Hi All,
We realised ( Humble, Niels and I) that we dont have any documentation
regarding the $sub, while disscussing over a backport in #gluster-dev.
The below[1] wiki page is a result of this. Comments, feedbacks are welcome.
[1]
On 05/22/2014 08:37 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
I think we should run the regression tests with DEBUG builds so that
GF_ASSERTs are caught.
Excellent idea!, lets do it asap.
I will work with Justin to make sure we don't see too many failures before
turning it on. I also want
FYI,
To fix these Coverity issues , please check the below link for guidelines:
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Fixing_Issues_Reported_By_Tools_For_Static_Code_Analysis#Coverity
Thanks,
Lala
Original Message
Subject:New Defects reported by
FYI,
To fix these Coverity issues , please check the below link for how to
and guidelines:
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Fixing_Issues_Reported_By_Tools_For_Static_Code_Analysis#Coverity
Thanks,
Lala
Original Message
Subject:New Defects
On 06/24/2014 03:45 PM, Gluster Build System wrote:
SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.5.1.tar.gz
This release is made off jenkins-release-73
-- Gluster Build System
___
Gluster-users mailing list
On 07/07/2014 03:11 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 07/07/2014, at 2:50 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 07/06/2014 11:05 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 07/06/2014 07:47 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi Justin/Vijay,
I always felt '-1' saying 'I prefer you didn't submit this' is a
bit
On 05/30/2014 01:16 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
snip
Documentation in the wiki, mainly these pages:
- http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Main_Page#Developers
- http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Developers
- Over time make these new comers as
On 07/09/2014 12:11 AM, Gluster Build System wrote:
SRC:
http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.4.5beta2.tar.gz
This release is made off jenkins-release-80
-- Gluster Build System
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
To fix these Coverity issues , please check the below link for guidelines:
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Fixing_Issues_Reported_By_Tools_For_Static_Code_Analysis#Coverity
Thanks,
Lala
Original Message
Subject:New Defects reported by Coverity
On 07/18/2014 07:57 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
During testing of a 3*4 gluster (from master as of yesterday), I encountered
two major weirdnesses:
1. A 'rm -rf some_dir' needed several invocations to finish, each time
reporting a number of lines like these:
rm: cannot remove
I am trying to compile master for doing a fresh Coverity run. But
Coverity is complaining that source is not compiled fully. When I did
the same manually, I saw make is returning very less output compared
to past. I have copied the make output (along with autogen and
configure) in
On 07/22/2014 03:07 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
On 07/22/2014 03:01 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
I am trying to compile master for doing a fresh Coverity run. But
Coverity is complaining that source is not compiled fully. When I did
the same manually, I saw make is returning very less output
is available for all supported EPEL/Fedora versions. For
any other distribution or operating system, it takes about 3 mins to
download and compile.
Please let me know if you have any other questions.
- Luis
On 07/22/2014 02:23 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
On 07/21/2014 10:48 PM, Harshavardhana
and not been able to have been used. This is
why cmockery2 is set in the BuildRequires section.
Awesome!, now it make perfect sense to run these units tests during RPM
building. Thanks Luis.
On 07/22/2014 07:34 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
On 07/22/2014 04:35 PM, Luis Pabón wrote:
I understand
The issue is resolved now. make clean fixed the issue.
On 07/22/2014 03:34 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
On 07/22/2014 03:07 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
On 07/22/2014 03:01 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
I am trying to compile master for doing a fresh Coverity run. But
Coverity is complaining
To fix these Coverity issues , please check the below link for guidelines:
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Fixing_Issues_Reported_By_Tools_For_Static_Code_Analysis#Coverity
Thanks,
Lala
Original Message
Subject:New Defects reported by
RPMs for el5-7 (RHEL, CentOS, etc.), Fedora (19,20,21,22) are available
at download.gluster.org [1].
[1]
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/3.5.2beta1/
Thanks,
Lala
On 07/21/2014 09:05 PM, Gluster Build System wrote:
SRC:
On 07/24/2014 09:47 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
Where's a good place to add this to the Wiki? Main Developer page?
I think it is
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Fixing_Issues_Reported_By_Tools_For_Static_Code_Analysis#Coverity
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 18:42:11 +0530
Humble
On 07/31/2014 05:07 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 04:06:46AM -0700, Gluster Build System wrote:
SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.5.2.tar.gz
Bugs that have been marked for 3.5.2 and did not get fixed with this
release, are being moved to the
To fix these Coverity issues , please check the below link for guidelines:
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Fixing_Issues_Reported_By_Tools_For_Static_Code_Analysis#Coverity
Thanks,
Lala
Original Message
Subject:New Defects reported by
and Priority. We should
treat the wiki page as our policy document.
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Bug_triage
-Lala
On 8/21/2014 12:12 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
I hope the subject line have increased your curiosity to go through
the email :).
As a community, we are looking
On 08/27/2014 02:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 01:50:40PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
I'll do that, if someone could point me to it. Is it on the community
wiki or in doc/ directory in the source?
Seems to be only (?) on the wiki:
-
On 08/27/2014 03:29 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
On 08/27/2014 02:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 01:50:40PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
I'll do that, if someone could point me to it. Is it on the community
wiki or in doc/ directory in the source?
Seems to be only
On 09/08/2014 11:02 PM, Gluster Build System wrote:
SRC:
http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.4.6beta1.tar.gz
This release is made off jenkins-release-87
-- Gluster Build System
___
Gluster-users mailing list
On 09/26/2014 02:59 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 25/09/2014, at 9:28 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
snip
Have we published somewhere which distributions or OS versions we are running
regression tests ? if not lets compile it and publish as this will help
community to understand which os
On 09/30/2014 01:08 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
Hi all,
please join the #gluster-meeting IRC channel on irc.freenode.net to
participate on the following topics:
* Roll call
* Status of last weeks action items
* What happens after a bug has been marked Triaged?
* Add distinction between problem
On 10/28/2014 11:32 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
Does the following warning:
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Thu Jun 29 2014 Humble Chirammal
hchir...@redhat.com
warrant a bug report/fix as below (based on date of commit 8d8abc19)? Or should
I just leave it as is?
diff --git
On 11/11/2014 10:46 AM, Kiran Patil wrote:
Hi,
Please let me know where can we find the gluster v3.6.1 rpm for CentOS
6.6.
Thanks,
Kiran.
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty
lmoha...@redhat.com mailto:lmoha...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/11/2014 10:46 AM, Kiran Patil wrote:
Hi,
Please let me know where can we find the gluster v3.6.1 rpm for
CentOS 6.6.
Thanks,
Kiran
Guideline for fixing Coverity issues :
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Fixing_Issues_Reported_By_Tools_For_Static_Code_Analysis#Coverity
Thanks,
Lala
Forwarded Message
Subject:New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for GlusterFS
Date: Thu, 27
On 12/17/2014 12:56 PM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
I was looking into a Coverity issue (CID 1228603) in GlusterFS.
I sent a patch[1] before I fully understood why this was an issue.
After searching around in the internet for explanations, I identified that
the core issue was that a character
On 12/17/2014 07:39 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 08:40:18AM -0500, James wrote:
Hello,
If you plan on updating the operating-version value of GlusterFS, please
either ping me (@purpleidea) or send a patch to puppet-gluster [1].
Patches are 4 line yaml files, and you don't
There are two patches about how we can organise the developer docs
inside the GlusterFS source code. These patches needs more set of eyes
and also please put your thoughts here or in the patches.
[1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8348/
[2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8827/
Thanks,
Lala
On 02/19/2015 02:30 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
Hey Pranith!
Thanks for putting this topic on my radar. Uncommunicated packaging
changes have indeed been a pain for non-RPM distributions on several
occasions. We should try to inform other packagers about required
changes in the packaging scripts or
On 02/19/2015 04:25 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:45:41PM +0530, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
On 02/19/2015 02:30 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
Hey Pranith!
Thanks for putting this topic on my radar. Uncommunicated packaging
changes have indeed been a pain for non-RPM distributions
On 02/19/2015 05:21 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 04:52:41PM +0530, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
On 02/19/2015 04:25 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:45:41PM +0530, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
On 02/19/2015 02:30 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
Hey Pranith!
Thanks
On 04/01/2015 06:59 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 04/01/2015 05:44 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
Hello Gluster Ant People!
Right now, if you go to gluster.org, you see our current slogan in giant
text:
Write once, read everywhere
However, no one seems to be super-excited about that slogan. It
On 05/01/2015 12:34 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
Hi All,
GlusterFS 3.7 beta1 RPMs for RHEL, CentOS, ( except el5) and Fedora
are available at download.gluster.org http://download.gluster.org [1].
[1]http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/3.7.0beta1/
On 04/17/2015 12:25 PM, Ira Cooper wrote:
Do we have a problem Or is this a solution looking for a problem?
I'd rather have an overall code of conduct... of which e-mail correspondence
is a small part. :)
IMO email is one of the most important medium through which we conduct
ourself in
On 04/17/2015 11:56 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hi All,
Since the volume of posts on our mailing lists seems to be steadily
increasing, I wonder if we should evolve guidelines for posting in the
lists along the lines of the Fedora one [1]. It could be useful for
new entrants in the community to
On 08/05/2015 07:05 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le mardi 04 août 2015 à 16:22 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
Hi,
(resending from gluster-infra)
so while fiddling around with jenkins interface (autopromotionnow in
ssl/autopromotion), I wondered about cleaning the following jobs:
- cmockery2
On 08/05/2015 07:01 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
Indeed , no feedback on QA releases happens between minor versions.
I do think , there is no point to keep alpha/beta releases between
minor versions , but we can do that for Major as Kaleb mentioned.
--Humble
+1
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015
42 matches
Mail list logo
