Re: posting

2004-12-15 Thread Ketil Malde
Kenny Chamber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How long after posting should it take for a message to appear on the > list? It should be pretty fast, but some lists moderate posts by non-subscribers. Could this be your problem? For timing, we could look at your headers: Date: Thu, 16 Dec

posting

2004-12-15 Thread Kenny Chamber
How long after posting should it take for a message to appear on the list? --- Kenny Chamber http://gem-hs.org/contact.html ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskel

RE: debian ghci on sparc64

2004-12-15 Thread Simon Marlow
On 15 December 2004 14:46, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > There seems to be some trouble with the debian ghci on sparc64. I can > dredge up more information if given an idea of what to look for. > > $ ghci >___ ___ _ > / _ \ /\ /\/ __(_) > / /_\// /_/ / / | | GHC Interactive

RE: Stack overflow machine dependent?

2004-12-15 Thread Simon Marlow
On 14 December 2004 12:42, Arjen van Weelden wrote: > Simon Marlow wrote: > >> On 14 December 2004 10:46, Arjen van Weelden wrote: >> >> Is the program completely self-contained and deterministic? i.e. >> does it read any files in the filesystem, check the time, or do >> anything that might give

debian ghci on sparc64

2004-12-15 Thread William Lee Irwin III
There seems to be some trouble with the debian ghci on sparc64. I can dredge up more information if given an idea of what to look for. $ ghci ___ ___ _ / _ \ /\ /\/ __(_) / /_\// /_/ / / | | GHC Interactive, version 6.2.2, for Haskell 98. / /_\\/ __ / /___| | http://www

RE: -ddump-parsed and infix operators

2004-12-15 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
You're right: they are passed left-associatively, and fixed up later. That way the parser does not need to know about associativity and precedence. So it's not a bug. Just something you need to know about -ddump-parsed! Simon | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:glasgo