Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Query on healing process

Hi Ravi, 3. On the rebooted node, do you have ssl enabled by any chance? There is a bug for "Not able to fetch volfile' when ssl is enabled: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258931 -> I have checked but ssl is disabled but still getting these errors # gluster volume heal

Re: [Gluster-users] ZFS error in logs

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Gmail wrote: > I’m trying to use ZFS with Gluster 3.7.3 and I see the following error in > the logs: > > E [MSGID: 106419] [glusterd-utils.c:4973:glusterd_add_inode_size_to_dict] > 0-management: could not find (null) to getinode size for

[Gluster-users] ZFS error in logs

I’m trying to use ZFS with Gluster 3.7.3 and I see the following error in the logs: E [MSGID: 106419] [glusterd-utils.c:4973:glusterd_add_inode_size_to_dict] 0-management: could not find (null) to getinode size for zpool/brick01 (zfs): (null) package missing? did anybody notice this error

[Gluster-users] Fwd: [Gluster-devel] proposal to remove the qemu-block xlator from master branch

- Forwarded Message - It's not clear to some of us that anyone is using this xlator. The associated contrib/qemu sources are very old, and there is nobody currently maintaining it. It would take a substantial effort to update it – to what end, if nobody actually uses it? Bundled in

Re: [Gluster-users] [ovirt-users] open error -13 = sanlock

On 03/04/2016 07:53 AM, Alan Millar wrote: On Mar 3, 2016, at 7:12 AM, p...@email.cz wrote: will extend replica 2 to replica 3 ( arbiter ) ASAP . Anyone know how to do that? The add-brick command in 3.7.8 doesn’t let me specify “arbiter 1” after “replica 3”. I thought I read that the

Re: [Gluster-users] [ovirt-users] open error -13 = sanlock

> On Mar 3, 2016, at 7:12 AM, p...@email.cz wrote: > > will extend replica 2 to replica 3 ( arbiter ) ASAP . Anyone know how to do that? The add-brick command in 3.7.8 doesn’t let me specify “arbiter 1” after “replica 3”. I thought I read that the ability to change to an arbiter volume

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster 3.7.6 volume set: failed: One or more connected clients cannot support the feature being set

-Atin Sent from one plus one On 04-Mar-2016 3:35 am, "Steve Dainard" wrote: > > FYI Gluster storage node hostnames are gluster0[1-6]. > > Full dump attached. I see a few clients not on 30706. Most notably the two debian 7 servers (using packages from gluster.org) seem to be

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster 3.7.6 volume set: failed: One or more connected clients cannot support the feature being set

FYI Gluster storage node hostnames are gluster0[1-6]. Full dump attached. I see a few clients not on 30706. Most notably the two debian 7 servers (using packages from gluster.org) seem to be running lower op versions than the centos7 machines (every other client in 10.0.231.0/24 subnet).

Re: [Gluster-users] Moved files from one directory to another, now gone

Pranith, Sorry for taking so long. Work required my time. So I can look at this a little more right now. I am using glusterfs-3.7.6-1 Here is some pertinent info: ]# gluster volume info DATA Volume Name: DATA Type: Disperse Volume ID: 8374314b-796a-48d0-acf7-dea51fdd83ae Status: Started Number

Re: [Gluster-users] about tail command

>> 1. the command "gluster v replace-brick " is async or sync? The > replace is >> complete when the command quit ? > It is a sync command, replacing the brick finishes as the command returns. Hmm, that has not been my experience with 3.7.6 and 3.7.8. Perhaps there is a question of

[Gluster-users] gluster 3.8 release date

Hey Guys, I see from https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-January/024828.html thread that gluster 3.8 is planned to be released in the end of May or early June. Do we have any specific/close date for the release? Also wondering if we are still in the schedule mentioned in the

Re: [Gluster-users] [ovirt-users] open error -13 = sanlock

OK, will extend replica 2 to replica 3 ( arbiter ) ASAP . If is deleted "untouching" ids file on brick , healing of this file doesn't work . regs.Pa. On 3.3.2016 12:19, Nir Soffer wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:23 AM, p...@email.cz

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs NFS performance issue

Dne 03/03/16 08:10, Jiffin Tony Thottan napsal(a): On 29/02/16 15:25, Pavel Riha wrote: Hi all, I have read some recent post about performance issues, complaining about the fuse driver and recomended NFS.. although my final goal is replicate volume, I'm now just doing some test for reference.

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

Le 03/03/2016 15:07, Krutika Dhananjay a écrit : Ok, and what version of glusterfs are you using? At this time I'm using glusterfs 3.6.7 on Debian 8 (64bit), same OS on servers and clients. -- Y. -Krutika *From:

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

On 03/03/2016 05:38 PM, Yannick Perret wrote: Hello, I can't find if it is possible to set a prefered server on a per-client basis for replica volumes, so I ask the question here. The context: we have 2 storage servers, each in one building. We also have several virtual machines on each

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

Ok, and what version of glusterfs are you using? -Krutika - Original Message - > From: "Yannick Perret" > To: "Krutika Dhananjay" > Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org > Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 7:23:09 PM > Subject: Re:

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

Le 03/03/2016 13:18, Krutika Dhananjay a écrit : What does "nearest" storage server mean? Are the clients residing in the storage pool too? Or are they external to the cluster? They are external. Nearest means that they are in the same building, linked by the same switch. Machines in the

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

What does "nearest" storage server mean? Are the clients residing in the storage pool too? Or are they external to the cluster? -Krutika - Original Message - > From: "Yannick Perret" > To: gluster-users@gluster.org > Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 5:38:33

[Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

Hello, I can't find if it is possible to set a prefered server on a per-client basis for replica volumes, so I ask the question here. The context: we have 2 storage servers, each in one building. We also have several virtual machines on each building, and they can migrate from one building

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster volume heal info split brain command not showing files in split-brain

- Original Message - > From: "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" > To: gluster-users@gluster.org, gluster-de...@gluster.org > Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 12:10:42 PM > Subject: [Gluster-users] gluster volume heal info split brain command not > showing files in split-brain

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs NFS performance issue

Pavel Riha wrote on 29/02/2016 09:55: > > I have read some recent post about performance issues, complaining > about the fuse driver and recomended NFS.. > > although my final goal is replicate volume, I'm now just doing some > test for reference. > > my basic benchmark is dd if=/dev/zero

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Query on healing process

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Ravishankar N wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/03/2016 11:14 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > Hi Ravi, > > As I discussed earlier this issue, I investigated this issue and find that > healing is not triggered because the "gluster volume heal

Re: [Gluster-users] [ovirt-users] open error -13 = sanlock

On 03/03/2016 02:53 PM, p...@email.cz wrote: This is replica 2, only , with following settings Options Reconfigured: performance.quick-read: off performance.read-ahead: off performance.io-cache: off performance.stat-prefetch: off cluster.eager-lock: enable network.remote-dio: enable

Re: [Gluster-users] [ovirt-users] open error -13 = sanlock

This is replica 2, only , with following settings Options Reconfigured: performance.quick-read: off performance.read-ahead: off performance.io-cache: off performance.stat-prefetch: off cluster.eager-lock: enable network.remote-dio: enable cluster.quorum-type: fixed cluster.server-quorum-type: