ghc-2.07 on HPUX calamaties.

1997-10-01 Thread Alex Ferguson
Anyone got any bright ideas on this on? hsc seems to build OK on a HPUX box, but as soon as it tries to compile PrelBase: wilde.ucc.ie:~/ghc-2.07/fptools/ghc/lib: ../driver/ghc -H20M -cpp -fglasgow-exts -fvia-C -Rghc-timing -c ghc/PrelBase.lhs -dshow-passes -fmax-simplifier-iterations4 -funfo

Re: ghc-2.07 and ghc-0.29

1997-10-01 Thread Alex Ferguson
Juan Jose Quintela quotes me quoting Simon... > > > GHC 2.07 definitely does compile with 0.29, > > > including the happy-related bits. The happy sources in the tree will > > > compile with 0.29, and Happy can be told to generate 0.29-compatible > > > parsers by giving it the -1.2 flag (this fla

Re: ghc-2.07 and ghc-0.29

1997-10-01 Thread Juan Jose Quintela
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 1 Oct 1997, Alex Ferguson wrote: > > Simon M. sez: > > GHC 2.07 definitely does compile with 0.29, > > including the happy-related bits. The happy sources in the tree will > > compile with 0.29, and Happy can be told to generate 0.29-compatible > > pa

Re: ghc-2.07 and ghc-0.29

1997-10-01 Thread Alex Ferguson
Simon M. sez: > GHC 2.07 definitely does compile with 0.29, > including the happy-related bits. The happy sources in the tree will > compile with 0.29, and Happy can be told to generate 0.29-compatible > parsers by giving it the -1.2 flag (this flag is used automatically by > ghc/compiler/Makefi

Re: ghc-2.07 and ghc-0.29

1997-10-01 Thread Simon Marlow
Juan Jose Quintela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Alex Ferguson wrote: > > > > (t)rusty ole 0.29? At any rate, it seems to choke on the happy-1.3 > > generated Parser.hs. > > There is one problem with the newtype declarations, that happy uses > and ghc-0.29 doesn't under

Pat on the back

1997-10-01 Thread David Barton
This isn't a bug; quite the opposite. But I've been so common here in my comments and reports that I really must report success. With the last release, GHC 2.07 fully self-compiles on a Linux box. I first compiled it with 0.29 (as I have had to before), and then compiled itself. Where it alway

printing the ghc source?

1997-10-01 Thread Carl R. Witty
I'm interested in learning how GHC works. To this end, I'd like to print out large chunks of its source and pore over them. I would have hoped that the fact that GHC is written in the "literate programming" style would make it easy to get high-quality printouts; however, it doesn't seem to work.