GHC] #1755: Template Haskell quoting bug

2007-10-04 Thread GHC
#1755: Template Haskell quoting bug ---+ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: low | Milestone

Re: [GHC] #1755: Template Haskell quoting bug

2007-10-04 Thread GHC
#1755: Template Haskell quoting bug -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: low |Milestone

bug in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-10-02 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
Dear GHC developers, this is again on the `panic' bug in ghc-6.8.1-candidate. The archive http://botik.ru/pub/local/Mechveliani/ghcBugs/bug2-6.8.0-sep28.zip presents one more report on this bug. Unzip and see install.txt. The project is built, but the test program Test.hs cannot build

bug in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-09-30 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
Dear GHC developers, I am preparing a bug report for the compiler of ghc-6.8.0.20070928-src: -- GBasFld_.hs:387:45: Warning: Defined but not used: `t' ghc-6.8.0.20070928: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) (GHC version 6.8.0.20070928 for i386-unknown-linux): initC

bug in 6.8.1-candidate

2007-09-30 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
Dear GHC developers, this is a bug report on ghc-6.8.1-candidate. The archive http://botik.ru/pub/local/Mechveliani/ghcBugs/bug-6.8.0-sep28.zip contains a project for which `making' under ghc-6.8.0.20070928-src produces a report of kind

Re: [GHC] #1746: GADT bug with -O2

2007-09-29 Thread GHC
#1746: GADT bug with -O2 -+-- Reporter: igloo |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: 6.8.1 Component: Compiler | Version

[GHC] #1746: GADT bug with -O2

2007-09-28 Thread GHC
#1746: GADT bug with -O2 ---+ Reporter: igloo | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.8.1 Component: Compiler |Version: 6.8

Re: Bug: wrong ghc location in package.conf

2007-09-12 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:52:18PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:17:32AM +0200, Sven Panne wrote: On Tuesday 11 September 2007 05:58, Conal Elliott wrote: In ghc-6.8 20070909, my package.conf contains some strange and incorrect paths, such as haddockInterfaces

Re: Bug: wrong ghc location in package.conf

2007-09-11 Thread Sven Panne
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 05:58, Conal Elliott wrote: In ghc-6.8 20070909, my package.conf contains some strange and incorrect paths, such as haddockInterfaces = [/usr/local/doc/ghc/libraries\\html\\containers\\containers.haddock], haddockHTMLs =

Re: Bug: wrong ghc location in package.conf

2007-09-11 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:17:32AM +0200, Sven Panne wrote: On Tuesday 11 September 2007 05:58, Conal Elliott wrote: In ghc-6.8 20070909, my package.conf contains some strange and incorrect paths, such as haddockInterfaces =

Re: Bug: wrong ghc location in package.conf

2007-09-11 Thread Conal Elliott
That's right, I'm using the windows binary installer from 0909. I haven't managed to build from HEAD sources lately, so I wasn't able to try the latest, as Sven suggested. - Conal On 9/11/07, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:17:32AM +0200, Sven Panne wrote: On

RE: bug in :browse (Re: ghci :browse! and type of class methods ([GHC] #1617))

2007-09-10 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Absolutely right! Thank you Claus, I will look into this. Simon | note that things are going wrong in this area even without my patch. | consider this module | -- | {-# OPTIONS_GHC -fglasgow-exts #-} | module Main where | class C a b where | c1 :: Num b = a - b | c2

curiosity, bug, or just dead code?

2007-09-10 Thread Claus Reinke
). but is it a bug? then again, everything is implicitly exported, and there are two possible 'T.length'.. (hugs [20051031] complains about conflicting exports, on loading T). now for the good part: module Q where import T main = print T.length loads fine, and running main returns 0. Ok

Re: curiosity, bug, or just dead code?

2007-09-10 Thread Tim Chevalier
' are ambiguous (ghci complains on uses of either name). but is it a bug? This seems like a GHC bug to me. The Haskell 98 report says: It is legal for more than one module in scope to use the same qualifier, provided that all names can still be resolved unambiguously. (section 5.3.3) and in this case

Re: curiosity, bug, or just dead code?

2007-09-10 Thread Ross Paterson
. This treatment of omitted export lists is a documented bug in Hugs (section 5.1.4 of the User's Guide). On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:15:20PM -0700, Tim Chevalier wrote: This seems like a GHC bug to me. The Haskell 98 report says: It is legal for more than one module in scope to use the same qualifier

Re: curiosity, bug, or just dead code?

