Re: [Gluster-users] peer probe failures

can you please share the glusterd log file? On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Guy Cukierman wrote: > Hi, > > I’m having a similar issue, were you able to solve it? > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > I've got a strange problem going on here. I've installed

[Gluster-users] peer probe failures

Hey all, I've got a strange problem going on here. I've installed glusterfs-server on ubuntu 16.04: glusterfs-client/xenial,now 3.7.6-1ubuntu1 amd64 [installed,automatic] glusterfs-common/xenial,now 3.7.6-1ubuntu1 amd64 [installed,automatic] glusterfs-server/xenial,now 3.7.6-1ubuntu1 amd64

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

Strange, I’ve setup dozens of virtualization clusters, and never used anything other than bridged networking. I haven’t really met anyone using routed or NAT mode, but I guess there’s a first time for everything. You might be able to get the NAT mode to work for you, to pass traffic between

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 23:47:05 Russell Purinton wrote: > The routing table looks normal. That 3rd statement that Pawan mentioned is > just a normal default gateway. Nothing wrong there. > > I suspect the issue is at the virtual network layer… mode='route’/> seems suspect. > >

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

The routing table looks normal. That 3rd statement that Pawan mentioned is just a normal default gateway. Nothing wrong there. I suspect the issue is at the virtual network layer… > Cheers > Dev > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Joshua J. Kugler

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

The third statement in your route table states that for any network the default gateway is 192.168.122.1 I would suggest either you remove that statement or increase the metrics from 0, you already have a route to 192.168.122.0, it is in same broadcast domain so you don't have to go through the

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

Hmm...I'm wondering if my networking is messed up some how. But why would that cause host b to see host a as the gateway and not as the proper IP? j On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 17:33:03 Joshua J. Kugler wrote: > On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 18:27:46 Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > This is the problem,

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 18:27:46 Atin Mukherjee wrote: > This is the problem, peer handshaking hasn't finished yet. To get to > know the reason I'd need to get the glusterd log file from 192.168.122.10. Here's the log from the other machine (.10). > As a workaround can you do the following?

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

On 03/22/2016 01:14 PM, Joshua J. Kugler wrote: > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 14:44:18 Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> What does gluster peer status output say? > >>From the node that failed: > > [root@vmserver-b ~]# gluster peer status > Number of Peers: 1 > > Hostname: 192.168.122.10 > Uuid:

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

On Sunday, March 20, 2016 14:44:18 Atin Mukherjee wrote: > What does gluster peer status output say? >From the node that failed: [root@vmserver-b ~]# gluster peer status Number of Peers: 1 Hostname: 192.168.122.10 Uuid: d8e1d7a0-077a-4a50-93f6-d3922e3b96b9 State: Accepted peer request

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

Also send the glusterd log of the node where the commands have failed. -Atin Sent from one plus one On 20-Mar-2016 2:34 pm, "Atin Mukherjee" wrote: > What does gluster peer status output say? > > -Atin > Sent from one plus one > On 20-Mar-2016 1:16 pm, "Joshua J.

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

What does gluster peer status output say? -Atin Sent from one plus one On 20-Mar-2016 1:16 pm, "Joshua J. Kugler" wrote: > So, I'm trying to set up a new cluster. I set up Host A, get gluster up > and > running. That works. Then I set up Host B. > > From Host B, I run the

[Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

So, I'm trying to set up a new cluster. I set up Host A, get gluster up and running. That works. Then I set up Host B. >From Host B, I run the peer probe, and the command and logs tell me that worked. I then try to run the 'volume create' command, I get the error failed: Host 192.168.122.10

[Gluster-users] peer probe pb when adding new brick

Hi everyone, I have configured four computer in order to make a distrubuted replica 2 volume. I work with a centos 6.5 linux Raid5 lvm, ande create a xfs filesystem with quota. Then I create the gluster volume : gluster volume create gvrepli replica 2

[Gluster-users] peer probe stochastic behaviour in shell

Hi everone: This is a quite odd behaviour i saw today in my VMs. sh-4.2# gluster peer status peer status: No peers present sh-4.2# gluster peer probe 10.10.10.12 sh-4.2# gluster peer status peer status: No peers present sh-4.2# gluster peer probe 10.10.10.12 peer probe: success The second call

[Gluster-users] peer probe fails (107)

Hi gluster: Im getting the cryptic 107 error, (I guess this means gluster can't see a peer)... gluster peer probe vm-2 peer probe: failed: Probe returned with unknown errno 107 When I can effectively ssh and ping a given server. I've seen other threads regarding this, some of them to deal with

Re: [Gluster-users] peer probe fails (107)

Looks like there might be a firewall (iptables) in the way? Can you flush all iptables rules and retry - just to confirm? Avati On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jay Vyas jayunit...@gmail.com wrote: Hi gluster: Im getting the cryptic 107 error, (I guess this means gluster can't see a

Re: [Gluster-users] peer probe fails (107)

