RE: strange selectee 11

2000-02-14 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
This is a Bad Situation. It looks like a bug in the garbage collector, which are very hard to reproduce. It will probably go away if you change *anything* (heap size etc). Do pls try it with 4.06. If it happens there then we'd better get the source and see if we can reproduce it. Simon |

RE: strange selectee 11

2000-02-14 Thread Julian Seward (Intl Vendor)
Would upgrading to 4.06 be likely to help here? Maybe. Try. If your program relies on concurrency or non-blocking IO, it might help. J

RE: strange selectee 11

2000-02-14 Thread Julian Seward (Intl Vendor)
Thinking about this more, the error msg has a familiar sound to it. Did you use 4.04 patchlevel 0 or 1 ? pl 0 has some rts-ish probs which were fixed in pl1 (and of course in 4.06). J Would upgrading to 4.06 be likely to help here?

Re: strange selectee 11

2000-02-14 Thread Josef Sveningsson
Hi guys! On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Alastair Reid wrote: Thinking about this more, the error msg has a familiar sound to it. Did you use 4.04 patchlevel 0 or 1 ? pl 0 has some rts-ish probs which were fixed in pl1 (and of course in 4.06). The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System,

Re: strange selectee 11

2000-02-14 Thread Alastair Reid
Thinking about this more, the error msg has a familiar sound to it. Did you use 4.04 patchlevel 0 or 1 ? pl 0 has some rts-ish probs which were fixed in pl1 (and of course in 4.06). The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 4.04, patchlevel 1 My program is just a plain old

Re: strange selectee 11

2000-02-14 Thread Josef Sveningsson
Sorry for replying on my own posting but... On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Josef Sveningsson wrote: I also managed to get the 'strange selectee' error but with number 27 instead while compiling. The thing is that I'm running ghc 4.06 . The file I compiled was a Lex generated file. OK, now you all