Looks great; I care and have no improvements to offer; +1 from me.
Chris
From: Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.com
Date: Monday, 14 January 2013 18:09
To: glasgow-haskell-users glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: Newtype wrappers
Friends
I¹d like to propose a way to ³promote²
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 7.6.1
=
GHC 7.6.1 is available now on all platforms (el5, el6, fc16, fc17) at
http://justhub.org/download.
Sorry I am a bit late to this: it appears to work fine on all my platforms:
el5, el6, fc16, fc17 (justhub.org/catalogue).
I haven't tested it thoroughly yet.
Chris
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
it is popular with build-bot admins) it has also been recently extended
and revised the software remains in beta testing for now.
For news, documentation, articles, download and installation instructions,
links to the repositories and trackers etc., see http://justhub.org.
Chris Dornan
ghc-pkg is warning about dangling references to missing documentation. Some
of the packages on my (JustHub) distro do this: the Haskell Platform dummy
package (as you report), and GLUT rather than zlib . AFAIK it is generally
harmless (apart from the confusion).
I would like to get rid of them
I have built 7.4.2-rc1 on CentOS5, CentOS6 and Fedora Core 16 without a
hitch.
I am testing it with the provisional 2021.2.0.0 platform (currently slated
to use 7.4.1).
CentOS packages for 7.4.2-rc1 and its companion 2012.2.0.0-beta2 are up at
justhub.org; the FC16 packages and some
For those of us unfamiliar with Agda would somebody explain what you mean by
showing ‘anything introduced in local scopes around the hole’?
If the hole were at the top level then this would be the module context and
loading it into ghci would give you what you need? (Or more realistically you
That’s as maybe but last time I looked (I don’t have it to hand) the OED
generally accepts –ize or –ise spellings for British English (maybe even
favouring the former).
Chris
From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
Y'all have probably seen this, but I have opened #5607 saying a bit more.
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5607
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Simon Marlow [mailto:marlo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 November 2011 16:45
To: Chris Dornan
Cc: 'Ian Lynagh'; glasgow-haskell
It's looking good but base is still untrusted out of the box. Is this right?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Ian Lynagh
Sent: 06 November 2011 13:19
To:
`base_ControlziExceptionziBase_patError_info'
*** Deleting temp files:
Deleting:
*** Deleting temp dirs:
Deleting:
ghc-stage2: unable to load package `integer-simple'
Chris
From: Chris Dornan [mailto:ch...@chrisdornan.com]
Sent: 30 July 2011 22:37
To: 'glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org'
Subject: RE: integer
-config --libs`
# NoFib settings
NoFibWays =
STRIP=:
INTEGER_LIBRARY = integer-simple
end-snipety-snip
From: Chris Dornan [mailto:ch...@chrisdornan.com]
Sent: 30 July 2011 21:35
To: 'glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org'
Subject
Hi All,
I am still having difficulty getting a plain GHC build with INTEGER_LIBRARY
= integer-simple. (I outlined my problem here yesterday
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2011-July/020631.htm
l .)
I suspected my failure to get a vanilla build (with GMP) was a minor
: Daniel Fischer [mailto:daniel.is.fisc...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 29 July 2011 22:02
To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Cc: Chris Dornan
Subject: Re: integer-simple
On Friday 29 July 2011, 18:51:23, Chris Dornan wrote:
Hi All,
I am still having difficulty getting a plain GHC build
will be happy to try them out.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lynagh [mailto:ig...@earth.li]
Sent: 29 July 2011 21:42
To: Chris Dornan
Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: Re: integer-simple
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 05:51:23PM +0100, Chris Dornan wrote:
But when I
Hi All,
I have been trying to get a simple-integer build for GHC without success. It
always ends with the build going through fine, but when I try to run ghci I
get:
GHCi, version 6.12.3: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done.
ghc:
As everyone has been saying, the primary issue is the workflow of the main
contributors and the cost of the transition.
However, I made the transition to Git and GitHub earlier this year and that
initial investment has been repaid handsomely (it’s the first system I have
felt truly
17 matches
Mail list logo
