Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

As the majority seem to favour Prashanth's approach, I vote for it as well. Just to make it clearer for all users, please add a **highlighted** note in the README that informs any visitor to the github page of the change. On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Raghavendra Talur

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Aravinda wrote: > +1 for Prashanth's approach. > +1 > regards > Aravinda > > On 05/18/2016 03:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy > Chirammal

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Idea: Alternate Release process

I'm in favour of a stable release every 2 months and an LTS once a year (option 2). As Oleksander already suggested, I'm in favour of having well defined merge windows, freeze dates and testing period. (A slightly modified timeline from Oleksander's proposal follows) For every 2 month window, - 1

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

+1 for Prashanth's approach. regards Aravinda On 05/18/2016 03:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: All in favor of the 'everyone

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Idea: Alternate Release process

A bit late but better than never. My vote is for option 2. ~Atin On 05/18/2016 07:19 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > [Adding gluster-users] > > I would like to wrap this poll by the next community meeting on 25th > May. Can you please weigh in with your opinions on the options > provided by Aravinda?

[Gluster-devel] Falling tests for glusterfs 3.6.9

Hi, I have tested glusterfs 3.6.9 in Fedora 21 (64-bit version), on a VirtualBox (version 5.0.18 r106667) with 5.8 GiB Memory and an Intel(r) Core(tm) i5-4300M CPU @ 2.60GHz Processor and the following tests are failing in the clean version, with no further changes in the code: Test

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-devel] Reviewing Rackspace Use

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:20:30PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le mercredi 18 mai 2016 à 12:13 +0200, Niels de Vos a écrit : > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > > > Le mercredi 18 mai 2016 à 09:53 +0200, Niels de Vos a écrit : > > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at

Re: [Gluster-devel] Idea: Alternate Release process

On 13 May 2016 at 13:46, Aravinda wrote: > Hi, > > Based on the discussion in last community meeting and previous discussions, > > 1. Too frequent releases are difficult to manage.(without dedicated > release manager) > 2. Users wants to see features early for testing or

Re: [Gluster-devel] Idea: Alternate Release process

[Adding gluster-users] I would like to wrap this poll by the next community meeting on 25th May. Can you please weigh in with your opinions on the options provided by Aravinda? Thanks! Vijay On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Aravinda wrote: > Hi, > > Based on the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

I'm in favor of Prashant's approach. More data points: There are only 15 people who've opened pull requests. Most of them are people who already work on the project and are aware of this change. I'm not sure how many people used the command-line vs used GitHub's UI. This leaves a very small

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-devel] Reviewing Rackspace Use

Le mercredi 18 mai 2016 à 12:13 +0200, Niels de Vos a écrit : > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Le mercredi 18 mai 2016 à 09:53 +0200, Niels de Vos a écrit : > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:28:25PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:50

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> All in favor of the 'everyone working on this should clone again' >> approach. > Both approaches

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-devel] Reviewing Rackspace Use

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le mercredi 18 mai 2016 à 09:53 +0200, Niels de Vos a écrit : > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:28:25PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > > > > Over the last year

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > > > > >> > All in favor of the 'everyone working on this should clone again' > approach. > +2 on the same thought. :) > > > > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le mercredi 18 mai 2016 à 05:35 -0400, Prashanth Pai a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > I tried out BFG tool on my github fork of glusterdocs project. > > > > $ git count-objects -vH | grep size-pack > > size-pack: 62.88

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

Le mercredi 18 mai 2016 à 05:35 -0400, Prashanth Pai a écrit : > Hi all, > > I tried out BFG tool on my github fork of glusterdocs project. > > $ git count-objects -vH | grep size-pack > size-pack: 62.88 MiB > > $ cd .. > $ java -jar bfg-1.12.12.jar --delete-files '*.{odp,pdf}' glusterdocs.git

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

Hi all, I tried out BFG tool on my github fork of glusterdocs project. $ git count-objects -vH | grep size-pack size-pack: 62.88 MiB $ cd .. $ java -jar bfg-1.12.12.jar --delete-files '*.{odp,pdf}' glusterdocs.git $ cd glusterdocs.git $ git reflog expire --expire=now --all && git gc --prune=now

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggest a feature redirect

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal < humble.deva...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Amye, > > afaict, the feature proposal has start from glusterfs-specs ( > http://review.gluster.org/#/q/project:glusterfs-specs) project under > review.gluster.org > > --Humble > > > On Wed, May 18,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggest a feature redirect

Hi Amye, afaict, the feature proposal has start from glusterfs-specs ( http://review.gluster.org/#/q/project:glusterfs-specs) project under review.gluster.org --Humble On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > Currently on the gluster.org website, we're

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-devel] Reviewing Rackspace Use

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:28:25PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > > Over the last year or so, the Rackspace use seems to have gone up pretty > > steadily. While Rackspace is being awesome and supporting us as an open > > source

Re: [Gluster-devel] Maintainership

Hi All, We are evolving guidelines for managing maintainer lifecycle and will be sharing the document here soon. Let us adhere to the new process outlined there for all changes to MAINTAINERS going forward. Thanks! Vijay On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Saravanakumar Arumugam

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-devel] Reviewing Rackspace Use

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > Over the last year or so, the Rackspace use seems to have gone up pretty > steadily. While Rackspace is being awesome and supporting us as an open > source project, this usage has been growing in ways that we can't always >

[Gluster-devel] Suggest a feature redirect

Currently on the gluster.org website, we're directing the 'Suggest a feature' to the old mediawiki site for 'Features'. http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features In an ideal world, this would go somewhere else. Where should this go? Let me know and I'll fix it. - amye --

Re: [Gluster-devel] Maintainership

Hi, On 05/13/2016 11:19 AM, Venky Shankar wrote: On 16-05-11 11:55:10, Aravinda wrote: I would like to propose Kotresh. +2 from my side. Thanks Aravinda. Noted. It would be great to also have a backup maintainer. Anyone for that? I am volunteering for backup maintainer. Thanks, Saravana