Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-28 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Albert, Sunday, April 29, 2007, 2:51:24 AM, you wrote: >> Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a >> C++ compiler? > .NET literates, will benefit from the many libraries available in .NET. > Can we also include a .NET runtime, a .NET documentation suite, all

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-28 Thread Albert Y. C. Lai
Duncan Coutts wrote: Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a C++ compiler? I'm afraid it's just you. Like that someone who has indicated interest in haskell-c++ integration, I am interested in the prospect of mixing haskell with .NET languages, and not to menti

Re: Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-28 Thread Neil Mitchell
Hi > Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a alternative way may be inclusion of instructions how to add c++ compiler to ghc installation - it's not trivial because one need to know which gcc version should be used and which files copied Since I know that Bulat

Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-28 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Duncan, Saturday, April 28, 2007, 9:58:18 PM, you wrote: >> can you please include in win32 distro c++ compiler, as it was done >> before and as it requested by trac ticket >> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1024 ? > Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-28 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 17:07 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > Hello Ian, > > Thursday, April 26, 2007, 3:22:23 PM, you wrote: > > The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.6.1 > > can you please include in win32 distro c++ compiler, as it was done > before and as it requested by t