Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Code Metrics Weekly Report

latest run: Coverity > <https://scan.coverity.com/projects/gluster-glusterfs> Clang > <https://build.gluster.org/job/clang-scan/lastBuild> Code Coverage > <https://build.gluster.org/job/line-coverage/lastCompletedBuild/Line_20Coverage_20Report/index.html> &g

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Meeting minutes for the Gluster community meeting held on 25-05-2021

Ayush - thank you for hosting what is your first Gluster community meeting! It was an excellent effort at keeping the conversation moving along. Some additional comments in-line. On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 17:52, Ayush Ujjwal wrote: > > # Gluster Community Meeting - 25/05/2021 [snip] > * Project

Re: [Gluster-devel] Archiving old projects

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 21:04, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Le lundi 01 février 2021 à 18:40 +0530, sankarshan a écrit : > > Seems reasonable to do this spring cleaning. I'd like to suggest that > > we add this as an agenda topic to an upcoming meeting and have it on > > reco

Re: [Gluster-devel] Archiving old projects

Seems reasonable to do this spring cleaning. I'd like to suggest that we add this as an agenda topic to an upcoming meeting and have it on record prior to moving ahead? Do you mind terribly to track this via an issue which can be referenced in the meeting? On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 18:26, Michael

Re: [Gluster-devel] Removing problematic language in geo-replication

: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Gluster-devel mailing list > >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org > >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > >> > > Aravinda Vishwanathapura > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Holiday vacation (from tonight to the 4th of January)

Season's greetings and happy holidays. I wish you a restful vacation and let's get to meet virtually in 2021! On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 15:59, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Hi folks, > > just a quick note, I will be in in vacation starting tonight until > Monday the 4th of January 2021. > My Out of

[Gluster-devel] On the topic of being intentional and making conscious efforts around problematic language

This morning I was reading the post at https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/update-red-hats-conscious-language-efforts and while it inexplicably makes no reference to the efforts within Gluster (hat tip to Ravishankar, Aravinda, Kotresh and others) there is work being undertaken at

Re: [Gluster-devel] NFS Ganesha fails to export a volume

likely to be one-off. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 Gluster-devel mailing

Re: [Gluster-devel] Meeting minutes for Gluster Community Meeting on 27-10-2020

a meeting in NA time slices? > > --- > > ### Attendance > Name (#gluster-dev alias) - company > * Nikhil Ladha - Red Hat > * sankarshan - Kadalu.IO > * Pranith Kumar Karampuri - PhonePe > * Vinayak Hariharmath - RedHat > * Ravi - Red Hat > * Sunil Kumar -

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-infra] ACTION REQUESTED: Migrate your glusterfs patches from Gerrit to GitHub

om/orgs/gluster/teams/gluster-maintainers >>>> >>>> >>>> There are a lot of people in that group that haven't been involved with >>>> Gluster for a long time. >>> >>> Also there are new contributors, time to update! >> >> >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Rebalance improvement.

/hardware? What is the configuration on which these numbers were recorded? > DirSize - 1Million Old New %diff Depth - 100 (Run 1) 353 74 +377% Depth - 100 > (Run 2) 348 72 +377~% Depth - 50 246 122 +100% Depth - 3 174 114 +52% > > Susant -- sankarshan mukhop

Re: [Gluster-devel] Introducing me, questions on general improvements in gluster re. latency and throughput

Federico - welcome again! It was fantastic to have you at the Community Meeting. You bring up an interesting perspective - of how to onboard a participant by providing specific and focused conversations. I am hoping that this note is one where Xavi and Amar can respond in order to provide some of

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Upgrade of the FreeBSD builder

On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 23:22, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Hi, > > I did push this afternoon a role to automate the creation of FreeBSD > instance in ec2. So, this would make it easier to 1) upgrade the > builder 2) support more than 1 version. > > Unless someone has objection, I do intend to switch

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Minutes of Gluster Community Meeting [12th May 2020]

On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 12:39, Xavi Hernandez wrote: >> > ### User stories >> > * [Hari] users are hesitant to upgrade. A good number of issues in >> > release-7 (crashes, flooding of logs, self heal) Need to look into this. >> > * [Sunil] Increase in inode size >> >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Minutes of Gluster Community Meeting [12th May 2020]

