Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:46:30AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
I couldn't reproduce this with a simple program that forked off 4
threads to do computation on a single CPU machine, and neither could
someone on IRC with head from Sep 15 on a Core Duo.
Is it possible to send
#16: Extensionsflags
--+-
Reporter: axelkr | Owner: igloo
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler
#905: the `impossible' happened: ASSERT failed! file codeGen/ClosureInfo.lhs,
line 596
--+-
Reporter: Misha Aizatulin [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner:
Type: bug |
Brian Smith wrote:
On 9/26/06, *Simon Marlow* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Smith wrote:
The test always failed. When I decreased the number of threads in the
test from 5,000 to 1,400 or so, then the tests passed sometimes, and
sometimes
#910: --make should have a -j flag for parallel building
--+-
Reporter: igloo| Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
#880: someFunction :: TypeRep - Int
--+-
Reporter: guest| Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component:
#880: someFunction :: TypeRep - Int
--+-
Reporter: guest| Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component:
#911: Better information about the location of exceptions
+---
Reporter: simonmar |Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal |Milestone:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:25:39AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Perhaps clock_gettime() is returning strange results on your system. Could
you try compiling with -threaded -debug, and run the program under gdb.
When I compile with -threaded -debug, the stats are OK :-/
Best regards
Tomasz
Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:25:39AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Perhaps clock_gettime() is returning strange results on your system. Could
you try compiling with -threaded -debug, and run the program under gdb.
When I compile with -threaded -debug, the stats are OK
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:06:34PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
When I compile with -threaded -debug, the stats are OK :-/
Ok, maybe try strace?
Nothing suspicious, at least for me. Strace logs attached.
I'll try to compile GHC from sources and put some debugging
prints in the RTS. There
#887: GHCi prints results of IO actions
--+-
Reporter: guest| Owner:
Type: bug | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: GHCi |
#806: hGetBufNonBlocking doesn't work with -threaded on Windows
-+--
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal |
#912: Build system is missing various dependencies
-+--
Reporter: simonmar |Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal|Milestone:
#710: library reorganisation
-+--
Reporter: simonmar| Owner:
Type: task| Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.8
Component:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:03:53PM +0200, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
Hello!
I am getting nonsensical execution statistics (+RTS -Sstderr) when
running programs in SMP mode (+RTS -N2).
I've found a machine which had the same problem. I think I've fixed it with
Thu Sep 28 00:46:30 BST 2006 Ian
#867: Integer arithmetic gives the wrong answer on amd64/Linux
---+
Reporter: igloo | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: closed
Priority: normal| Milestone:
On 9/26/06, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Brian Smith wrote: Now, when I tried to rerun the tests against the latest ghc-6.6, ghc.exe is segfaulting on ffi012(ghci), conc049(ghci), and conc023(ghci): Unhandled exception at 0x0207fc58 in
ghc.exe: 0xC005: Access violation.That's a bit
18 matches
Mail list logo
