Dear GHC and Cabal developers and users,
I suggest to use `runhaskell' rather than `runghc'.
Because it looks to have more sense, and also for political correctness.
Cabal is a tool for `making' various Haskell implementations.
In 2015, we may have implementations ghc, Hugs, hbc, foo_1, ...,
Dear GHC developers,
I am preparing a bug report for the compiler of ghc-6.8.0.20070928-src:
--
GBasFld_.hs:387:45: Warning: Defined but not used: `t'
ghc-6.8.0.20070928: panic! (the 'impossible' happened)
(GHC version 6.8.0.20070928 for i386-unknown-linux):
initC:
On 9/30/07, Serge D. Mechveliani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear GHC and Cabal developers and users,
I suggest to use `runhaskell' rather than `runghc'.
Because it looks to have more sense, and also for political correctness.
Cabal is a tool for `making' various Haskell implementations.
In
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 11:08:19AM +0200, Bas van Dijk wrote:
On 9/30/07, Serge D. Mechveliani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear GHC and Cabal developers and users,
I suggest to use `runhaskell' rather than `runghc'.
Because it looks to have more sense, and also for political correctness.
Dear GHC developers,
this is a bug report on ghc-6.8.1-candidate.
The archive
http://botik.ru/pub/local/Mechveliani/ghcBugs/bug-6.8.0-sep28.zip
contains a project for which `making' under ghc-6.8.0.20070928-src
produces a report of kind
Hello Benedikt,
I apologise for the late reply. I am travelling tomorrow but I will
try to get something an alpha implementation out by this Wednesday.
For now here are some preliminary answers:
On Sep 28, 2007, at 7:41 AM, Benedikt Huber wrote:
Am 18.09.2007 um 05:49 schrieb Peter
