Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster volume stop and the regressions

2018-02-13 Thread Milind Changire
The volume stop, in brick-mux mode reveals a race with my patch [1] Although this behavior is 100% reproducible with my patch, this, by no means, implies that my patch is buggy. In brick-mux mode, during volume stop, when glusterd sends a brick-detach message to the brick process for the last bric

[Gluster-devel] run-tests-in-vagrant

2018-02-13 Thread Nigel Babu
Hello, Centos CI has a run-tests-in-vagrant job. Do we continue to need this anymore? It still runs master and 3.8. I don't see this job adding much value at this point given we only look at results that are on build.gluster.org. I'd like to use the extra capacity for other tests that will run on

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs and Structured data

2018-02-13 Thread Raghavendra G
I've started marking "whiteboard" of bugs in this class with tag "GLUSTERFS_METADATA_INCONSISTENCY". Please add the tag to any bugs which you deem to fit in. On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > > To

[Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2018-02-13-e67cd078 (master branch)

2018-02-13 Thread staticanalysis
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2018-02-13-e67cd078 ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman