On 11/11/2010 22:41, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu
mailto:ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
I was under the impression we fixed this:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/850
That is, we should be using SIGVTALRM, not SIGALRM,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anything that we could do in GHC to improve the situation? I
suppose we could have a dedicated OS thread who's job it was to sit around
and run the signal handler every Nth of a second.
Maybe that would work,
Quoth Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com,
...
Is there anything that we could do in GHC to improve the situation? I
suppose we could have a dedicated OS thread who's job it was to sit
around and run the signal handler every Nth of a second.
Since the -threaded RTS automatically spawns a couple
