On 28 September 2004 16:06, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
On the theme of improving Haddock, do you think it could be fixed to
generate valid HTML? Here are some examples of the errors I get when
running Haddock output through validate (the Web Design Group's
HTML and XML validator).
Oops! I did
On 30 September 2004 10:08, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 28 September 2004 16:06, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
On the theme of improving Haddock, do you think it could be fixed to
generate valid HTML? Here are some examples of the errors I get when
running Haddock output through validate (the Web
While I am at it: There is another (rather simple) feature
I'd like to see in Haddock. I often link to
Haddock-generated documentation on my web pages, but there
is no way for me to link _back_ from the Haddock output.
Would it be possible to add command line switch to specify
an up link and the
On the theme of improving Haddock, do you think it could be fixed to
generate valid HTML? Here are some examples of the errors I get when
running Haddock output through validate (the Web Design Group's
HTML and XML validator).
*** Errors validating Text.XML.HaXml.Combinators.html: ***
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 04:05:59PM +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
On the theme of improving Haddock, do you think it could be fixed to
generate valid HTML?
Maybe it would be a good idea to use Peter Thiemann's WASH/HTML
library? Dependence on external library is one obvious (small?) problem
that
Simon Marlow writes:
The tree is expanded by default now (Sven Panne made the
change a few days ago).
I have rebuilt everything from CVS HEAD moments ago and the
generated reference documentation still comes with the menus
collapsed. Am I doing something wrong?
Peter
Simon Marlow writes:
This change has now been made.
Uh ... any hints what has changed? A new command line flag?
we need a way to retain the collapsed/expanded state
between page transitions (JavaScript hackers apply
here!).
I am not certain whether these collapsed menus are a good