+/24372/ Have the small set of questions on the notes been addressed? Also, do we have plans to move this workflow over to GitHub issues? In other words, how long are we planning to continue to work with dual systems? > ### RoundTable > * [Sunil] Do we support cento8 and gluster? > *

Re: [Gluster-devel] Action required: stale bot

I do not think that "a comment" is a sufficient indicator of the capacity and interest to work on the issue. While this will suffice for the first pass of identifying issues which will not be worked upon, it is also easy to create a different-than-desired outcome by leaving comments. Regardless

Re: [Gluster-devel] Multithreaded Iterative Dir Tree Scan

on and the implementation are welcome. >> >> -- >> *Barak Sason Rofman* >> >> Gluster Storage Development >> >> Red Hat Israel <https://www.redhat.com/> >> >> 34 Jerusalem rd. Ra'anana, 43501 >> >> bsaso...@redhat.com T: *+972-

Re: [Gluster-devel] Switching GlusterFS upstream bugs to Github issues

Thank you for making this happen. This is the first phase of adopting a more GitHub based development workflow including actions. On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 21:29, Deepshikha Khandelwal wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > We have migrated most of the current upstream bugs(attached below) from the >

Re: [Gluster-devel] following up on the work underway for improvements in ls-l - looking for the data on the test runs

What is the configuration/sizing on which these tests are conducted? Do you need any additional help from others on the patches which you have used for the tests? On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 13:32, Mohit Agrawal wrote: > > With these 2 changes, we are getting a good improvement in file creation and >

Re: [Gluster-devel] following up on the work underway for improvements in ls-l - looking for the data on the test runs

Following up on this - where are we in terms of readiness around sharing observations and recorded data? On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 12:13, sankarshan wrote: > > Following up on this smaller list - who is working on the improvements > and has the data to be shared? > > On Wed, 29 Ja

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: [netdata/netdata] Gluster monitoring (#4824)

Given NIshanth Thomas and his team members have previously worked on this topic, they may be the subject matter experts the "sponsor" role requires. Reading it would seem that the role would need a high touch consultation On

[Gluster-devel] gluster_gd2-nightly-rpms - do we need to continue to build for this?

There is no practical work being done on gd2, do we need to continue to have a build job? On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 05:46, wrote: > > See <https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_gd2-nightly-rpms/643/display/redirect> > -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sanka

Re: [Gluster-devel] Community Meeting: Make it more reachable

=9=0=0=54=48=179=1800> works for participants from EMEA. On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 09:02, sankarshan wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020, 18:37 Sunny Kumar wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:47 AM sankarshan wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, 6

Re: [Gluster-devel] Community Meeting: Make it more reachable

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020, 18:37 Sunny Kumar wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:47 AM sankarshan wrote: > > > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 16:24, Yati Padia wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > In response to the discussion that we had about the timings of the > commu

Re: [Gluster-devel] Community Meeting: Make it more reachable

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 16:24, Yati Padia wrote: > > Hi, > In response to the discussion that we had about the timings of the community > meeting, I would like to propose that we can have it at 3PM/4PM IST on 11th > February to accommodate EMEA/NA zone and if it suits all, we can fix the >

[Gluster-devel] Feedback on the community meetings

I wanted to take a moment to highlight a small set of things about the community meetings. Sunny has already brought forward the issue of time/TZs and participation. There are few additional aspects + content : the meeting is built on a template. This is very useful as a guide and I am sure it

Re: [Gluster-devel] Community Meeting: Make it more reachable

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 17:14 Sunny Kumar wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:50 AM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 15:03, Sunny Kumar wrote: > > > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > I would like to propose

Re: [Gluster-devel] Community Meeting: Make it more reachable

On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 15:03, Sunny Kumar wrote: > > Hello folks, > > I would like to propose moving community meeting to a time which is > more suitable for EMEA/NA zone, that is merging both of the zone > specific meetings into a single one. > I am aware that there are 2 sets of meetings now -

[Gluster-devel] following up on the work underway for improvements in ls-l - looking for the data on the test runs

We talked about a set of planned work underway which bring about substantial improvements in ls-l and similar workloads. Do we have the (a) data from the test runs to be shared more widely (b) the patchsets and issues to track this work? ___ Community

[Gluster-devel] reminder: release 8 release notes tracker

This note is a reminder to add the topics which are being proposed to be included in the release notes. As part of a previous meeting, there is now an issue which tracks this https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/813 ___ Community Meeting

[Gluster-devel] [cross posted] Gluster Community Meeting; component updates and untriaged bugs

In a previous instance of the APAC meeting of the Gluster community I had mentioned about looking at the component update section and considering providing a report on the untriaged bug load. The rationale is to ensure that instead of a large mess of "unknown" bugs, the maintainers (and thus the

[Gluster-devel] Following up on the Gluster 8 conversation from the community meeting

I had mentioned that I'll reach out to Amar to urge about making progress on Gluster 8. We did have a conversation and upon reviewing the present state of the list of issues/features with the release label, Amar would be setting up a meeting to obtain a more pragmatic and reality based plan. It is

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Modifying gluster's logging mechanism

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 7:44 AM Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi Barak, > > My replies inline. > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 6:34 PM Barak Sason Rofman > wrote: > >> >> [snip] > >> Initial tests, done by *removing logging from the regression testing, >> shows an improvement of about 20% in run time*.

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Modifying gluster's logging mechanism

The original proposal from Barak has merit for planning towards an alpha form to be available. Has the project moved away from writing specifications and reviewing those proposals? Earlier, we used to see those rather than discuss in multi-threaded list emails. While recorded gains in performance

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 5.10

Would it be necessary to update the 5.10 release notes with this being a "known issue"? On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:07 AM Hari Gowtham wrote: > > Hi, > > Hubert, I can see the 5.9 folder contains 5.9 packages. > > Alan, We just made a release for 5.10.So we can take this in for 5.11. > Can you

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:42 PM Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Hi developers, > > With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around this > topic. > > We from gluster org (in github.com/gluster) have many projects which follow > complete github workflow, where as there are few,

Re: [Gluster-devel] More intelligent file distribution across subvols of DHT when file size is known

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 6:53 PM Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > > Hi, > > I've proposed a solution to the problem of space running out in some children > of DHT even when its other children have free space available, here - > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/675. > > The proposal aims to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Following up on the "Github teams/repo cleanup"

On Fri 29 Mar, 2019, 01:04 Vijay Bellur, wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:39 AM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < > sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:34 PM John Strunk wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for bringing this

Re: [Gluster-devel] Following up on the "Github teams/repo cleanup"

ant for the future of the > project. > I agree. And so, I am looking forward to additional individuals/maintainers agreeing to this so that we can codify it under the Gluster.org Github org too. > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:21 PM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay > wrote: >> >> The on

[Gluster-devel] Following up on the "Github teams/repo cleanup"

The one at I am not sure if the proposal from Michael was agreed to separately and it was done. Also, do we want to do this periodically? Feedback is appreciated. ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] requesting review available gluster* plugins in sos

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:00 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > From glusterd perspective couple of enhancements I'd propose to be added (a) > to capture get-state dump and make it part of sosreport . Off late, we have > seen get-state dump has been very helpful in debugging few cases apart from >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:24 PM Yaniv Kaul wrote: >> Smallfile is part of CI? I am happy to see it documented @ >> https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Performance%20Testing/#smallfile-distributed-io-benchmark >> , so at least one can know how to execute it manually. > > >

[Gluster-devel] requesting review available gluster* plugins in sos

is (as might just be widely known) an extensible, portable, support data collection tool primarily aimed at Linux distributions and other UNIX-like operating systems. At present there are 2 plugins

[Gluster-devel] Github#268 Compatibility with Alpine Linux

Saw some recent activity on - is there a plan to address this or, should the interested users be informed about other plans? /s ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] 8/10 AWS jenkins builders disconnected

1] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22290/ -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Latency analysis of GlusterFS' network layer for pgbench

On Fri 28 Dec, 2018, 12:44 Raghavendra Gowdappa > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 6:05 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:40 PM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < >> sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] Implementing multiplexing for self heal client.

