Forgot to detail about the problems/race. Details inline!
- Original Message -
> From: "Susant Palai"
> To: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Thursday, 10 March, 2016 11:35:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Posix lock migration design
>
> Update:
>
> Here is an initial solution on how to solv
Update:
Here is an initial solution on how to solve races between (fd-migration with
lock migration) and (client-disconnect with lock migration).
Please give your suggestion and comments.
Fuse fd migration:
---
part1: Fuse fd migration with out fd association
- How
On 03/08/2016 08:09 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding. I am looking at this core. Will
update with my findings/patches.
I think this is happening because dict-data is not guaranteed to have
refs at the time of accessing it just because we have a ref on the
On 03/09/2016 11:16 PM, Ajil Abraham wrote:
> Thank you Joseph. I fell sick and stayed out of action. Hope to
> continue end of this week. Planning to subscribe to gluster-devel. Any
> criteria to be met for approving my request?
No, you can subscribe to the list.
>
> -Ajil
>
> On Sat, Mar 5
On 03/09/2016 10:30 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
Hey Vijay,
Has the tagging happened yet?
Not yet. Most patches for 3.7.9 are in at this point in time. I am
tracking a memory leak fix in glusterd as the last patch [1]. I will be
starting tests after the glusterd patch is in and if everything looks
On 03/09/2016 12:11 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
Hi,
Arbiter test, ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter.t has failed for many regression runs.
./tests/basic/afr/arbiter.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 50 Failed: 3)
Failed tests: 22, 25, 48
Regression link
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2G
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:30:24PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
>> > Any comments before I merge the patch
>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13393/ ?
>>
>> The proposal
Thank you Joseph. I fell sick and stayed out of action. Hope to continue
end of this week. Planning to subscribe to gluster-devel. Any criteria to
be met for approving my request?
-Ajil
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Joseph Fernandes
wrote:
>
> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentatio
Apologies for missing this out as I had some personal commitments. After
having a look at the meeting logs, here are the AIs I take on myself:
1. Work with hagarth to put up a community host calendar.
2. Update on overall GD2 status (I have a plan to share a demo recording of
the current state of
Hi,
Arbiter test, ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter.t has failed for many regression runs.
./tests/basic/afr/arbiter.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 50 Failed: 3)
Failed tests: 22, 25, 48
Regression link
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/18980/console
Can you please look into thi
On 03/09/2016 09:05 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 03/09/2016 02:25 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 03/09/2016 10:40 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Atin Mukherjee
wrote:
On 03/08/2016 07:32 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
Hi all,
We had quite a good turnout for our first trial of the new time. Some
of the expected people weren't around, but hopefully they show up in
the next meeting on the 23rd.
The minutes and log for today's meeting are at,
- Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-03-0
Hi All,
The following patch is sent to address changelog rpc mem-leak issues.
The fix is intricate and needs lot of testing before taking in. Please
review the same.
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13658/1
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
- Original Message -
> From: "Venky Shankar"
> To
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
> Hey Vijay,
> Has the tagging happened yet?
If not, it's good to have this patch[1] in.
[1]: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13630/
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>> Hey All,
>>
>> I am planning to have 3.7.9 tagged somet
regards
Aravinda
On 03/09/2016 06:22 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 03/09/2016 12:45 AM, Aravinda wrote:
regards
Aravinda
On 03/08/2016 11:34 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
On 03/07/2016 05:13 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote:
Added gluster-users.
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
- Original Me
Hey Vijay,
Has the tagging happened yet?
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I am planning to have 3.7.9 tagged sometime in the 2nd half of this week. In
> order to facilitate that, it would be great if we can have all necessary
> patches for 3.7.9 in release-3.7 b
On 9 March 2016 at 19:39, Kaushal M wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:02 PM, M S Vishwanath Bhat
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When we were discussing about the readiness of distaf for upstream test
> > automation, this question came up, That we should have a process or
> workflow
> > for proposing,
Hi all,
As announced last week, this weeks community meeting is scheduled to
begin at 1500UTC (~5 minutes from now), in #gluster-meeting on
Freenode.
The agenda is available at
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-community-meetings as always.
Please add any other topic you'd like to discuss unde
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:02 PM, M S Vishwanath Bhat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When we were discussing about the readiness of distaf for upstream test
> automation, this question came up, That we should have a process or workflow
> for proposing, reviewing and including the tests somewhere.
>
> Right now th
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Shyam wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 02:25 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/09/2016 10:40 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Atin Mukherjee
>>> wrote:
On 03/08/2016 07:32 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
Hi,
When we were discussing about the readiness of distaf for upstream test
automation, this question came up, That we should have a process or
workflow for proposing, reviewing and including the tests somewhere.
Right now the tests are part of distaf repository (github.com/gluster/distaf)
itself
> When this command is executed, volfile is requested with volfile-id
> '/vol/subdir1'
> Glusterd on seeing this volfile-id will generate the client xlator with
> remote-subvolume appending '/subdir1'
I don't think GlusterD needs to be involved here at all. See below.
> When graph initialization
On 03/09/2016 02:25 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 03/09/2016 10:40 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Atin Mukherjee
wrote:
On 03/08/2016 07:32 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
Late last week I sent a solution for how to achieve
subdirectory-mount
On 03/09/2016 12:45 AM, Aravinda wrote:
regards
Aravinda
On 03/08/2016 11:34 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
On 03/07/2016 05:13 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote:
Added gluster-users.
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
- Original Message -
From: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar"
To: "G
Hi Anuradha,
Sorry for late reply.
Please find the requested logs below:
Remote: 10.32.0.48
Local : 10.32.1.144
Local:
#gluster volume heal c_glusterfs info split-brain
Brick 10.32.1.144:/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick
Number of entries in split-brain: 0
Brick 10.32.0.48:/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick
Number of en
hi,
I have installed GlusterFS 3.7.6 by yum and now I want to install GlusterFS
3.3.0 for testing. I execute 'yum remove glusterfs glusterfs-server' ,then
'gluster --version',it showed GlusterFS 3.7.6 built on .
How to uninstall the GlusterFS 3.7.6 and install 3.3.0?
Release version: Cen
26 matches
Mail list logo