Hi All,
We are blocked on 3.7.12 owing to this proposal. Appreciate any
feedback on this!
Thanks,
Vijay
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have encountered a spate of regressions in recent 3.7.x releases. The
> 3.7.x maintainers are
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Raghavendra Talur
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Atin Mukherjee
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In the view of keeping the visibility of
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Raghavendra Talur
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Atin Mukherjee
> wrote:
>
>> In the view of keeping the visibility of the work completed vs work in
>> progress and getting some fruitful feedback from the
Resend.
N.B. Fedora 24 just entered Beta. The plan is to update GlusterFS to 3.8
in Fedora24 before Fedora24 GA. GlusterFS-3.8 will be the standard
version of GlusterFS for the life of Fedora24. Other versions of
GlusterFS will be available for Fedora24 on download.gluster.org.
N.B. Starting
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:25:35PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Checkout glusterfs script that is capable of showing your list of commits
> missed (backporting) in other branches (say 3.7.12) w.r.t master
>
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14230/
>
>
> This script helps in
- Original Message -
> From: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Raghavendra Talur" , "Gluster Devel"
> , "Jeff Cody"
> , "Rajesh Joseph"
I've uploaded a patch for this problem:
http://review.gluster.org/14270
Any review will be very appreciated :)
Thanks,
Xavi
On 09/05/16 12:35, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Xavier Hernandez"
To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mercredi 04 mai 2016 à 10:42 +0530, Rajesh Joseph a écrit :
> > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that a snaphot regression test managed to trigger a core
- Original Message -
> From: "Xavier Hernandez"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 3:07:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Possible bug in the communications layer ?
>
Hi Raghavendra,
I've finally found the bug. It was obvious but I didn't see it.
1561 case SP_STATE_ACCEPTED_SUCCESS_REPLY_INIT:
1562 default_read_size = xdr_sizeof ((xdrproc_t)
xdr_gfs3_read_rsp,
1563 _rsp);
1564
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 12:02:56PM +0530, Milind Changire wrote:
> Niels, Kaleb,
> With Niels' commit 4ac2ff18db62db192c49affd8591e846c810667a
> reverting Manu's commit 1fbcecb72ef3525823536b640d244d1e5127a37f
> on upstream master, and w.r.t. Kaleb's patch
> http://review.gluster.org/14243
> with
Hi all,
checkout http://review.gluster.org/14230
I have added more cool features in patch set 2 to meet both developers
as well as release maintainers expectations.
Thanks,
--
Prasanna
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 12:03
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Joseph Fernandes wrote:
>
> > ./tests/performance/open-behind.t is failing continuously on 3.7.11
>
> This is the fate of non enforced tests. It may be a good idea to
> invetigate it: perhaps NetBSD
Hi,
Reply inline
Regards,
Poornima
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Raghavendra Talur"
> Cc: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" , "Gluster Devel"
> , "Jeff Cody"
>
Hi,
This is what happens when glfs_set_xlator_option is called:
- It updates ctx->cmd_args->xlator_options
- gf_add_cmdline_options (during glusterfs_graph_prepare.. pub_glfs_init) adds
it to xl->options
- glusterfs_graph_unknown_options (during glusterfs_graph_activate..
pub_glfs_init) checks
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> In the view of keeping the visibility of the work completed vs work in
> progress and getting some fruitful feedback from the community we are
> thinking of having a hangout/bluejeans session for 30-45 minutes once in
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Talur"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" , "Gluster Devel"
> , "Jeff Cody"
> , "Rajesh Joseph"
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> 1. We use the weekly community meeting slot once in a month
> or 2. Have a dedicated separate slot (probably @ 12:00 UTC, last
> Thursday of each month)
[2] would be nicer to set up a calendar for.
--
sankarshan
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
> Hi Poornima/Raghavendra,
>
> This mail is an initiation of a thread to discuss how to make xlator
> options setting in gfapi synchronous (so, that caller will know the result)
> or providing a cbk to let the
In the view of keeping the visibility of the work completed vs work in
progress and getting some fruitful feedback from the community we are
thinking of having a hangout/bluejeans session for 30-45 minutes once in
every month. The sessions will be concentrating on discussing the work
done over the
20 matches
Mail list logo