Kenny Chamber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How long after posting should it take for a message to appear on the
> list?
It should be pretty fast, but some lists moderate posts by
non-subscribers. Could this be your problem?
For timing, we could look at your headers:
Date: Thu, 16 Dec
How long after posting should it take for a message to appear on the
list?
---
Kenny Chamber
http://gem-hs.org/contact.html
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskel
On 15 December 2004 14:46, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> There seems to be some trouble with the debian ghci on sparc64. I can
> dredge up more information if given an idea of what to look for.
>
> $ ghci
>___ ___ _
> / _ \ /\ /\/ __(_)
> / /_\// /_/ / / | | GHC Interactive
On 14 December 2004 12:42, Arjen van Weelden wrote:
> Simon Marlow wrote:
>
>> On 14 December 2004 10:46, Arjen van Weelden wrote:
>>
>> Is the program completely self-contained and deterministic? i.e.
>> does it read any files in the filesystem, check the time, or do
>> anything that might give
There seems to be some trouble with the debian ghci on sparc64. I can
dredge up more information if given an idea of what to look for.
$ ghci
___ ___ _
/ _ \ /\ /\/ __(_)
/ /_\// /_/ / / | | GHC Interactive, version 6.2.2, for Haskell 98.
/ /_\\/ __ / /___| | http://www
You're right: they are passed left-associatively, and fixed up later.
That way the parser does not need to know about associativity and
precedence.
So it's not a bug. Just something you need to know about -ddump-parsed!
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:glasgo