Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> I'm slightly disturbed that there hasn't been much noise on this list
> concerning ghc and Linux/glibc versioning problems. We've had no end of
> trouble here with incompatibilites between glibc 2.0 and 2.1 - although
> programs built on the former appea
On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 04:29:51 -0700, Simon Marlow wrote:
> We at GHC HQ have just upgraded our remaining glibc 2.0 machine here to
> glibc 2.1, so at least we'll have fewer compatibility problems. But that
> means we won't be able to build glibc 2.0 binaries from now on: is this
> going to cau
GHC folks,
I'm slightly disturbed that there hasn't been much noise on this list
concerning ghc and Linux/glibc versioning problems. We've had no end of
trouble here with incompatibilites between glibc 2.0 and 2.1 - although
programs built on the former appear to be forward-compatible, strange
p
