Hello Barney,
Thursday, October 8, 2009, 12:58:01 AM, you wrote:
Incidentally, 6.12 doesn't appear to be in http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/
, only in the Darcs repo. Was that intentional?
it's not yet released: http://haskell.org/ghc/
--
Best regards,
Bulat
David Menendez:
Is there any consensus about what needs to be done to get a working
ghc installation on a Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6) system? The Mac OS
X wiki page[1] currently links to a blog post[2] that recommends
manually patching /usr/bin/ghc, but I have also seen recommendations
that
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 18:32 +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
David Menendez:
Is there any consensus about what needs to be done to get a working
ghc installation on a Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6) system? The Mac OS
X wiki page[1] currently links to a blog post[2] that recommends
Latest set of problems. I've tried using the i386 build of GHC 6.10.4
to build the x86_64 version in the manner that I described in an
earlier post. I'm not getting any segfaults now, but instead it says
the following during make:
/Users/bjs/Desktop/GHC_Build/ghc-6.10.4/libraries/cabal-bin
I've encountered the problem with weak symbols also, and filed a bug report
against ghc (#).
Weak symbols are used by gcc (with elf) to accommodate C++'s compilation model.
In C++, it's permitted to define class methods and template code in header
files. Because header files can be
On 07/10/2009 21:58, Barney Stratford wrote:
I'm back in Cambridge now. Snowdonia was great, and just as wet as
expected.
As far as I'm aware, nobody's got a fully functioning Snow Leopard GHC
yet. Just before going away, I tried to use my partly-functioning 64-bit
GHC to build 6.10, but found
So which compiler is generating the bogus code here? Is this the
stage1 x86-64 compiler, or the i386 compiler?
It's the stage1 x86_64 compiler. The problem here is that
375900174587920 doesn't even fit into 64 bits, hence the
assembler's complaint.
Cheers,
Barney.
On 08/10/2009 15:07, Barney Stratford wrote:
So which compiler is generating the bogus code here? Is this the
stage1 x86-64 compiler, or the i386 compiler?
It's the stage1 x86_64 compiler. The problem here is that
375900174587920 doesn't even fit into 64 bits, hence the
assembler's
I've been using ghc 6.10.3 on 64-bit Linux to compile my application,
and it runs OK, modulo bugs.
I want to debug a problem, so I load it in ghci, but when i type main
I get:
Loading package network-2.2.1.1 ...
GHCi runtime linker: fatal error: I found a duplicate definition for symbol
