Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

Hello Albert, Sunday, April 29, 2007, 2:51:24 AM, you wrote: Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a C++ compiler? .NET literates, will benefit from the many libraries available in .NET. Can we also include a .NET runtime, a .NET documentation suite, all .NET

Error compiling GHC/Num.lhs

Hello, I'm trying to build GHC from darcs. Unfortunately compilation fails with the following error: ... cpphs: #error Please define LEFTMOST_BIT to be 2^(SIZEOF_HSWORD*8-1) in GHC/Num.lhs at line 27 col 1 make[1]: *** [doc.library.base] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory

non-owner-writable files generated in ghc build process?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When I was doing `rm -r` on a build tree it pointed out that driver/split/ghc-split.prl and driver/mangler/ghc-asm.prl were write-protected. Tacking this down, they're generated from .lprl with unlit... then (in mk/suffix.mk) they are `chmod 444`-ed.

Re: Error compiling GHC/Num.lhs

Hi Bas, On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:54:35AM +, Bas van Dijk wrote: I'm trying to build GHC from darcs. Unfortunately compilation fails with the following error: ... cpphs: #error Please define LEFTMOST_BIT to be 2^(SIZEOF_HSWORD*8-1) in GHC/Num.lhs at line 27 col 1 make[1]: ***

Re: non-owner-writable files generated in ghc build process?

On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:12:00AM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote: When I was doing `rm -r` on a build tree it pointed out that driver/split/ghc-split.prl and driver/mangler/ghc-asm.prl were write-protected. Tacking this down, they're generated from .lprl with unlit... then (in mk/suffix.mk)

Re: GHC on ia64

Hi Cristian, On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 07:00:51PM +0200, Cristian Perfumo wrote: We've been trying to compile GHC 6.6 on ia64, and although we have applied the patch on http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1150 , we still get some mangler errors with nop 0s. As well as the patch

Re: non-owner-writable files generated in ghc build process?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan O'Rear wrote: On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:12:00AM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote: When I was doing `rm -r` on a build tree it pointed out that driver/split/ghc-split.prl and driver/mangler/ghc-asm.prl were write-protected. Tacking this down,

Re: Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 10:38 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello Albert, Sunday, April 29, 2007, 2:51:24 AM, you wrote: Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a C++ compiler? .NET literates, will benefit from the many libraries available in .NET. Can