Re: [Gluster-devel] [NFS-Ganesha-Devel] Re: Problems about cache virtual glusterfs ACLs for ganesha in md-cache

On 10/12/18 12:04 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote: 1. Cache it separately as posix ACLs (a new option maybe "cache-glusterfs-acl" is added); And make sure _posix_xattr_get_set fills them when lookup requests. I am not sure if posix layer can handle it. Virtual xattrs are in-memory and not sto

Re: [Gluster-devel] [NFS-Ganesha-Devel] Re: Problems about cache virtual glusterfs ACLs for ganesha in md-cache

On 10/12/18 7:22 AM, Kinglong Mee wrote: On 2018/10/11 19:09, Soumya Koduri wrote: NFS-Ganesha's md-cache layer already does extensive caching of attributes and ACLs of each file looked upon. Do you see any additional benefit with turning on gluster md-cache as well?  More replies inline..

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 5: GA and what are we waiting on

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:16 PM Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:55 PM Shyam Ranganathan > wrote: > >> So we are through with a series of checks and tasks on release-5 (like >> ensuring all backports to other branches are present in 5, upgrade >> testing, basic performanc

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Missing option documentation (need inputs)

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:30 PM Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > The following options were added post 4.1 and are part of 5.0 as the > first release for the same. They were added in as part of bugs, and > hence looking at github issues to track them as enhancements did not > catch the same. > > We nee

Re: [Gluster-devel] Problems about cache virtual glusterfs ACLs for ganesha in md-cache

On 2018/10/11 19:09, Soumya Koduri wrote: > NFS-Ganesha's md-cache layer already does extensive caching of attributes and > ACLs of each file looked upon. Do you see any additional benefit with turning > on gluster md-cache as well?  More replies inline.. Yes, I think. The logical is different

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 5: GA and what are we waiting on

On 10/11/2018 11:25 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > 1) Fix for libgfapi-python related blocker on Gluster: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630804 @du @krutika, the root cause for the above issue is from the commit, commit c9bde3021202f1d5c5a2d19ac05a510fc1f788ac https://review.glus

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 5: GA and what are we waiting on

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:55 PM Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > So we are through with a series of checks and tasks on release-5 (like > ensuring all backports to other branches are present in 5, upgrade > testing, basic performance testing, Package testing, etc.), but still > need the following resol

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Missing option documentation (need inputs)

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:30 PM Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > The following options were added post 4.1 and are part of 5.0 as the > first release for the same. They were added in as part of bugs, and > hence looking at github issues to track them as enhancements did not > catch the same. > > We nee

[Gluster-devel] Release 5: GA and what are we waiting on

So we are through with a series of checks and tasks on release-5 (like ensuring all backports to other branches are present in 5, upgrade testing, basic performance testing, Package testing, etc.), but still need the following resolved else we stand to delay the release GA tagging, which I hope to

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Missing option documentation (need inputs)

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:00:50AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 10/10/2018 11:20 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:30, Shyam Ranganathan > > wrote: > > > > The following options were added post 4.1 and are part of 5.0 as the

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Missing option documentation (need inputs)

On 11 October 2018 at 18:30, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 10/10/2018 11:20 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:30, Shyam Ranganathan > > wrote: > > > > The following options were added post 4.1 and are part of 5.0 as the > > first

[Gluster-devel] when there are dangling entry(without gfid) in only one brick dir, the glusterfs heal info will keep showing the entry, glustershd can not really remove this entry from brick .

Hi glusterfs expert, I meet one problem in my test bed (3 brick on 3 sn nodes), the "/" is always in glusterfs v heal info output. In my ftest+reboot-sn-nodes-randomly test, the gluster v heal info output keeps showing entry "/" even for hours, and even you do some touch or ls of /mnt/mstate , i

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Missing option documentation (need inputs)

On 10/10/2018 11:20 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:30, Shyam Ranganathan > wrote: > > The following options were added post 4.1 and are part of 5.0 as the > first release for the same. They were added in as part of bugs, and > h

Re: [Gluster-devel] Problems about cache virtual glusterfs ACLs for ganesha in md-cache

NFS-Ganesha's md-cache layer already does extensive caching of attributes and ACLs of each file looked upon. Do you see any additional benefit with turning on gluster md-cache as well? More replies inline.. On 10/11/18 7:47 AM, Kinglong Mee wrote: Cc nfs-ganesha, Md-cache has option "cache-p

Re: [Gluster-devel] Problems about cache virtual glusterfs ACLs for ganesha in md-cache

On 2018/10/11 12:10, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote:> On Thursday 11 October 2018 08:10 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 7:47 AM Kinglong Mee > > wrote: >> >> Cc nfs-ganesha, >> >> Md-cache has option "cache-posix-acl" that controls cachin