I can't seem to get the latest source bundle to build (running on Red Hat).
I run the configure script, then make on the source tree root, and ghc gives
an error to the effect of 'could not load shared object file or library
libedit.so.0'. I don't have root permissions on this machine so I can't
i
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Ki,
Tuesday, November 11, 2008, 4:04:11 AM, you wrote:
i have also linux getCh if you need it, although afaik it's not
perfect and actually you should use something inside Unix package
On Unix it is not a problem. We can just use the hSetBuffering and
hSetEcho f
Hi,
It is a few days after the release. But why the darcs repos of 6.10
is still changing?
Ian Lynagh wrote:
==
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.1
2008/11/12 Andrea Vezzosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I get the same behaviour, and when I open ghci in xterm and press Ctrl-D it
> also echoes ^D before quitting, which is similar to the problem with
> haskell-mode which seems to don't like the echoing of ^J from ghci when one
> uses commands like C-u
How was the Linux binary for GHC created? I am looking at ways
to compile Haskell binaries for Linux that work across
distros. So far, I have been using `-static -optl-static` but
today there was a weird hiccup with IO -- the Gentoo built
binary worked fine on Gentoo but caught SIGPIPE in
I get the same behaviour, and when I open ghci in xterm and press Ctrl-D it
also echoes ^D before quitting, which is similar to the problem with
haskell-mode which seems to don't like the echoing of ^J from ghci when one
uses commands like C-u C-c C-t (which should copy the inferred type from the
g
ghci echoes all of my input in emacs, when run via haskell-mode or via "M-x
shell", which then confuses various useful haskell-mode features. I built
it from sources. At the time I didn't have libedit-dev, so today I
installed libedit-dev (version 2.11~20080614 on ubuntu), did a clean make &
inst
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 06:38:02PM +0100, dermiste wrote:
> I've successfully built GHC-6.10.1 from 6.6.1 on OpenBSD 4.4, and
> would like now to generate a hc-file-bundle to build it without
> pre-existing GHC. I followed the instructions in [1], but I'm stuck
> with this error :
> Linking dist-in
Hi,
I've successfully built GHC-6.10.1 from 6.6.1 on OpenBSD 4.4, and
would like now to generate a hc-file-bundle to build it without
pre-existing GHC. I followed the instructions in [1], but I'm stuck
with this error :
[]
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/lang/ghc/w-ghc-6.10.1-ghc_boot
Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
> Christian Maeder wrote:
>> I can offer a Tiger PPC built that works for me:
>> (linked against /opt/local/lib/libgmp.dylib)
>>
>
> But the filename says "-i386-" so I suspect it is not a powerpc build.
Sorry, the link is:
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/mac/ghcs/ghc-6.10.1-p
Christian Maeder wrote:
I can offer a Tiger PPC built that works for me:
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/intel-mac/ghcs/ghc-6.10.1-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
(linked against /opt/local/lib/libgmp.dylib)
Cheers Christian
But the filename says "-i386-" so I suspect it is not a powerpc build.
Regard
I can offer a Tiger PPC built that works for me:
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/intel-mac/ghcs/ghc-6.10.1-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
(linked against /opt/local/lib/libgmp.dylib)
Cheers Christian
Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
> I am having trouble compiling GHC using mac ports on powerpc OS X
> (10.5.5) (usi
Jeff Polakow wrote:
However, I don't see
how they are not equivalent (in the presence of impredicative
polymorphism) since I can write
derivations for both
forall b. (b -> String /\ Int) |- (forall b. b -> String) /\ Int
and
(forall b. b -> String) /\ Int |- forall b. (b -> Strin
I am having trouble compiling GHC using mac ports on powerpc OS X (10.5.5)
(using XCode 3.1).
I have also opened a ticket at http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17184 which has
the full build log attached.
The build starts with
nice port -c upgrade ghc
---> Staging gmp into destroot
---> Pack
Jeff Polakow wrote:
Hello,
I filed the following bug report:
This produces a type error:
foo :: forall b. (b -> String, Int)
foo = (const "hi", 0)
bar :: (forall b. b -> String, Int)
bar = foo
But the types are equivalent.
Once you cross the forall
Hello Ki,
Tuesday, November 11, 2008, 4:04:11 AM, you wrote:
i have also linux getCh if you need it, although afaik it's not
perfect and actually you should use something inside Unix package
--
Best regards,
Bulatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
16 matches
Mail list logo