On 17 November 2005 06:15, Esa Ilari Vuokko wrote:
I tried to compile ghc from cvs head in windows, hosting and
targetting mingw. When I got ghc to compile, it crashes while
parsing (I putStrLn-debugged) package.conf, but only from installed
position.
Basically, somewhere inside
Yes it's deliberate. (Turned out to be easy and convenient.) Yes it
goes beyond H98, so GHC types a few too many programs even in H98 mode.
I guess I should document it.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
one could. but GHC doesn't. feels low prio to me...
| -Original Message-
| From: Ross Paterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: 17 November 2005 12:45
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: kind inference
|
| On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 12:32:37PM
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 12:46:31PM -, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
On 17 November 2005 12:45, Ross Paterson wrote:
| I think the H98 rule is arbitrarily restrictive. But what about
| going further and considering the occurrences of type constructors
| in instance declarations, type signature
On 11/17/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17 November 2005 06:15, Esa Ilari Vuokko wrote:
I haven't seen this, but I'm just updating my Windows build to try to
reproduce. Does it happen with the stage1 or stage2 compiler? What
version of GHC are you bootstrapping with?
Stage2,
On 11/17/05, Esa Ilari Vuokko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will start a new clean build, hope it goes away and I need to look into
buying
non-broken hardware... ;)
The build failed and I sent mail about it on cvs-ghc list this time, even if
something seemed to rip away my message and just leave
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:17:02PM +, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 12:46:31PM -, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
On 17 November 2005 12:45, Ross Paterson wrote:
| I think the H98 rule is arbitrarily restrictive. But what about
| going further and considering the
