Claus Reinke wrote:
Thank you all. Everything is great now. It was because (Just ghcPath) was
not passed into runGhc, and lack of ghc-path.
btw: is ghc-path going to be part of the ghc release or the haskell
platform? Currently, I can't see it in either, which
would be a pity. I thought
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 04:20:59PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Claus Reinke wrote:
Thank you all. Everything is great now. It was because (Just ghcPath) was
not passed into runGhc, and lack of ghc-path.
btw: is ghc-path going to be part of the ghc release or the haskell
platform? Currently
Thank you all. Everything is great now. It was because (Just ghcPath) was
not passed into runGhc, and lack of ghc-path.
btw: is ghc-path going to be part of the ghc release or the
haskell platform? Currently, I can't see it in either, which
would be a pity. I thought the idea was to provide
