On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 10:49, Ken Smith via GLLUG
mailto:gllug@mailman.lug.org.uk>> wrote:
Ken Smith via GLLUG wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I wonder if someone with Debian and pxe understanding might
point me
> in the right direction.
>
&g
Ken Smith via GLLUG wrote:
Hi All,
I wonder if someone with Debian and pxe understanding might point me
in the right direction.
I have a Rocky server with dhcp/tftp/httpd that hosts Rocky and Fedora
as pxe bootable images. It works fine.
I'm trying to do similar for Debian 12
Hi All,
I wonder if someone with Debian and pxe understanding might point me in
the right direction.
I have a Rocky server with dhcp/tftp/httpd that hosts Rocky and Fedora
as pxe bootable images. It works fine.
I'm trying to do similar for Debian 12 but not quite getting the right
Marco van Beek via GLLUG wrote:
On 10/10/2022 22:54, Ken Smith via GLLUG wrote:
I'm trying to sort out a Rocky 8.5 server that has sendmail
installed. (Please don't go on a diversion about how I should tell
the owner to dump sendmail and switch to exim or postfix - save that
for another
I'm trying to sort out a Rocky 8.5 server that has sendmail installed.
(Please don't go on a diversion about how I should tell the owner to
dump sendmail and switch to exim or postfix - save that for another
thread please. )
I'm pretty good with sendmail but this problem has me a bit foxed.
Chris Bell wrote:
On Sunday, 15 May 2022 17:32:50 BST you wrote:
Chris Bell via GLLUG wrote:
On Sunday, 15 May 2022 13:37:10 BST Ken Smith via GLLUG wrote:
Any pearls of wisdom either about my question or about recovering a
miscreant ML350 motherboard that won't boot anything or go
Chris Bell via GLLUG wrote:
On Sunday, 15 May 2022 13:37:10 BST Ken Smith via GLLUG wrote:
Any pearls of wisdom either about my question or about recovering a
miscreant ML350 motherboard that won't boot anything or go into the
setup pages.
Thanks
Ken
Hello Ken,
I had a very lightly loaded
Hi All, This might seem a bit of an off the wall question. Would running
the 5.4 Kernel stress a system such that it could cause a motherboard
failure? I can't think how but.
More details — I’m running (or was running) various KVM VM’s as well as
MythTV server on the host machine with
Andy Smith via GLLUG wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:19:32AM +, Ken Smith via GLLUG wrote:
I'm contemplating a system where I pass a LVM LV through to a KVM VM.
On the host I'm thinking that I could do a backup of the LV using a LVM
snapshot.
What am I missing, is this a mad
Hi All,
I'm contemplating a system where I pass a LVM LV through to a KVM VM.
On the host I'm thinking that I could do a backup of the LV using a LVM
snapshot.
What am I missing, is this a mad idea?
Thanks
Ken
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
John Winters via GLLUG wrote:
On 04/10/2020 18:21, James Roberts via GLLUG wrote:
[snip]
I've done this a lot in the past and now I just don't. Disks are
cheaper than my time, so I am prepared to multi-boot, but not from
one disk.
[snip]
IIWM I'd acquire another disk or two and put
Hi All,
I have a machine I use for Music recording. It has an old Fedora 13
install and it also boots Server 2003 and Win 7. Its high time it was
upgraded to something current and my plan is to add Fedora 32 and Win
10. I'd like to keep the old installs as they host music software I'd
like
James Courtier-Dutton via GLLUG wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 08:55, Tim Woodall via GLLUG
wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020, Ken Smith via GLLUG wrote:
Hi All,
While in lockdown I decided to do some performance testing on KVM.
Interesting, I've been looking into this myself trying to improve
Mike Brodbelt via GLLUG wrote:
On 09/06/2020 22:52, Ken Smith via GLLUG wrote:
I can' t help thinking that there must be something more behind a
drop from 60MB/s to 15MB/s in write performance
Can't speak to your exact bottleneck here, but I think I'd try and
eliminate your disk
Martin A. Brooks via GLLUG wrote:
The more levels of indirection you have between any 2 components in a
system the slower stuff will move.
Indeed. So wouldn't passing a block device from the host through to the
guest minimise the 'components' that are 'in the way'
I can' t help thinking
Hi All,
While in lockdown I decided to do some performance testing on KVM. I had
believed that passing a block device through to a guest rather than
using a QCOW2 file would get better performance. I wanted to see whether
that was true and indeed whether using iSCSI storage was any
16 matches
Mail list logo