Ahhh iptables strikes back ! You were right. Ive now got Peer probe success. :) *** Lesson Learned In killing IPTables on Fedora16 ?*** Im on Fedora 16, so this might not be relevant to everyone.. but... Rather than service iptables stop (maybe this wasnt really killing all the ip rules), I

Re: [Gluster-users] peer probe fails (107)

I don't remember how far back firewalld goes, but from at least Fedora 17 on, iptables is managed by the firewalld service, not iptables. Perhaps that's what you were running in to. On 05/20/2013 04:11 PM, Jay Vyas wrote: Ahhh iptables strikes back ! You were right. Ive now got Peer probe

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

I finally got everything up. However, when transferring files the server locks up.. df hangs etc. In order to get things working I have to kill off processes and unmount for the box to start responding. I put everything back on the NIC cards and transferring files works as expected. Any ideas?

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

You have a host, fpsgluster, that's a peer. It's assigned a uuid. You peer probe a different hostname, fpsglusterib, that reports the same uuid - hence, already a peer. You could remove it and re-add it with the new hostname unless you've created volumes using the non-ib hostname. If you

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

Are your bricks formatted ext4? On 02/28/2013 10:32 AM, Tony Saenz wrote: I finally got everything up. However, when transferring files the server locks up.. df hangs etc. In order to get things working I have to kill off processes and unmount for the box to start responding. I put everything

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

No, they're XFS and thanks for the other tip! Is there something missing? It's pretty consistent.. Reads are fine but as soon as I transfer/copy files the mount starts hanging and the server locks up. On Feb 28, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Joe Julian j...@julianfamily.org wrote: Are your bricks

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 06:28:01PM +, Tony Saenz wrote: Any help please? The regular NICs are fine which is what it currently sees but I'd like to move them over to the Infiniband cards. ... [root@fpsgluster testvault]# gluster peer probe fpsgluster2ib Probe on host fpsgluster2ib port 0

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

Any help please? The regular NICs are fine which is what it currently sees but I'd like to move them over to the Infiniband cards. On Feb 22, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Anthony Saenz t...@filmsolutions.com wrote: Hey, I was wondering if I could get a bit of help.. I installed a new Infiniband card

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

Your error message seems to indicate that the peer is already in the storage pool ? What is the output of gluster peer status ? On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Tony Saenz t...@filmsolutions.com wrote: Any help please? The regular NICs are fine which is what it currently sees but I'd like to

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

It shows this but it's still going through my NIC cards and not the Infiniband. (Checked the traffic on the cards themselves) [root@fpsgluster ~]# gluster peer status Number of Peers: 1 Hostname: fpsgluster2 Uuid: 9b7e7c2d-f05b-4cc8-b55a-571e383328d0 State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) On Feb

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

It /might be/probably is/ DNS-related. Are you trying to do this with RDMA or IPoIB? If IPoIB, are ALL your /etc/hosts files in sync (IB names separate and distinct from the ethernet interfaces) and responsive to the appropriate interfaces? Do the IB interfaces show up as distinct (and

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

Trying to first get this working with IPoIB [root@fpsgluster ~]# ibhosts Ca : 0x0011757937b2 ports 1 fpsgluster2 qib0 Ca : 0x001175792af2 ports 1 fpsgluster qib0 I'm able to ping the other box from Infiniband to Infiniband card Ifconfig uses the ioctl access method to get the

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

That looks OK (but your 2 MTUs are mismatched - should fix that). UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:2044 Metric:1 - 1st UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:65520 Metric:1 - 2nd ^ IBDEV=ibX modprobe ib_umad modprobe

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Probe

[root@fpsgluster ~]# gluster volume create testvault replica 2 transport rdma,tcp fpsglusterib:/mnt/testbrick1 fpsgluster2ib:/mnt/testbrick1 fpsglusterib:/mnt/testbrick2 fpsgluster2ib:/mnt/testbrick2 fpsglusterib:/mnt/testbrick3 fpsgluster2ib:/mnt/testbrick3 Host fpsgluster2ib not a friend Not

[Gluster-users] Peer Probe

Hey, I was wondering if I could get a bit of help.. I installed a new Infiniband card into my servers but I'm unable to get it to come up as a peer. Is there something I'm missing? [root@fpsgluster testvault]# gluster peer probe fpsgluster2ib Probe on host fpsgluster2ib port 0 already in peer

Re: [Gluster-users] peer probe fails

Per Raghav on #gluster, i started with -LDEBUG and captured the logs. Logs are at ... http://pastie.org/3496176 It also has the glusterd and glustefs version info. thanx, deepak On 03/01/2012 10:43 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote: On 02/29/2012 10:11 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 02/29/2012 07:38

Re: [Gluster-users] peer probe fails

On 02/29/2012 10:11 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 02/29/2012 07:38 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote: Latest cli.log ... [2012-02-01 03:39:33.096303] W [rpc-transport.c:183:rpc_transport_load] 0-rpc-transport: missing 'option transport-type'. defaulting to socket [2012-02-01 03:39:33.220545] E