2007-09-10 Thread Stefan O'Rear
' are ambiguous (ghci complains on uses of either name). but is it a bug? then again, everything is implicitly exported, and there are two possible 'T.length'.. (hugs [20051031] complains about conflicting exports, on loading T). now for the good part: module Q where import T

Bug: wrong ghc location in package.conf

2007-09-10 Thread Conal Elliott
-6.8.20070909/, not /usr/local. I do have a failed partial ghc build (from darcs HEAD) at /usr/local from last week. Perhaps there's some sticky info somewhere. I tried to submit a bug report through http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/newticket?type=bug, and I get back Permission Denied, although I am

bug in :browse (Re: ghci :browse! and type of class methods ([GHC] #1617))

2007-09-09 Thread Claus Reinke
more trouble with class method types: as a workaround for :browse!, i'm using GHC.exprType, even though that is a rather roundabout way of getting a type for a name. is there really no way of just printing the TyThing for a class method id correctly? note that things are going wrong in this

Re: [GHC] #1123: Impredicativity bug: forall not hoisted properly

2007-08-23 Thread GHC
#1123: Impredicativity bug: forall not hoisted properly -+-- Reporter: Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: simonpj Type: bug | Status: new Priority

Re: [GHC] #1330: Impredicativity bug: Church2 test gives a rather confusing error with the HEAD

2007-08-23 Thread GHC
#1330: Impredicativity bug: Church2 test gives a rather confusing error with the HEAD +--- Reporter: igloo|Owner: simonpj Type: bug | Status: new

Re: bug report: picoseconds handling in System.Time

2007-08-20 Thread Simon Marlow
Andrei Paskevich wrote: The diffClockTimes function can generate TimeDiff's with a negative value of tdPicosec. When you pass such a TimeDiff to addToClockTime, the latter may send negative picoseconds to toClockTime, provoking the error picoseconds out of range. While we are at it, please,

[GHC] #1620: Bug in debugger 6.7.20070817

2007-08-19 Thread GHC
#1620: Bug in debugger 6.7.20070817 --+- Reporter: guest| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: GHCi |Version

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-08-13 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: reopened Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-08-13 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: reopened Priority: normal

bug report: picoseconds handling in System.Time

2007-08-12 Thread Andrei Paskevich
The diffClockTimes function can generate TimeDiff's with a negative value of tdPicosec. When you pass such a TimeDiff to addToClockTime, the latter may send negative picoseconds to toClockTime, provoking the error picoseconds out of range. While we are at it, please, teach normalizeTimeDiff to

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-08-11 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: reopened Priority: high

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-08-11 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: reopened Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-08-01 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: reopened Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1330: Impredicativity bug: Church2 test gives a rather confusing error with the HEAD

2007-07-31 Thread GHC
#1330: Impredicativity bug: Church2 test gives a rather confusing error with the HEAD +--- Reporter: igloo|Owner: simonpj Type: bug | Status: new

Re: [GHC] #1560: Windows CreateProcess quotes bug; make re-executing itself fails

2007-07-30 Thread GHC
#1560: Windows CreateProcess quotes bug; make re-executing itself fails --+- Reporter: igloo |Owner: Type: bug| Status: closed Priority: high

[GHC] #1560: Windows CreateProcess quotes bug; make re-executing itself fails

2007-07-25 Thread GHC
#1560: Windows CreateProcess quotes bug; make re-executing itself fails +--- Reporter: igloo | Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: high

Re: [GHC] #1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug?

2007-07-23 Thread GHC
#1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug? --+- Reporter: dons |Owner: Type: bug| Status: closed Priority: normal |Milestone

Re: Bug involving graphics under OS X

2007-07-22 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:49 -0400, Scot Drysdale wrote: I am preparing to teach a course this fall from Paul Hudak's _The Haskell School of Expression_. In running Picture.lhs, one of the example programs form the book, I am getting strange graphics behavior. I load the program using

[GHC] #1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug?

2007-07-22 Thread GHC
#1555: Reverse do notation: lexer bug? +--- Reporter: dons | Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-07-04 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-07-04 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-07-04 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-07-04 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: closed Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-06-25 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1449: Bug in instance MonadFix []

2007-06-22 Thread GHC
#1449: Bug in instance MonadFix [] ---+ Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal

[GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-06-22 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type +--- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-06-22 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-06-22 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type

2007-06-22 Thread GHC
#1454: Confusing or bug: :t and :i don't return same type --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1449: Bug in instance MonadFix []

2007-06-21 Thread GHC
#1449: Bug in instance MonadFix [] ---+ Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #1449: Bug in instance MonadFix []

2007-06-21 Thread GHC
#1449: Bug in instance MonadFix [] ---+ Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal

Re: [GHC] #767: withMVar family have a bug

2007-05-18 Thread GHC
#767: withMVar family have a bug -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: high |Milestone: 6.8 Component: Compiler

Re: bug in GHC master Makefile

2007-05-13 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:26:50PM +, Simon Marlow wrote: Norman Ramsey wrote: 'make uninstall' silently does nothing: I'm not aware of 'make uninstall' ever working, in fact I don't think I've ever tried it. Probably we should just disable it, I'm not sure it's worth the trouble to

Re: [GHC] #1321: GHCi stdout bug when base package is not optimised

2007-05-10 Thread GHC
#1321: GHCi stdout bug when base package is not optimised -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal|Milestone: 6.8

[GHC] #1344: Overflow bug in hex character literals

2007-05-09 Thread GHC
#1344: Overflow bug in hex character literals --+- Reporter: simonmar | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: low | Milestone: _|_ Component

Re: [GHC] #831: GHCi user interface bug

2007-05-07 Thread GHC
#831: GHCi user interface bug +--- Reporter: guest|Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: low |Milestone: 6.8 Component: GHCi

Re: [GHC] #1321: GHCi stdout bug when base package is not optimised

2007-05-07 Thread GHC
#1321: GHCi stdout bug when base package is not optimised -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: 6.8

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >