Brian Strand wrote:
Unfortunately I'm still stuck on x86-64, since there are no "official"
binaries to bootstrap from on that platform. But at least I have a ghc
to play with while waiting for x86-64 to become official.
There is a x86_64 build already in Fedora Haskell.
Perhaps you can try it?
Brian Strand wrote:
I originally tried the binary distribution but ran into library
issues. That is of course the obvious path to try, and try it I did.
Rather than going straight to installing deprecated libraries, I tried
to provide some feedback on ghc (especially since 6.4 RCs are out).
We
Wolfgang Thaller wrote:
Thanks, good to know; I'll read through 10.2 more carefully. I didn't
think I'd need to cross-compile x86-linux to x86-linux.
You don't need to - the recommended way is to download a binary version.
If you don't like using binary distributions, then use it for
bootstrap
Hi
I got ghc-6.5 prerelease from the CVS and managed to get it up and
running, *except* for ghci, the interactive part.
It worked last time I tried.
Is there something in particular that I need to think about to make
ghci support get compiled into ghc?
When using ghc-inplace, make sure you're usi
Hi
I got ghc-6.5 prerelease from the CVS and managed to get it up and
running, *except* for ghci, the interactive part.
Is there something in particular that I need to think about to make
ghci support get compiled into ghc?
Johan Glimming.
___
Glasgow
Thanks, good to know; I'll read through 10.2 more carefully. I didn't
think I'd need to cross-compile x86-linux to x86-linux.
You don't need to - the recommended way is to download a binary
version. If you don't like using binary distributions, then use it for
bootstrapping only, i.e. use it to
Simon Marlow wrote:
On 22 February 2005 20:05, Brian Strand wrote:
[ snipped ]
You actually need the .hc source files too, which don't come with the
source distribution because they have to be built for each target
platform.
That section of the Building Guide wasn't really clear enough on this
issu
On 22 February 2005 20:05, Brian Strand wrote:
> I'm having some serious "issues" getting GHC to run on Suse 9.2/x86
> (or x86-64 for that matter, although I didn't really expect that to
> work without some pain and suffering). I've had no luck with 6.2.2,
> or any 6.4 release candidate. Here is
On 23 February 2005 11:01, Brian Strand wrote:
> Thanks a lot! For anyone who runs into the same problem, here is
> what I did:
>
> 1. Converted to an rpm via "alien -r ghc6_6.2.2-3_amd64.deb"
> 2. Installed the resulting rpm.
> 3. When I tried to run ghc6, I got
>
> /usr/lib/ghc-6.2.2 # /usr/b
On 22 February 2005 19:37, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> Excellent! Thanks a lot.
>
> Any hint as to when the next Haddock release will be?
Maybe when I've got this GHC release out of the way and my hair has
grown back :-S
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mai
On 22 February 2005 14:35, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> However, it could be worthwhile halting with an error message.
>
> case `pwd` in
> *' '*)
> echo "Error: nhc98 will not build in a directory with spaces
> anywhere" echo " in the full pathname."
> echo "Su
OK, done. I've documented infix classes too.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johan Glimming
| Sent: 17 February 2005 10:04
| To:
; Simon Marlow
| Subject: Re: GHC-problem with parsing infix type synonym
Anders Höckersten wrote:
...
There are some debian packages of ghc 6.2.2 and related stuff for amd64
located here:
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/pool/unstable/main/amd64/g/ghc6/
Hopefully you can find some way to convert these to a format you can
install (there are programs for
Brian Strand wrote:
Jens Petersen wrote:
Brian Strand wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some serious "issues" getting GHC to run on Suse 9.2/x86
(or x86-64
for that matter, although I didn't really expect that to work
without some pain
and suffering). I've had no luck with 6.2.2, or any 6.4 release
cand
Jens Petersen wrote:
Brian Strand wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some serious "issues" getting GHC to run on Suse 9.2/x86
(or x86-64
for that matter, although I didn't really expect that to work without
some pain
and suffering). I've had no luck with 6.2.2, or any 6.4 release
candidate. Here is a typ
15 matches
Mail list logo
