Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS Documentation Improvements - An Update

idea as well :) -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] [Cross-posted] Re: Gentle Reminder.. (Was: GlusterFS Documentation Improvements - An Update)

like to port your documents, send a pull request. [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs [2] https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs/issues -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] Troubleshooting and Diagnostic tools for Gluster

rded in a log from one part of an installed system to a possible symptom? Or, do a collection of events lead up to an observed failure (which, in turn, is recorded as a series of events on the logs)? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> __

Re: [Gluster-devel] Troubleshooting and Diagnostic tools for Gluster

x/solution? Does this proposal anticipate such a progression? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster readdocs unaccessible

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Avra Sengupta <aseng...@redhat.com> wrote: > I am unable to access gluster.readdocs.org . Is anyone else facing the same > issue. <https://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/> ? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sa

Re: [Gluster-devel] question about how to handle bugs filed against End-Of-Life versions of glusterfs

ect this, but please reopen it if the problem persists after upgrading to the latest version of Fedora, which is available from:http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] removing "Target Release" from GlusterFS bug reports.

n > the Bug Triage process at > http://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Contributors-Guide/Bug-Triage/ > > Any objections? Has it ever been used to add context to a filed bug? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> _

Re: [Gluster-devel] Idea: Alternate Release process

with the previous >>>>> release? >>>>> Should we be maintaining compatibility with LTS releases with the >>>>> latest release? >>>> >>>> Each LTS release will have seperate list of features to be >>>> e

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release Management Process change - proposal

on June 2nd. > 3. All maintainers to ack content and stability of components by June 9th. > 4. Release 3.7.12 around June 9th after we have all acks in place. Would 3 days be sufficient to get the content for the website and a bit of PR written up? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://ab

Re: [Gluster-devel] Google Summer of Code Application opens Feb 8th - Call For Mentors

expected to come up with a number (more than one) of ideas which are also attached with (at least) one mentor. More at <https://flossmanuals.net/GSoCMentoring/making-your-ideas-page/> (as a manner of guidance) -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> __

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggest a feature redirect

e best thing to do. The individual contributing the feature idea needs to know that something was done with it and it wasn't a /dev/null -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluste

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Community Meeting [was:Re: [Gluster-users] Show and Tell sessions for Gluster 4.0]

- it could be a good idea to create space for participation - whether in the form of thinking over the agenda or, times which suit such participants. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

oad.gluster.org should ideally remain for binaries (install-ready objects) than presentations. There are specialized web properties for presentations and video which can be better ways to do this. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sanka

Re: [Gluster-devel] Show and Tell sessions for Gluster 4.0

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote: > 1. We use the weekly community meeting slot once in a month > or 2. Have a dedicated separate slot (probably @ 12:00 UTC, last > Thursday of each month) [2] would be nicer to set up a calendar for.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposing a framework to leverage existing Python unit test standards for our testing

2. Using > Glusto Overview, and "8. Running Unit Tests"--then pick and choose from > there. I finally had a bit of time to go through the videos in sequence. And I'd like to put out a note of thanks for compiling them for everyone in the project to take a look at.

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-devel] Documentation Tooling Review

in place by end of September. This is a good start. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] performance issues Manoj found in EC testing

workload based on > back-of-the-envelope calculations. Is it possible to provide additional detail about this exercise in terms of setup; tests executed; data sets generated? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> _

Re: [Gluster-devel] Backup support for GlusterFS

ght directories are > also accessible to the clients connected to the source. Perhaps this is when the developers of snapshot feature would need to chime in on the possible sequence of things to be done. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sa

Re: [Gluster-devel] Post mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0

us know if you think we should ask more questions here. > > -- > Aravinda & Pranith -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regular Performance Regression Testing

acked. > [1] https://github.com/avati/perf-test/blob/master/perf-test.sh -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API new Port requirement

f requesting the IANA for assignment of a new service name and port number value? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API new Port requirement

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:03:03PM +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > This definitely has my preference

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterd2 - Some anticipated changes to glusterfs source

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Milind Changire wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Kaushal M wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Niels de Vos

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: tendrl-release v1.5.0 (Milestone1) is available

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > Thank you Rohan for letting us know about this release! > > I looked for screenshots of the dashboard and found a few at [1]. Are there > more screenshots that you can share with us? > The Metrics page (URL below) was

Re: [Gluster-devel] Questions on github

age we can also make > sure at least we respond to questions which is pending. Is the on-going discussion in this thread about using <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues> as a method to have questions and responses from the community? -- sankarshan mukhop

Re: [Gluster-devel] Questions on github

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay > <sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redh

Re: [Gluster-devel] Questions on github

ailing list *might* move over to Github issues. There are obvious advantages to using Issues. But there are also a small number of must-do things to manage this approach. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Glus

Re: [Gluster-devel] Questions on github

y this outcome is achieved is when the developers/maintainers/those-who-know respond more often. The tooling or, medium is not what is the crucial part here. However, it becomes critical when there are far too many of avenues and too little attention on a regular basis. *That* is a far from ideal situa

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: [CentOS-devel] ansible in CentOS Extras

aran.org/publickey.asc -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.12: Glusto run status

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 00:23, Shwetha Panduranga > wrote: >> >> Hi Shyam, we are already doing it. we wait for rebalance status to be >> complete. We loop. we keep checking if the status is

Re: [Gluster-devel] How long should metrics collection on a cluster take?

e latest already available > would be returned and we are not going to fetch them when queried. This is > both fragile (imagine an entity that doesn't respond well) and adds latency > and will be inaccurate anyway a split second later. > > Y. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

that duplication is avoided) to >> get this to a GREEN status. >> >> GREEN: >> 1. cpp-check >> 2. RPM builds >> >> IGNORE (for now): >> 1. clang scan (@nigel, this job requires clang warnings to be fixed to >> go green, right?) >> >> Shyam -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

ompleted within stipulated time, but > restarted again post cleanup_func was invoked. > > Digging a little further the manner of cleanup_func and traps used in > this test seem *interesting* and maybe needs a closer look to arrive at > possible issues here. > > @Mohit, request you

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

the tests were passing. It happened > on > both machine instances I tried. > Ugh! -infra team should have an issue to work with and resolve this. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-de

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

>> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_-crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit?usp=sharing >> >> [4] Nightly run dashboard: https://build.gluster.org/job/nightly-master/ > > Locking master is fine, this seems like there's been ample notice and

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Gluster Documentation Hackathon - 7/19 through 7/23

let us know if you have any questions. > > Thanks, > Amar & Vijay > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/11LLGA-bwuamPOrKunxojzAEpHEGQxv8VJ68L3aKdPns/edit?usp=sharing > -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay>

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python components and test coverage

gt; > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] How long should metrics collection on a cluster take?

rs on how to come to a conclusion > about which path to take and what problems to solve. > > I will be happy to raise github issues based on our conclusions on this mail > thread. > > -- > Pranith > -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> __

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: LTM release targeted for end of May

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Shyam Ranganathan > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> As we wind down on 4.0 activities (waiting on docs to hit the site, and >> packages to be available in

Re: [Gluster-devel] POC- Distributed regression testing framework

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:10 AM Sanju Rakonde wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:26 PM Deepshikha Khandelwal > wrote: >> >> Hello folks, >> >> Distributed-regression job[1] is now a part of Gluster's >> nightly-master build pipeline. The following are the issues we have >> resolved since we

Re: [Gluster-devel] Latency analysis of GlusterFS' network layer for pgbench

[pulling the conclusions up to enable better in-line] > Conclusions: > > We should never have a volume with caching-related xlators disabled. The > price we pay for it is too high. We need to make them work consistently and > aggressively to avoid as many requests as we can. Are there current

Re: [Gluster-devel] Implementing multiplexing for self heal client.

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 6:30 PM RAFI KC wrote: > > Hi All, > > What is the problem? > As of now self-heal client is running as one daemon per node, this means > even if there are multiple volumes, there will only be one self-heal > daemon. So to take effect of each configuration changes in the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Latency analysis of GlusterFS' network layer for pgbench

On Fri 28 Dec, 2018, 12:44 Raghavendra Gowdappa > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 6:05 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:40 PM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < >> sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Glusto Happenings

t; >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > -- > Amye Scavarda | a...@redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead > __

Re: [Gluster-devel] Following up on the "Github teams/repo cleanup"

On Fri 29 Mar, 2019, 01:04 Vijay Bellur, wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:39 AM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < > sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:34 PM John Strunk wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for bringing this

Re: [Gluster-devel] Following up on the "Github teams/repo cleanup"

ant for the future of the > project. > I agree. And so, I am looking forward to additional individuals/maintainers agreeing to this so that we can codify it under the Gluster.org Github org too. > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:21 PM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay > wrote: >> >> The on

[Gluster-devel] Following up on the "Github teams/repo cleanup"

The one at I am not sure if the proposal from Michael was agreed to separately and it was done. Also, do we want to do this periodically? Feedback is appreciated. ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] 8/10 AWS jenkins builders disconnected

1] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22290/ -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] Github#268 Compatibility with Alpine Linux

Saw some recent activity on - is there a plan to address this or, should the interested users be informed about other plans? /s ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

[Gluster-devel] requesting review available gluster* plugins in sos

is (as might just be widely known) an extensible, portable, support data collection tool primarily aimed at Linux distributions and other UNIX-like operating systems. At present there are 2 plugins

Re: [Gluster-devel] requesting review available gluster* plugins in sos

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:00 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > From glusterd perspective couple of enhancements I'd propose to be added (a) > to capture get-state dump and make it part of sosreport . Off late, we have > seen get-state dump has been very helpful in debugging few cases apart from >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:24 PM Yaniv Kaul wrote: >> Smallfile is part of CI? I am happy to see it documented @ >> https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Performance%20Testing/#smallfile-distributed-io-benchmark >> , so at least one can know how to execute it manually. > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] More intelligent file distribution across subvols of DHT when file size is known

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 6:53 PM Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > > Hi, > > I've proposed a solution to the problem of space running out in some children > of DHT even when its other children have free space available, here - > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/675. > > The proposal aims to

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:42 PM Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Hi developers, > > With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around this > topic. > > We from gluster org (in github.com/gluster) have many projects which follow > complete github workflow, where as there are few,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 5.10

Would it be necessary to update the 5.10 release notes with this being a "known issue"? On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:07 AM Hari Gowtham wrote: > > Hi, > > Hubert, I can see the 5.9 folder contains 5.9 packages. > > Alan, We just made a release for 5.10.So we can take this in for 5.11. > Can you

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Modifying gluster's logging mechanism

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 7:44 AM Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi Barak, > > My replies inline. > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 6:34 PM Barak Sason Rofman > wrote: > >> >> [snip] > >> Initial tests, done by *removing logging from the regression testing, >> shows an improvement of about 20% in run time*.

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Modifying gluster's logging mechanism

The original proposal from Barak has merit for planning towards an alpha form to be available. Has the project moved away from writing specifications and reviewing those proposals? Earlier, we used to see those rather than discuss in multi-threaded list emails. While recorded gains in performance

Re: [Gluster-devel] Community Meeting: Make it more reachable

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 17:14 Sunny Kumar wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:50 AM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 15:03, Sunny Kumar wrote: > > > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > I would like to propose

[Gluster-devel] reminder: release 8 release notes tracker

This note is a reminder to add the topics which are being proposed to be included in the release notes. As part of a previous meeting, there is now an issue which tracks this https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/813 ___ Community Meeting

[Gluster-devel] following up on the work underway for improvements in ls-l - looking for the data on the test runs

We talked about a set of planned work underway which bring about substantial improvements in ls-l and similar workloads. Do we have the (a) data from the test runs to be shared more widely (b) the patchsets and issues to track this work? ___ Community

Re: [Gluster-devel] Community Meeting: Make it more reachable

On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 15:03, Sunny Kumar wrote: > > Hello folks, > > I would like to propose moving community meeting to a time which is > more suitable for EMEA/NA zone, that is merging both of the zone > specific meetings into a single one. > I am aware that there are 2 sets of meetings now -

[Gluster-devel] gluster_gd2-nightly-rpms - do we need to continue to build for this?

There is no practical work being done on gd2, do we need to continue to have a build job? On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 05:46, wrote: > > See <https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_gd2-nightly-rpms/643/display/redirect> > -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sanka

[Gluster-devel] [cross posted] Gluster Community Meeting; component updates and untriaged bugs

In a previous instance of the APAC meeting of the Gluster community I had mentioned about looking at the component update section and considering providing a report on the untriaged bug load. The rationale is to ensure that instead of a large mess of "unknown" bugs, the maintainers (and thus the

[Gluster-devel] Following up on the Gluster 8 conversation from the community meeting

I had mentioned that I'll reach out to Amar to urge about making progress on Gluster 8. We did have a conversation and upon reviewing the present state of the list of issues/features with the release label, Amar would be setting up a meeting to obtain a more pragmatic and reality based plan. It is