Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

Hi everybody, I suppose there will be a lot more people affected by removal of the driver from Cinder who do not know about it. I am running production clusters on Mitaka and Newton and did not know about the issue - Openstack is quite a beast to keep pace with the updates. Are there any news

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Proposal]: New branch (earlier: Changes to how we test and vote each patch)

All, Here is another proposal, which I would like to start immediately to enable many features possible for Gluster 4.0 release. We will create a 'new' branch called '*experimental*', where anyone can post a patch, for which only jenkins job which runs is 'smoke' (build + fops validation).

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

> On 30 May 2017, at 19:58, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Zhang Huan" > >> To: "Raghavendra G" > > >> Cc: "GlusterFS

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

On 05/30/2017 03:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 05/30/2017 06:37 PM, Joe Julian wrote: On 05/30/2017 03:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 05/27/2017 03:02 AM, Joe Julian wrote: On 05/26/2017 11:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Joe Julian

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

On 05/30/2017 06:37 PM, Joe Julian wrote: On 05/30/2017 03:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 05/27/2017 03:02 AM, Joe Julian wrote: On 05/26/2017 11:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Joe Julian > wrote:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

On 05/30/2017 03:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 05/27/2017 03:02 AM, Joe Julian wrote: On 05/26/2017 11:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Joe Julian > wrote: Forwarded for posterity and follow-up.

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

On 05/27/2017 03:02 AM, Joe Julian wrote: On 05/26/2017 11:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Joe Julian > wrote: Forwarded for posterity and follow-up. Forwarded Message

[Gluster-devel] Release 3.11.0: Tagged, packaged and released!

Hi, 3.11.0 has been tagged and packages are built, thanks to all for your contributions and help. With this the release tracker bug for 3.11.0 is closed and a 3.11.1 tracker is open [1]. Future bugs for 3.11.1 need to be marked as a blocker against this. Thanks, Kaushal & Shyam [1]

[Gluster-devel] Announcing GlusterFS release 3.11.0 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.11.0 (packages available at [1]). This is a short term maintenance (STM) Gluster release that includes some substantial changes. he features revolve around, improvements to small file workloads, SE Linux support, Halo

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.12 and 4.0: Thoughts on scope

- Original Message - > From: "Amar Tumballi" > To: "Shyam" , "Vijay Bellur" , > "Prasanna Kalever" , > "Ram Edara" > Cc: "Gluster Devel" > Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.12 and 4.0: Thoughts on scope

I couldn't get time to get back on this list completely. While this looks mostly fine, there are few things I wanted to add. - Check with few features which users are asking for long, and we are still not able to get to it. (Is there such a list somewhere? I prefer that to be migrated to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Volgen support for loading trace and io-stats translators at specific points in the graph

On 05/30/2017 05:28 AM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: You're right. With brick graphs, this will be a problem. Couple of options: 1. To begin with we identify points where we think it would be useful to load io-stats in the brick graph and unconditionally have glusterd-volgen load them in the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.11: Release notes updates!!! (1 day remaining)

On 05/30/2017 12:43 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:31:22AM -0400, Shyam wrote: On 05/25/2017 05:23 PM, Shyam wrote: Hi, If your name is on the following list, we need your help in updating the release notes and thus closing out the final stages of 3.11 release. Please do

[Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2017-05-30-1b1f871c (master branch)

GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2017-05-30-1b1f871c ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

- Original Message - > From: "Zhang Huan" > To: "Raghavendra G" > Cc: "GlusterFS Maintainers" , "Gluster Devel" > , "Kaushal Madappa" > > Sent: Tuesday, May 30,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

> On 29 May 2017, at 11:16, Raghavendra G wrote: > > Replying to all queries here: > > * Is it a bug or performance enhancement? > Its a performance enhancement. No functionality is broken if this patch is > not taken in. > > * Are there performance numbers to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.12 and 4.0: Thoughts on scope

Xavi and I would like to propose transaction framework for 4.0 as a stretch goal. -Krutika On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Shyam wrote: > Hi, > > Let's start a bit early on 3.12 and 4.0 roadmap items, as there have been > quite a few discussions around this in various

Re: [Gluster-devel] Volgen support for loading trace and io-stats translators at specific points in the graph

You're right. With brick graphs, this will be a problem. Couple of options: 1. To begin with we identify points where we think it would be useful to load io-stats in the brick graph and unconditionally have glusterd-volgen load them in the volfile only at these places (not very useful if we want