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 6:30 PM RAFI KC wrote: > > Hi All, > > What is the problem? > As of now self-heal client is running as one daemon per node, this means > even if there are multiple volumes, there will only be one self-heal > daemon. So to take effect of each configuration changes in the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Latency analysis of GlusterFS' network layer for pgbench

[pulling the conclusions up to enable better in-line] > Conclusions: > > We should never have a volume with caching-related xlators disabled. The > price we pay for it is too high. We need to make them work consistently and > aggressively to avoid as many requests as we can. Are there current

Re: [Gluster-devel] POC- Distributed regression testing framework

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:10 AM Sanju Rakonde wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:26 PM Deepshikha Khandelwal > wrote: >> >> Hello folks, >> >> Distributed-regression job[1] is now a part of Gluster's >> nightly-master build pipeline. The following are the issues we have >> resolved since we

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Glusto Happenings

t; >> ___ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > -- > Amye Scavarda | a...@redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead > __

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python components and test coverage

gt; > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Gluster Documentation Hackathon - 7/19 through 7/23

let us know if you have any questions. > > Thanks, > Amar & Vijay > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/11LLGA-bwuamPOrKunxojzAEpHEGQxv8VJ68L3aKdPns/edit?usp=sharing > -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay>

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

>> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_-crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit?usp=sharing >> >> [4] Nightly run dashboard: https://build.gluster.org/job/nightly-master/ > > Locking master is fine, this seems like there's been ample notice and

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

the tests were passing. It happened > on > both machine instances I tried. > Ugh! -infra team should have an issue to work with and resolve this. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-de

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

ompleted within stipulated time, but > restarted again post cleanup_func was invoked. > > Digging a little further the manner of cleanup_func and traps used in > this test seem *interesting* and maybe needs a closer look to arrive at > possible issues here. > > @Mohit, request you

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

that duplication is avoided) to >> get this to a GREEN status. >> >> GREEN: >> 1. cpp-check >> 2. RPM builds >> >> IGNORE (for now): >> 1. clang scan (@nigel, this job requires clang warnings to be fixed to >> go green, right?) >> >> Shyam -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] How long should metrics collection on a cluster take?

e latest already available > would be returned and we are not going to fetch them when queried. This is > both fragile (imagine an entity that doesn't respond well) and adds latency > and will be inaccurate anyway a split second later. > > Y. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] How long should metrics collection on a cluster take?

rs on how to come to a conclusion > about which path to take and what problems to solve. > > I will be happy to raise github issues based on our conclusions on this mail > thread. > > -- > Pranith > -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> __

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1: LTM release targeted for end of May

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Shyam Ranganathan > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> As we wind down on 4.0 activities (waiting on docs to hit the site, and >> packages to be available in

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: [CentOS-devel] ansible in CentOS Extras

aran.org/publickey.asc -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.12: Glusto run status

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 00:23, Shwetha Panduranga > wrote: >> >> Hi Shyam, we are already doing it. we wait for rebalance status to be >> complete. We loop. we keep checking if the status is

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterd2 - Some anticipated changes to glusterfs source

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Milind Changire wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Kaushal M wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Niels de Vos

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: tendrl-release v1.5.0 (Milestone1) is available

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > Thank you Rohan for letting us know about this release! > > I looked for screenshots of the dashboard and found a few at [1]. Are there > more screenshots that you can share with us? > The Metrics page (URL below) was

Re: [Gluster-devel] Questions on github

y this outcome is achieved is when the developers/maintainers/those-who-know respond more often. The tooling or, medium is not what is the crucial part here. However, it becomes critical when there are far too many of avenues and too little attention on a regular basis. *That* is a far from ideal situa

Re: [Gluster-devel] Questions on github

ailing list *might* move over to Github issues. There are obvious advantages to using Issues. But there are also a small number of must-do things to manage this approach. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Glus

Re: [Gluster-devel] Questions on github

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay > <sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redh

Re: [Gluster-devel] Questions on github

age we can also make > sure at least we respond to questions which is pending. Is the on-going discussion in this thread about using <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues> as a method to have questions and responses from the community? -- sankarshan mukhop

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API new Port requirement

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:03:03PM +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > This definitely has my preference

