rom: "Prashanth Pai" <p...@redhat.com>
> To: "Amye Scavarda" <a...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, "Humble Chirammal"
> <hchir...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 12:35:35 PM
> S
;
> <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, "Humble Chirammal"
> <hchir...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 12:31:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git
> repository
>
> Prashanth,
> Is this something you can take on?
Prashanth,
Is this something you can take on?
Thanks!
- amye
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
> As the majority seem to favour Prashanth's approach, I vote for it as well.
>
> Just to make it clearer for all users, please add a **highlighted**
> note in
As the majority seem to favour Prashanth's approach, I vote for it as well.
Just to make it clearer for all users, please add a **highlighted**
note in the README that informs any visitor to the github page of the
change.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Raghavendra Talur
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Aravinda wrote:
> +1 for Prashanth's approach.
>
+1
> regards
> Aravinda
>
> On 05/18/2016 03:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy
> Chirammal
+1 for Prashanth's approach.
regards
Aravinda
On 05/18/2016 03:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal
wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
All in favor of the 'everyone
I'm in favor of Prashant's approach.
More data points: There are only 15 people who've opened pull requests.
Most of them are people who already work on the project and are aware of
this change. I'm not sure how many people used the command-line vs used
GitHub's UI. This leaves a very small
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>
>> All in favor of the 'everyone working on this should clone again'
>> approach.
>
Both approaches
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>
> All in favor of the 'everyone working on this should clone again'
> approach.
>
+2 on the same thought. :)
>
>
>
>
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Michael Scherer
wrote:
> Le mercredi 18 mai 2016 à 05:35 -0400, Prashanth Pai a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I tried out BFG tool on my github fork of glusterdocs project.
> >
> > $ git count-objects -vH | grep size-pack
> > size-pack: 62.88
Le mercredi 18 mai 2016 à 05:35 -0400, Prashanth Pai a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I tried out BFG tool on my github fork of glusterdocs project.
>
> $ git count-objects -vH | grep size-pack
> size-pack: 62.88 MiB
>
> $ cd ..
> $ java -jar bfg-1.12.12.jar --delete-files '*.{odp,pdf}' glusterdocs.git
quot;Amye Scavarda" <a...@redhat.com>
> To: "Nigel Babu" <nig...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Humble Chirammal" <hchir...@redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel"
> <gluster-devel@gluster.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:14:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gl
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> We could potentially setup travis-ci to do builds that'll fail loudly if
> we commit something that throws a warning. I've tried out the possibility
> here:
>
> https://travis-ci.org/nigelbabu/glusterdocs/jobs/130816121
>
>
We could potentially setup travis-ci to do builds that'll fail loudly if we
commit something that throws a warning. I've tried out the possibility here:
https://travis-ci.org/nigelbabu/glusterdocs/jobs/130816121
I've purposefully made it fail. Success looks like this:
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:42:27PM +0530, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > So we have a new slideshare.net account,
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:42:27PM +0530, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So we have a new slideshare.net account, GlusterCommunity (
> http://www.slideshare.net/GlusterCommunity/) that connects with the
> Gluster.org G+ community - and it'll even connect with the YouTube channel!
>
> I've
Hi all,
So we have a new slideshare.net account, GlusterCommunity (
http://www.slideshare.net/GlusterCommunity/) that connects with the
Gluster.org G+ community - and it'll even connect with the YouTube channel!
I've submitted a PR to the glusterdocs repo that will need some review: it
removes
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:55:23PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 02:56:52AM -0400, Prashanth Pai wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > > Right now, even cloning the main docs branch is a huge pain due to the
> >> >
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
> If required we could just host the presentations on download.gluster.org.
> I've seen it being used to host resources for tutorials previously
> (like disk images),
I'd put forward the notion that download.gluster.org
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 02:56:52AM -0400, Prashanth Pai wrote:
>>
>>
>> > > Right now, even cloning the main docs branch is a huge pain due to the
>> > > size
>> > > of the repo.
>> > > I think that branching will solve
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 02:56:52AM -0400, Prashanth Pai wrote:
>
>
> > > Right now, even cloning the main docs branch is a huge pain due to the
> > > size
> > > of the repo.
> > > I think that branching will solve not this problem, and might make the
> > > problem worse.
> >
> > Branching
> > Right now, even cloning the main docs branch is a huge pain due to the size
> > of the repo.
> > I think that branching will solve not this problem, and might make the
> > problem worse.
>
> Branching would not increase the size of the repository itself. Only the
> size used on RTD will be
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:06:16AM +0530, Amye Scavarda wrote:
...
> Right now, even cloning the main docs branch is a huge pain due to the size
> of the repo.
> I think that branching will solve not this problem, and might make the
> problem worse.
Branching would not increase the size of the
23 matches
Mail list logo