Hi All,
I am still having difficulty getting a plain GHC build with INTEGER_LIBRARY
= integer-simple. (I outlined my problem here yesterday
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2011-July/020631.htm
l .)
I suspected my failure to get a vanilla build (with GMP) was a minor
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.2.1:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.2.1-rc1/
This includes the source and testsuite tarballs, installers for OS X and
Windows, and bindists for amd64/Linux, i386/Linux, amd64/FreeBSD and
i386/FreeBSD.
Please test as much
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 05:51:23PM +0100, Chris Dornan wrote:
But when I repeat with INTEGER_LIBRARY = integer-simple (on quick test)
GHCi, version 6.12.3: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Note that 6.12.3 is quite old now, and neither that branch or the 7.0
branch are still being
On Friday 29 July 2011, 18:51:23, Chris Dornan wrote:
Hi All,
I am still having difficulty getting a plain GHC build with
INTEGER_LIBRARY = integer-simple. (I outlined my problem here yesterday
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2011-July/020631
.htm l .)
RHEL 5
Thanks Daniel.
I have just now built the 7.2.1 RC1 with integer-simple on CentOS 6 with the
same failure.
It doesn't surprise me -- there is clearly something in my setup that is
causing this problem.
But it's good to get it confirmed -- thanks!
Chris
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Marianna,
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 12:11:57PM +0200, Marianna Rapoport wrote:
Thus, test_ghc.sh and test_my.sh should do the same, but the first works
correctly while the latter puts use.o and use.hi to the src folder.
I'm no expert on the GHC API, but replacing doWalk with this seems to
Thanks Ian,
It's much appreciated. As I said to Daniel, I have just tried building 7.2.1
RC1 with the same failure.
Yes, by quick-test I mean the build flavour. (Basically I am explaining
exactly how I am configuring the default build, which does work for me.)
My point was that I had worked my