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API new Port requirement

f requesting the IANA for assignment of a new service name and port number value? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Post mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0

us know if you think we should ask more questions here. > > -- > Aravinda & Pranith -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regular Performance Regression Testing

acked. > [1] https://github.com/avati/perf-test/blob/master/perf-test.sh -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Backup support for GlusterFS

ght directories are > also accessible to the clients connected to the source. Perhaps this is when the developers of snapshot feature would need to chime in on the possible sequence of things to be done. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sa

Re: [Gluster-devel] [gluster-devel] Documentation Tooling Review

in place by end of September. This is a good start. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposing a framework to leverage existing Python unit test standards for our testing

2. Using > Glusto Overview, and "8. Running Unit Tests"--then pick and choose from > there. I finally had a bit of time to go through the videos in sequence. And I'd like to put out a note of thanks for compiling them for everyone in the project to take a look at.

Re: [Gluster-devel] performance issues Manoj found in EC testing

workload based on > back-of-the-envelope calculations. Is it possible to provide additional detail about this exercise in terms of setup; tests executed; data sets generated? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> _

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release Management Process change - proposal

on June 2nd. > 3. All maintainers to ack content and stability of components by June 9th. > 4. Release 3.7.12 around June 9th after we have all acks in place. Would 3 days be sufficient to get the content for the website and a bit of PR written up? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://ab

Re: [Gluster-devel] Idea: Alternate Release process

with the previous >>>>> release? >>>>> Should we be maintaining compatibility with LTS releases with the >>>>> latest release? >>>> >>>> Each LTS release will have seperate list of features to be >>>> e

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggest a feature redirect

e best thing to do. The individual contributing the feature idea needs to know that something was done with it and it wasn't a /dev/null -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluste

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

oad.gluster.org should ideally remain for binaries (install-ready objects) than presentations. There are specialized web properties for presentations and video which can be better ways to do this. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sanka

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Community Meeting [was:Re: [Gluster-users] Show and Tell sessions for Gluster 4.0]

- it could be a good idea to create space for participation - whether in the form of thinking over the agenda or, times which suit such participants. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list

Re: [Gluster-devel] Show and Tell sessions for Gluster 4.0

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote: > 1. We use the weekly community meeting slot once in a month > or 2. Have a dedicated separate slot (probably @ 12:00 UTC, last > Thursday of each month) [2] would be nicer to set up a calendar for.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Google Summer of Code Application opens Feb 8th - Call For Mentors

expected to come up with a number (more than one) of ideas which are also attached with (at least) one mentor. More at <https://flossmanuals.net/GSoCMentoring/making-your-ideas-page/> (as a manner of guidance) -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> __

Re: [Gluster-devel] removing "Target Release" from GlusterFS bug reports.

n > the Bug Triage process at > http://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Contributors-Guide/Bug-Triage/ > > Any objections? Has it ever been used to add context to a filed bug? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> _

Re: [Gluster-devel] Troubleshooting and Diagnostic tools for Gluster

rded in a log from one part of an installed system to a possible symptom? Or, do a collection of events lead up to an observed failure (which, in turn, is recorded as a series of events on the logs)? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> __

Re: [Gluster-devel] Troubleshooting and Diagnostic tools for Gluster

x/solution? Does this proposal anticipate such a progression? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster readdocs unaccessible

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Avra Sengupta <aseng...@redhat.com> wrote: > I am unable to access gluster.readdocs.org . Is anyone else facing the same > issue. <https://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/> ? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sa

Re: [Gluster-devel] question about how to handle bugs filed against End-Of-Life versions of glusterfs

ect this, but please reopen it if the problem persists after upgrading to the latest version of Fedora, which is available from:http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay> ___ Gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] Initial version of coreutils released

On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:19:54 +, Craig Cabrey wrote: I just pushed an initial version of the coreutils project that I have been working on during the course of this summer. There is still a lot to do, but I'm pretty excited about its start. Please check it out and if you want to help out,

[Gluster-devel] [Cross-posted] Re: Gentle Reminder.. (Was: GlusterFS Documentation Improvements - An Update)

like to port your documents, send a pull request. [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs [2] https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs/issues -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS Documentation Improvements - An Update

idea as well :) -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel