Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t - regression failures

2017-05-14 Thread Ravishankar N
On 05/12/2017 03:33 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: |tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t| is the 2nd in the list. All failures (https://fstat.gluster.org/weeks/1/failure/2) are in netbsd and looks like an

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t - regression failures

2017-05-14 Thread Ravishankar N
On 05/14/2017 10:05 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya > wrote: Hey Atin, I had a look at "tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t". The test case passes in

[Gluster-devel] Gerrit submit type (was tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1447266/bug-1447266.t)

2017-05-14 Thread Nigel Babu
We use the "cherry-pick" submit type for glusterfs on Gerrit[1]. In the past, Poornima has pointed this out as well. I believe there was no interest in changing the submit type[2] because the other submit types do not add metadata to the commit itself. [1]:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.2: Scheduled for the 30th of April

2017-05-14 Thread Raghavendra Talur
Glusterfs 3.10.2 has been tagged. Packages for the various distributions will be available in a few days, and with that a more formal release announcement will be made. - Tagged code: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/tree/v3.10.2 - Release notes:

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t - regression failures

2017-05-14 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > Hey Atin, > > I had a look at "tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav- > child-policy.t". > The test case passes in my local system with latest master. I also tried > cherry picking some of the patches

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1447266/bug-1447266.t

2017-05-14 Thread Jeff Darcy
On Sat, May 13, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > We'd need https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17177/ to be merged before > this test starts working. Even though https://review.gluster.org/17177 > was dependent on https://review.gluster.org/17216 , gerrit didn't > disallow this patch to be