- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "RHS team in Bangalore"
> Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:50:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] [storage-blr] REMINDER: Gluster RPC Internals
This is being tracked @ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427404,
krutika posted a patch to move it to bad tests until we find why a lookup
on one file is leading to lookup on the hardlink instead.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Susant Palai wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
test case: ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t is seen to be failing on different
regression runs on master.
Requesting to look in to it.
Few instances:
https://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd7-regression/3118/consoleFull
https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/3451/
https://review.gluster.org/16462 has caused this regression as per the git
bisect.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This is being tracked @ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
> show_bug.cgi?id=1427404, krutika posted a patch to move it to bad
This has resurfaced even with the fix [1] attempted, refer [2]
[1]
https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16711/3/tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1303028-Rebalance-glusterd-rpc-connection-issue.t
[2] https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/3464/consoleFull
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Hari Gowtham
2 of 2 runs failed:
https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/3451/consoleFull
https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/3458/consoleFull
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
Hi,
With release 3.10 shipped [1], it is time to set the dates for release
3.11 (and subsequently 4.0).
This mail has the following sections, so please read or revisit as needed,
- Release 3.11 dates (the schedule)
- 3.11 focus areas
- 3.11 feature proposal changes (IMP: if you are
Can this patch be reverted asap as it has blocked other patches to get in?
IMO, we shouldn't be marking the test as bad given we know the patch which
introduced the regression.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> https://review.gluster.org/16462 has
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> Can this patch be reverted asap as it has blocked other patches to get in?
> IMO, we shouldn't be marking the test as bad given we know the patch which
> introduced the regression.
>
I've posted
With the release of 3.10, we're trying something new - a retrospective for
our release.
We're using the format of Stop/Start/Continue/Change for feedback, with
space for additional comments.
I'll keep this open for a week, until March 7, and we'll review this
feedback with the maintainers.
Go
There is a patch on this [1]. Reviews from wider audience will be helpful,
before we merge the patch.
https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16731/
regards,
Raghavendra
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Milind Changire
wrote:
> +gluster-users
>
> Milind
>
>
> On 01/11/2017 03:21
This is a reminder about todays meeting. The meeting will start at
1500UTC in #gluster-meeting on Freenode.
The meeting notepad is available at
https://bit.ly/gluster-community-meetings for you to add your updates
and topics for discussion.
___
Found the bug. Please see
https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16462/5/xlators/storage/posix/src/posix-handle.c@977
Will be posting the fix in some time.
-Krutika
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Atin Mukherjee
13 matches
Mail list logo