Perhaps someone who knows SELinux would like to describe how to
set up
an exception for GHC so we can put it in the FAQ?
I have added:
/usr/bin/chcon -t unconfined_execmem_exec_t /path/to/binary/prog
to the %post install scripts of the darcs and haddock packages in
Fedora Extras for now,
Jon Fairbairn wrote:
Fixed in the HEAD and the 6.4 branch, but I haven't been able to test
(don't have SE Linux on a local machine). Please download a snapshot and
try it out, if possible.
That does seem to mend it for me. Note that my report says
it only seems to happen x86_64 while in
Simon Marlow wrote:
My fix works around allow_execheap being set to 0, but not
allow_execmem. This page describes how to work around allow_execmem:
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/selinux-mem.html
Okay, thanks.
But I really object to having to go to such lengths just to work around
an
Johan van der Teems wrote:
Linux ollie 2.6.10-5-amd64-k8 #1 Fri Jun 24 17:08:40 UTC 2005 x86_64 GNU/Linux
c2hsLocal: internal error: scavenge_mark_stack: unimplemented/strange closure
type -1780771344 @ 0x2a95db9058
Please report this as a bug to glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org,
or
Hi,
I built and installed wxhaskell-0.9 with ghc-6.2.2 on x86_64.
When I link a sample program and try to run it however,
I get:
wxhaskell-0.9/samples/wx% ./a.out
a.out: internal error: adjustor creation not supported on this platform
Please report this as a bug to
20030603()0459 Alastair Reid :
On Monday 02 June 2003 7:20 pm, Alastair Reid wrote:
In preparation for a major release of Green Card, we are making an alpha
release for GHC folk to play with.
Thanks! I made an rpm package of it with ghc-6.0 built for Red Hat Linux
9:
20030604()1733 Jens Petersen :
Thanks! I made an rpm package of it with ghc-6.0 built for Red Hat Linux
9:
http://haskell.org/~petersen/rpms/greencard/greencard-3.00-1.src.rpm
http://haskell.org/~petersen/rpms/greencard/greencard-ghc6.0-3.00-1.rhl9.i386.rpm
Sorry, I renamed the packages
Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be good if ghc would at like give a better error
message when an empty cmd is passed to -pgmX.
Rather I think it should abort rather than forking an empty
command...
How about something like
Not sure whether this is a documentation bug or not, but I
got tripped over by the syntax of the -pgm options this
week.
In the user-guide
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/set/flag-reference.html#AEN5804
there clearly seem to be spaces between -pgmX and cmd,
however looking at the code in
Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be good if ghc would at like give a better error
message when an empty cmd is passed to -pgmX.
Rather I think it should abort rather than forking an empty
command...
Jens
___
Glasgow-haskell-bugs
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
/tmp/ghc19742.hc:4928: Unable to find a register to spill in
class `SIREG'.
/tmp/ghc19742.hc:4928: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
make: *** [examples/Libgr.o] error 1
This is an error from the C compiler telling you it ran out of registers
I don't think this is new, but I feel it is a ghc bug.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I do:
% cat manyfiles.hs
main :: IO ()
main =
do
readFile manyfiles.hs
main
% ghc -o manyfiles manyfiles.hs
% ./manyfiles
Fail: resource exhausted
Action: openFile
Reason: process file table
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
05 Oct 2001 17:51:45 +0900, Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
IMHO hugs is doing the right thing here. Shouldn't ghc also
close semiclosed handles when all references to them have
been dropped?
I guess it would close, but garbage
13 matches
Mail list logo
