+Vijay Mallikarjuna
- Original Message -
> From: "Avra Sengupta"
> To: "Raghavendra Bhat"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 7:27:17 PM
> Subject: [Gluster-devel] Testcase broken due to posix iatt commit
>
> Hi Raghavendra,
>
> As part of the patch (http://review.glu
Submitted patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13837/, to keep the
previous behavior of posix_acl_ctx_get to include for the GS hotfix.
We will fix actual issue of sending lookup on root as a separate bug.
Thanks,
Vijay
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna <
vmall...@redha
Hi
I am trying to debug the EC translator using gdb, following the method
suggested by Jeff Darcy, using the vol file shown below.
volume my-posix
type storage/posix
option directory /play/export
end-volume
volume my-ec
type cluster/my-ec
subvolumes my-posix
Previously function 'posix_acl_ctx_get' was creating inode_ctx if it is not
present. So if sometime lookup does not come for root inode, then inode-ctx
was created here without any perm set.
Now inode-ctx is created only in lookup_cbk and setattr_cbk to populate the
ctx with valid perm from statbuf
On 03/28/2016 09:34 AM, FNU Raghavendra Manjunath wrote:
I can understand the concern. But I think instead of generally
converting all the ESTALE errors ENOENT, probably we should try to
analyze the errors that are generated by lower layers (like posix).
Even fuse kernel module some times retur
Root inode gets linked during mount itselsf.
We get lookups on root. But since root inode is always present in the inode
table, after the mount if there is a fop on an entry whose parent is root,
then that fop will be able to find the parent in the inode table as part of
resolve. So it need not ex
Hi Du/Johny,
Don't we get a lookup on root inode? Please confirm.
If we don't get lookup on root inode, then we need to create inode-ctx in a
posix_acl_ctx_get() function.
Thanks,
Vijay
On 28-Mar-2016 7:37 PM, "FNU Raghavendra Manjunath"
wrote:
> CCing Vijay Kumar who made the acl related chan
CCing Vijay Kumar who made the acl related changes in that patch.
Vijay? Can you please look into it?
Regards,
Raghavendra
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> Hi Raghavendra,
>
> As part of the patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13730/16), the
> inode_ctx is not created i
Hi Raghavendra,
As part of the patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13730/16), the
inode_ctx is not created in posix_acl_ctx_get(). Because of this the
testcase in http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13623/ breaks. It fails with
the following logs:
[2016-03-28 13:43:39.216168] D [MSGID: 0]
[io-th
I can understand the concern. But I think instead of generally converting
all the ESTALE errors ENOENT, probably we should try to analyze the errors
that are generated by lower layers (like posix).
Even fuse kernel module some times returns ESTALE. (Well, I can see it
returning ESTALE errors in so
Hello,
Any one tell me about the all cases when the replicated volume becomes
distributed apart from the remove-brick.
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster
- Original Message -
> From: "Kaushal M"
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Could you please provide updates on the state of the 3.5.9 and 3.6.10
> releases?
>
> 3.5.9 has been tagged but hasn't had an announcement made yet.
Fedora and EPEL packages of 3.5.9 are on download.gluster.org now.
Ubuntu pa
12 matches
Mail list logo
